【摘要】：科舉制度被廢除后,中國傳統(tǒng)士大夫入仕參政的人生道路被阻斷。在新的歷史語境下,知識(shí)分子們必須重新規(guī)劃人生道路,他們不再將自己的人生理想寄托于廟堂,轉(zhuǎn)而走向民間,有的辦起了學(xué)校、有的從事出版,也有一些開始了辦報(bào)活動(dòng)。這些活動(dòng)的開展使知識(shí)分子們開始具有自己獨(dú)立的品格和價(jià)值判斷�！冻繄�(bào)副刊》即是在這樣的背景下誕生。 從1919年2月《晨報(bào)副刊》改版開始至1926年徐志摩離開《晨報(bào)副刊》,在這7年的時(shí)間里,《晨報(bào)副刊》先后經(jīng)歷了三大主編。在不同主編主持期間,《晨報(bào)副刊》呈現(xiàn)出的精神面貌也是不同,直至三大主編先后離開。到底當(dāng)初這些知識(shí)分子們是為何集結(jié)在《晨報(bào)副刊》周圍,后來又是什么原因?qū)е滤麄兎值罁P(yáng)鑣?本文共分四章,旨在這些方面進(jìn)行相關(guān)探討。 第一章為文章的基礎(chǔ)和鋪墊。在此將交代自1905年廢除科舉制度以后,傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)分子們狹窄的生存空間和現(xiàn)實(shí)處境。說明知識(shí)分子是為何集結(jié),他們集結(jié)辦報(bào)時(shí)的社會(huì)背景。還將交代知識(shí)分子們是如何對(duì)辦報(bào)空間進(jìn)行建構(gòu)的。 在第二章中,將視角對(duì)準(zhǔn)李大釗、孫伏園、徐志摩三大主編以及聚集在他們周圍的知識(shí)分子們是如何在《晨報(bào)副刊》的平臺(tái)上“發(fā)聲”、“立言”,通過對(duì)《晨報(bào)副刊》傳播內(nèi)容的定量分析和歷任主編的交際圈的解讀,說明《晨報(bào)副刊》與知識(shí)分子們的聚合是什么原因。 第三章通過對(duì)《晨報(bào)副刊》歷任三大主編報(bào)刊思想、編輯特色的分析以及對(duì)圍繞在《晨報(bào)副刊》周圍的知識(shí)分子們的“后臺(tái)景觀”的呈現(xiàn),揭示出李大釗、孫伏園、徐志摩先后離開《晨報(bào)副刊》的深層次原因。 第四章是文章的總結(jié)和升華。論證近代政黨化知識(shí)分子圍繞在《晨報(bào)副刊》周圍是出于辦報(bào)立言的初衷,而一旦“立言”與《晨報(bào)》總編輯辦報(bào)思想相沖突,由于近代知識(shí)分子自我意識(shí)的覺醒,他們將會(huì)尋找下一個(gè)可以“發(fā)聲”的輿論舞臺(tái),而絕不聽之任之。 通過對(duì)《晨報(bào)副刊》及歷任三大主編報(bào)刊思想的分析,可以總結(jié)出在特定的社會(huì)歷史條件及政治環(huán)境下,包括副刊在內(nèi)的媒介通過自身有意識(shí)、有傾向的傳播,可以發(fā)揮自身獨(dú)特的輿論動(dòng)員作用來促進(jìn)社會(huì)的進(jìn)步,而社會(huì)大環(huán)境反過來又促進(jìn)了媒介的改革。
[Abstract]:After the abolishment of the imperial examination system, the life path of Chinese traditional scholar-bureaucrats to participate in politics was blocked. In the new historical context, intellectuals must replan their life paths. Instead of pinning their life ideals in temples and halls, they have moved towards the people. Some have set up schools, some have engaged in publishing, and some have begun to run newspapers. These activities made intellectuals begin to have their own independent character and value judgment. The Morning Post Supplement was born in this context. From February 1919 to 1926, Xu Zhimo left the Morning Post Supplement. In these seven years, the Morning Post Supplement has experienced three major editors-in-chief. During the period of different editors-in-chief, the spiritual outlook of Morning Post Supplement was different, until the three editors-in-chief left one after another. Why did the intellectuals gather around the Morning Post, and what led them to part ways? This paper is divided into four chapters, in order to carry on the related discussion in these aspects. The first chapter is the foundation and preparation of the article. After abolishing the imperial examination system in 1905, the traditional intellectuals have a narrow living space and realistic situation. Explain why intellectuals regrouped, their social background when they gathered to run newspapers. It will also explain how intellectuals construct the space for running newspapers. In the second chapter, we will focus on how the three chief editors-in-chief of Li Dazhao, Sun Fuyuan and Xu Zhimo, as well as the intellectuals gathered around them, "speak" and "speak" on the platform of the Morning Post Supplement. Through the quantitative analysis of the dissemination contents of the Morning Post Supplement and the interpretation of the communication circle of the editors-in-chief, the reasons for the aggregation of the Morning Post Supplement and the intellectuals are explained. The third chapter reveals Li Dazhao and Sun Fuyuan through the analysis of the thoughts of the three major editors-in-chief of the Morning Post, the editorial characteristics and the presentation of the "background landscape" of the intellectuals surrounding the Morning Post Supplement. Xu Zhimo successively left the Morning Post supplement of the deep-seated reasons. The fourth chapter is the summary and sublimation of the article. It is demonstrated that the modern political intellectuals revolved around the Morning Post Supplement because of the original intention of setting up a newspaper, and once the "making a speech" conflicts with the thought of the editor-in-chief of the Morning Post, due to the awakening of the self-consciousness of the modern intellectuals, They will look for the next stage of public opinion that can "speak" and never let it go. Through the analysis of the "Morning Post Supplement" and the thought of the three major editors-in-chief newspapers and periodicals, it can be concluded that under the specific social and historical conditions and political environment, the media, including the supplement, propagate through their own consciousness and tendency. It can play its own unique role of public opinion mobilization to promote social progress, and the social environment in turn has promoted the reform of the media.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G213

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董錦瑞;五四運(yùn)動(dòng)與革命報(bào)刊的發(fā)展[J];編輯學(xué)刊;1999年04期

2 何海巍;;五四時(shí)期報(bào)紙副刊的兩種流變及其原因[J];浙江傳媒學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 樊亞平,吳小美;“‘晨副’,我的喇叭”——論徐志摩主編的《晨報(bào)》副刊[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年01期

4 張李慧;;《晨報(bào)副刊》的發(fā)展概況[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年01期

5 胡博;;《晨報(bào)副刊》與早期新月派[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

6 馬誠;;淺談孫伏園時(shí)期《晨報(bào)副刊》的編輯特色[J];今日湖北(理論版);2007年02期

7 王湘軍,朱志敏;五十年來五四運(yùn)動(dòng)史研究概述[J];歷史教學(xué);1999年05期

8 崔銀河;;《晨報(bào)》副刊與中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

9 張芹;;《晨報(bào)》附刊與五四時(shí)期科學(xué)啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];新聞界;2006年05期

10 李曉蘭;;《晨鐘報(bào)》特色專欄之“警語”[J];南通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張芹;《晨報(bào)》附刊與“五四”新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2001年

2 高艷紅;孫伏園的副刊編輯思想研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2452640