【摘要】：臨時復制是指合法享有著作權(quán)的作品通過技術手段錄入計算機，經(jīng)過短暫保留，然后因計算機斷電或者重啟而造成保留信息消失的過程。常見于計算機領域，例如網(wǎng)頁瀏覽、在線欣賞及下載等，是網(wǎng)絡傳播技術中的一項重要方式，被廣大網(wǎng)民頻繁使用。 著作權(quán)中的復制的目的在于采取合理使用、法定許可、授權(quán)許可等方式對文化、藝術和科學作品的著作權(quán)保護加以限制。隨著計算機網(wǎng)絡的普及，傳播方式變得更加多樣化。傳統(tǒng)的實體復制正在逐步向虛擬化復制轉(zhuǎn)變，人們在享受便利的同時，著作權(quán)人的合法利益正經(jīng)受著考驗。臨時復制有別于傳統(tǒng)意義上的復制，網(wǎng)絡的便捷給權(quán)利人帶來的是著作權(quán)限制的解除，與我國現(xiàn)行的《著作權(quán)法》根本意愿背道而馳。誠然，臨時復制作為時代發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，有著獨特的新穎性，變化趨勢也日趨復雜。目前，國際性組織和世界各國都起草制定相應的立法來完善臨時復制問題，，但多變的社會背景導致對臨時復制不能達成統(tǒng)一的觀點。我國對著作權(quán)中的復制有明確的界定，有相對成型的立法體系作為支撐。然而卻對臨時復制未作明確解釋，就其產(chǎn)生的本質(zhì)和表現(xiàn)形式爭議不斷。面對逐漸融入生活的網(wǎng)絡時代，涉及到臨時復制的問題越來越頻繁，損害了權(quán)利人的合法利益，也使得司法實踐成為難題。 臨時復制基于著作權(quán)產(chǎn)生，又與傳統(tǒng)復制有著明顯的區(qū)別，不能簡單的將臨時復制涵蓋到復制之中，籠統(tǒng)的套用合理使用這一寬泛的概念來解釋，已經(jīng)不能滿足對司法實踐的需求。合理使用也不能成為臨時復制的抗辯理由，因為合理使用本身就是一個模糊的概念。綜上，筆者認為我國應該從立法上明確臨時復制，從理論與實踐相結(jié)合闡述臨時復制與著作權(quán)中復制的區(qū)別，力圖為司法實踐創(chuàng)造有利的途徑。 本文共分七章。第一章由不同時代背景下的兩個案例引出臨時復制問題的多樣性和復雜性。第二章闡述了國際性組織和世界各國關于臨時復制的立法情況。第三章根據(jù)對我國著作權(quán)法的研究，從實質(zhì)和表現(xiàn)形式上對臨時復制進行說明。第四章著重對比了臨時復制與傳統(tǒng)意義中復制的關聯(lián)。第五章通過臨時復制常見的表現(xiàn)形式下載，進一步分析臨時復制的法律責任。第六章根據(jù)前文的分析研究提出了筆者的觀點。第七章簡要的對我國臨時復制立法提出了可行性的建議。
[Abstract]:Temporary reproduction refers to the process in which the copyright works are entered into the computer through technical means, and then the reserved information is lost because the computer is cut off or restarted. Common in the field of computer, such as web browsing, online appreciation and download, is an important way of network communication technology, is frequently used by the majority of Internet users. The purpose of copyright reproduction is to restrict the copyright protection of cultural, artistic and scientific works by means of reasonable use, legal permission, authorization and so on. With the popularity of computer networks, the modes of communication have become more diversified. The traditional physical reproduction is gradually changing to virtual reproduction. While people enjoy convenience, the legitimate interests of copyright owners are being tested. The temporary copy is different from the traditional copy. The convenience of the network brings to the obligee the lifting of the copyright restriction, which runs counter to the basic intention of the present copyright Law in our country. Indeed, as a product of the development of the times, temporary replication has its unique novelty, and the trend of change is becoming more and more complicated. At present, international organizations and countries all over the world draft relevant legislation to perfect the problem of temporary replication, but the changing social background leads to the view that temporary replication cannot be unified. There is a clear definition of copyright reproduction in China, supported by a relatively formed legislative system. However, temporary reproduction is not clearly explained, and its nature and manifestation are controversial. In the network age, the problem of temporary replication becomes more and more frequent, which damages the legitimate interests of the obligee and makes the judicial practice become a difficult problem. Temporary copy is based on copyright and has obvious difference from traditional copy. It can not be simply covered by temporary copy, and the broad concept of reasonable use can be applied to explain it. Can not meet the needs of judicial practice. Reasonable use is not a defense for temporary replication, as rational use is a vague concept. In summary, the author thinks that our country should make clear the temporary copy from the legislation, expound the difference between the temporary copy and the copyright copy from the combination of theory and practice, and try to create a favorable way for the judicial practice. This paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter introduces the diversity and complexity of temporary replication problem from two cases in different times. The second chapter describes the international organizations and countries around the world on the provisional copy of the legislation. According to the study of China's copyright law, the third chapter explains the nature and form of temporary reproduction. Chapter four focuses on the relationship between temporary replication and traditional replication. Chapter five analyzes the legal liability of temporary replication by downloading the common forms of temporary replication. The sixth chapter puts forward the author's point of view according to the above analysis and research. The seventh chapter briefly puts forward the feasible suggestion to our country provisional copy legislation.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊異;吳蕾;;網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下臨時復制的法律界定[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2008年12期

2 朱理;;臨時復制是否屬于著作權(quán)法意義上的復制——以國際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年01期

3 苗雪魁;;網(wǎng)絡著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2009年10期

4 鄒杰;薛嘉鈺;;如何看待臨時復制[J];消費導刊;2008年06期

5 金玲;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與網(wǎng)絡傳輸[J];科技與法律;2000年01期

6 彭學龍;;技術發(fā)展與法律變遷中的復制權(quán)[J];科技與法律;2006年01期

7 王遷;;版權(quán)法保護技術措施的正當性[J];法學研究;2011年04期

8 任向東;焦泉;;網(wǎng)絡臨時復制法律問題研究[J];南京郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

9 凌洪斌;;論網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下著作權(quán)合理使用制度之完善[J];江西科技師范學院學報;2008年02期

10 劉進,盧曉霞;數(shù)字時代作品復制權(quán)及其限制[J];社會科學;2002年10期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 虞正春;論復制權(quán)[D];華東政法學院;2005年

2 張敏;論網(wǎng)絡中介服務提供商的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責任[D];上海交通大學;2007年

3 趙偉濤;論網(wǎng)絡環(huán)境下私人復制與版權(quán)的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[D];南昌大學;2008年

本文編號：2427182