【摘要】：“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”是最早確立于美國(guó)版權(quán)法中,并為世界各國(guó)著作權(quán)立法普遍采用的,適用于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域,用以解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者版權(quán)侵權(quán)問題的一項(xiàng)規(guī)則。我國(guó)也在《網(wǎng)絡(luò)司法解釋》、《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》以及最近頒布的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中規(guī)定了有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的免責(zé)性條款,這些條款構(gòu)成了我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的“避風(fēng)港”。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中,任何網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶的直接侵權(quán)都不可能離開網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的硬件設(shè)施和軟件系統(tǒng),所以如何適用“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”來免除網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任尤為重要。 本文主要就是研究在避風(fēng)港規(guī)則之下網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。讓符合法律規(guī)定免責(zé)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商進(jìn)入“避風(fēng)港”,讓不符合免責(zé)條款的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任,才能保證整個(gè)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)健康、持久的發(fā)展。 第一章首先介紹了“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”產(chǎn)生的背景以及其具體內(nèi)容,說明網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在符合“通知與移除”規(guī)則的條件下可以免責(zé)。接著引出“紅旗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”,討論在何種情況下網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者存在主觀過錯(cuò),需要承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 第二章本文按照法律出臺(tái)的先后順序來介紹我國(guó)法律對(duì)“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”的規(guī)定,分別針對(duì)各個(gè)法律條文中關(guān)于“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”的條款予以解釋,指出法律規(guī)定越來越合理,更加有利于解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者與權(quán)利人之間的糾紛。 第三章本文進(jìn)入“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”的司法實(shí)踐研究,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商提供的服務(wù)進(jìn)行分類,選擇出現(xiàn)糾紛較多的信息存儲(chǔ)空間服務(wù)、搜索或者鏈接服務(wù)等領(lǐng)域,通過典型案例分析如何適用“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”來認(rèn)定信息存儲(chǔ)空間服務(wù)、提供搜索或者鏈接服務(wù)等網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 第四章首先簡(jiǎn)單介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則,指明過錯(cuò)責(zé)任是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則,最后分析了如何在“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”下認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的主觀過錯(cuò),從而讓其承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 最后,本文指出“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者提供了庇護(hù),但同時(shí)也要求網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者必須盡到合理注意義務(wù),目的是為了權(quán)利人與網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者之間的利益平衡。
[Abstract]:The "safe haven rule" is a rule established in the copyright law of the United States and widely used in copyright legislation of various countries in the world. It is applicable to the Internet field and is used to solve the copyright infringement problem of network service providers. China has also stipulated the exemption clauses of network service providers in the Internet Judicial interpretation, the regulations on the Protection of the right of Information Communication and the recently promulgated Tort liability Law. These clauses constitute the "safe haven" of our country's network service providers. In the network environment, the direct infringement of any network user can not leave the hardware and software system of the network service provider, so how to apply the "safe haven rule" to avoid the indirect tort liability of the network service provider is particularly important. This article mainly studies the copyright infringement liability of network service provider under the safe haven rule. Only by allowing the network service providers that accord with the legal exemption to enter the "safe haven", and allowing the network service providers that do not comply with the exemption clauses to bear the tort liability, can the whole Internet industry develop healthily and sustainably. The first chapter introduces the background and content of the "safe haven rules", and explains that network service providers can be exempted from liability under the conditions of "notification and removal". Then the red flag standard is introduced to discuss the subjective fault of network service providers and the need to assume tort liability. In the second chapter, according to the order in which the law is issued, the article introduces the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in our country's laws, and explains the provisions of the "safe haven rules" in each legal provision separately, and points out that the legal provisions are becoming more and more reasonable. More conducive to the settlement of disputes between network service providers and right holders. In Chapter three, this article enters the judicial practice research of the "safe haven rules", classifies the services provided by network service providers, and selects information storage space services, search or link services, which have more disputes, and so on. Through the typical case analysis how to apply the "safe haven rule" to identify the information storage space services, provide search or link services and other network service providers copyright infringement liability. Chapter four introduces the liability principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider, and points out that fault liability is the imputation principle of copyright infringement liability of network service provider. Finally, it analyzes how to identify the subjective fault of the network service provider under the "safe haven rules" so that it can bear the tort liability. Finally, this paper points out that the "safe haven rules" provide shelter for network service providers, but at the same time, it also requires the network service providers to do their fair duty of care, in order to balance the interests between the right holders and the network service providers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙云;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任研究[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2012年

2 陳玲;我國(guó)視頻分享網(wǎng)站的“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

3 吳淑朋;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條評(píng)析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

4 溫靜靜;數(shù)字音樂網(wǎng)站中的音樂版權(quán)問題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2422627