發(fā)布時間：2019-02-12 19:18

【摘要】：匯編作品在各國的著作權(quán)法上都是作為一種獨(dú)立的作品類型進(jìn)行保護(hù)的。各種形式的作品或者不構(gòu)成作品的數(shù)據(jù)材料都有可能成為匯編作品，只要在對這些內(nèi)容的選擇和編排上體現(xiàn)了獨(dú)創(chuàng)性。然而各國對“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的要求并不一致�！蔼�(dú)創(chuàng)性”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)本身也經(jīng)歷了從最初的“額頭流汗原則”到“最低限度的智力創(chuàng)造”的變化。除了可以受版權(quán)保護(hù)的匯編作品外，還有一些在選擇和編排方面不具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的匯編物（非獨(dú)創(chuàng)性數(shù)據(jù)庫）不能受版權(quán)法保護(hù)，但是在實(shí)踐中它們也有很強(qiáng)的利用價值，如何對這類匯編物提供法律保護(hù)也是我們所要討論的問題。本文主要圍繞著匯編作品“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)變化以及其與數(shù)據(jù)庫保護(hù)的關(guān)系展開討論，除引言和結(jié)語外主要分為四章： 第一章：額頭流汗原則的揚(yáng)棄對匯編作品版權(quán)保護(hù)的影響。本章主要以美國Feist案為線索，分析額頭流汗原則對匯編作品的保護(hù)狀態(tài)，，來進(jìn)一步分析額頭流汗原則的弊端。 第二章：獨(dú)創(chuàng)性原則下匯編作品的版權(quán)保護(hù)。本章筆者主要分析匯編作品獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的特殊所在（即不問內(nèi)容，只看對內(nèi)容的選擇和編排），并通過案例來展開討論在獨(dú)創(chuàng)性原則下匯編作品版權(quán)保護(hù)的范圍的局限性及解決辦法。 第三章：非獨(dú)創(chuàng)性數(shù)據(jù)庫的法律保護(hù)。在舍棄額頭流汗原則后原來被視為匯編作品的非獨(dú)創(chuàng)性數(shù)據(jù)庫出現(xiàn)了保護(hù)空白，可見光對數(shù)據(jù)庫提供版權(quán)保護(hù)是有局限性的，必須另尋他途來解決。本章主要討論對這些非獨(dú)創(chuàng)性數(shù)據(jù)庫的保護(hù)（歐盟的數(shù)據(jù)庫權(quán)思路、美國的反不正當(dāng)競爭思路、德國將其納入鄰接權(quán)保護(hù)）以及我國該何去何從。 第四章：匯編作品版權(quán)保護(hù)中的利益平衡考量。匯編作品，特別是事實(shí)性匯編作品提供版權(quán)保護(hù)是否會造成版權(quán)人對事實(shí)的壟斷而侵犯公眾的利益，這是匯編作品版權(quán)保護(hù)無法回避的利益平衡之慮。
[Abstract]:Compilation works are protected as an independent type of works in the copyright laws of various countries. Any form of work or data material that does not form a work can become a compilation, provided that the selection and arrangement of the content is original. However, countries' requirements for "originality" standards are not consistent. The "originality" standard itself has undergone a change from the original "forehead sweating principle" to the "minimum intellectual creation". In addition to copyrighted compilations, there are other non-original compilations (non-original databases) that are not protected by copyright law in terms of selection and layout, but they are also highly useful in practice. How to provide legal protection to this kind of compendium is also the question that we will discuss. This paper focuses on the standard changes of "originality" of the compilation work and its relationship with database protection. Besides introduction and conclusion, it is divided into four chapters: chapter one: the influence of sweating principle of forehead on copyright protection of compilation works. This chapter mainly takes the American Feist case as the clue, analyzes the frontal sweat principle to the compilation work protection state, further analyzes the frontal sweat principle malpractice. Chapter two: copyright protection of compilation works under the principle of originality. In this chapter, the author mainly analyzes the originality of the compilation works (that is, regardless of the content, only the selection and arrangement of the content), The limitations and solutions of copyright protection in compiling works under the principle of originality are discussed through cases. Chapter three: legal protection of non-original database. After abandoning the principle of sweat on the forehead, the non-original database, which was originally regarded as a compilation of works, has a protection gap. The visible light has limitations in providing copyright protection to the database, and must find another way to solve it. This chapter mainly discusses the protection of these non-original databases (the idea of database rights in the European Union, the idea of anti-unfair competition in the United States, and the protection of neighboring rights in Germany) and the future of our country. Chapter four: the balance of interests in copyright protection of compilation works. Whether the copyright protection provided by the compilation works, especially the factual compilation works, will cause the copyright owners to monopolize the facts and infringe upon the public interests is an unavoidable balance of interests for the copyright protection of the compilation works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周智軍;;從美國對數(shù)據(jù)庫保護(hù)的進(jìn)程看我國對數(shù)據(jù)庫的保護(hù)[J];法制與社會;2009年06期

2 戴建志,夏輝;匯編作品的創(chuàng)作特征[J];法律適用;2000年03期

3 王建芳;;論大眾點(diǎn)評網(wǎng)站的著作權(quán)保護(hù)——大眾點(diǎn)評網(wǎng)訴愛幫網(wǎng)侵犯著作權(quán)案評析[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2010年08期

4 陳惠珍;;匯編作品著作權(quán)和版式權(quán)的界定及權(quán)利范圍——《中國學(xué)術(shù)期刊(光盤版)》系列著作權(quán)案評析[J];科技與法律;2009年04期

5 陶舒亞;;匯編作品著作權(quán)相關(guān)問題探析[J];中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年05期

6 王遷;;論我國《著作權(quán)法》中“匯編權(quán)”的重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年06期

7 顧微微;徐慎莉;;從美國Feist案看匯編作品的法律保護(hù)[J];新疆社科論壇;2006年04期

8 盧海君;;辛勤收集原則在匯編作品版權(quán)保護(hù)中的地位和影響[J];中國出版;2011年03期

9 楊巧;匯編作品,抑或民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品?——“仿古迎賓入城式”著作權(quán)糾紛一案的評析[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年05期

10 黃振中;;使用匯編作品的內(nèi)容是否構(gòu)成對匯編作品著作權(quán)的侵犯——對一起侵犯匯編作品著作權(quán)案的思考[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳軍;著作權(quán)保護(hù)中的利益平衡[D];西南政法大學(xué);2002年

2 趙成艷;匯編作品的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2420710