版權(quán)法體系下的“接觸權(quán)”研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-06 14:48
【摘要】：版權(quán)1作為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)體系的重要組成部分,其產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展都和人類科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步密切相關(guān)。而版權(quán)制度本身就是科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物。印刷術(shù)的發(fā)明,對(duì)作品的大量而節(jié)省費(fèi)用的復(fù)制成為了可能,2也就產(chǎn)生了版權(quán)保護(hù)的必要。3 版權(quán)制度產(chǎn)生之后,科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展總是對(duì)版權(quán)制度不斷提出挑戰(zhàn),而版權(quán)制度也在應(yīng)戰(zhàn)之中不斷發(fā)展完善。隨著技術(shù)手段的不斷革新以及信息擴(kuò)散日益加速,相比傳統(tǒng)的傳播手段,網(wǎng)絡(luò)從誕生的那一刻開(kāi)始就注定要引發(fā)一場(chǎng)轟轟烈烈的科技革命。網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展完成了知識(shí)的迅速傳播,建立了廣闊的網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)背景,豐富了知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代信息傳播的途徑。4知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專有權(quán)利的自身屬性和典型特征引發(fā)了深遠(yuǎn)的影響以及全方位的創(chuàng)新。5網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展使得公眾“接觸”作品變的越發(fā)容易。為了適應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)帶給版權(quán)作品保護(hù)的沖擊,版權(quán)權(quán)利人開(kāi)始對(duì)自己的作品施加“技術(shù)措施”予以保護(hù)。然而“技術(shù)措施”遠(yuǎn)不能一勞永逸地成為保護(hù)版權(quán)作品的最佳手段,于是,要求創(chuàng)設(shè)一項(xiàng)名為“接觸權(quán)”的呼聲逐漸興起。 針對(duì)版權(quán)法領(lǐng)域中有關(guān)“接觸權(quán)”存在與否的爭(zhēng)議,筆者在文章中進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述和論證。論文的第一章,筆者先是引入了對(duì)“接觸權(quán)”產(chǎn)生的背景以及其含義的介紹,直觀地將有關(guān)“接觸權(quán)”問(wèn)題的爭(zhēng)議展現(xiàn)給讀者,并且開(kāi)門見(jiàn)山地引入有關(guān)“接觸權(quán)”的不同的含義界定。同時(shí),筆者論述了當(dāng)下學(xué)者們對(duì)于“接觸權(quán)”創(chuàng)設(shè)的不同說(shuō)法,著重引入了相關(guān)支持者的立論。與此同時(shí),筆者將這些贊同的觀點(diǎn)同反對(duì)的意見(jiàn)予以橫向比較,駁斥了學(xué)者們堅(jiān)持的“接觸性技術(shù)措施是“接觸權(quán)”存在的基礎(chǔ)、以及“‘接觸權(quán)’是版權(quán)法專有權(quán)利體系的固有權(quán)利”的說(shuō)辭。同時(shí),澄清了有關(guān)學(xué)者對(duì)于“權(quán)利”和“權(quán)力”兩者之間在法理意義上的區(qū)別。第二章,論述“接觸權(quán)”不能納入版權(quán)法專有權(quán)利體系成為整篇論文的重點(diǎn)。在該部分,筆者采用了正面說(shuō)理以及反面批判的論證方式,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外發(fā)生的典型案例,批判了有關(guān)“接觸權(quán)”存在的法理依據(jù)和正當(dāng)理由在版權(quán)法專有權(quán)利體系下是難以立足的,從而說(shuō)明了有關(guān)“接觸權(quán)”存在的論調(diào)是難以自圓其說(shuō)的。無(wú)論是過(guò)去還是現(xiàn)在,或是將來(lái)的版權(quán)法體系都不可能接納“接觸權(quán)”成為其具體內(nèi)容。在文章的最后章節(jié),筆者立足于“接觸權(quán)”存在與否的爭(zhēng)論,發(fā)散地展開(kāi)思路,希望文章本身不僅僅停留在對(duì)于“接觸權(quán)”本身的認(rèn)識(shí)之上,通過(guò)對(duì)于國(guó)內(nèi)外案例的分析對(duì)比,以及對(duì)于創(chuàng)設(shè)“接觸權(quán)”于版權(quán)專有權(quán)利之下的批判,筆者希望本文可以對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的著作權(quán)法中的相關(guān)規(guī)定有所借鑒意義,無(wú)論是立法者還是學(xué)者們,都可以從中得到啟發(fā),以便更好地保證我國(guó)的版權(quán)法體系得以不斷地發(fā)展和完善。
[Abstract]:As an important part of intellectual property system, copyright 1 is closely related to the progress of human science and technology. The copyright system itself is the product of the development of science and technology. The invention of printing made it possible to reproduce a large number of works and save money, 2 which created the necessity of copyright protection. 3 since the emergence of copyright system, the development of science and technology has always challenged the copyright system. The copyright system is also in the face of constant development and improvement. With the continuous innovation of technological means and the acceleration of information diffusion, compared with the traditional means of communication, the network is destined to trigger a vigorous scientific and technological revolution from the moment of its birth. The rapid development of network technology has completed the rapid dissemination of knowledge and established a broad network technology background. It enriches the ways of information dissemination in the era of knowledge economy. 4 the own attributes and typical characteristics of proprietary rights of intellectual property rights have caused profound influence and all-round innovation. 5 the development of network technology makes the public "contact". The product becomes easier and easier. In order to adapt to the impact of network technology on the protection of copyright works, copyright owners began to impose "technical measures" to protect their works. However, "technical measures" are far from becoming the best means of protecting copyright works once and for all, so calls for the creation of a "right of access" have gradually arisen. In view of the dispute about the existence of "right of contact" in the field of copyright law, the author expounds and demonstrates it in detail. In the first chapter, the author introduces the background of "right of contact" and its meaning, and presents the controversy about "right of contact" to readers directly. And the introduction of the right of contact about the different meanings of the definition. At the same time, the author discusses the scholars' different views on the creation of the right of contact, and introduces the arguments of the relevant supporters. At the same time, the author compares these agreed views with the opposing views, refuting the scholars' insistence that "the contact technical measures are the basis of the existence of the" right of contact ". And "right of contact" is an inherent right of copyright law exclusive right system. At the same time, it clarifies the legal differences between right and power. The second chapter discusses that "right of contact" cannot be incorporated into the exclusive right system of copyright law. In this part, the author adopts positive reasoning and negative criticism, combined with the typical cases at home and abroad, This paper criticizes the legal basis and justification of the existence of "right of contact", which is difficult to establish under the system of exclusive rights of copyright law, and thus explains that the argument about the existence of "right of contact" is difficult to justify. It is impossible for the copyright law system to accept the right of contact as its concrete content, whether in the past, now, or in the future. In the last chapter of the article, the author bases himself on the debate about the existence of "right of contact" and spreads out his ideas, hoping that the article itself will not only remain on the understanding of "right of contact" itself, but also through the analysis and comparison of cases at home and abroad. As well as the criticism of the creation of "right of contact" under the exclusive right of copyright, the author hopes that this article can be used for reference to the relevant provisions of the current copyright law of our country, and that both legislators and scholars can get inspiration from it. In order to better ensure that China's copyright law system can continue to develop and improve.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
本文編號(hào)：2402936
[Abstract]:As an important part of intellectual property system, copyright 1 is closely related to the progress of human science and technology. The copyright system itself is the product of the development of science and technology. The invention of printing made it possible to reproduce a large number of works and save money, 2 which created the necessity of copyright protection. 3 since the emergence of copyright system, the development of science and technology has always challenged the copyright system. The copyright system is also in the face of constant development and improvement. With the continuous innovation of technological means and the acceleration of information diffusion, compared with the traditional means of communication, the network is destined to trigger a vigorous scientific and technological revolution from the moment of its birth. The rapid development of network technology has completed the rapid dissemination of knowledge and established a broad network technology background. It enriches the ways of information dissemination in the era of knowledge economy. 4 the own attributes and typical characteristics of proprietary rights of intellectual property rights have caused profound influence and all-round innovation. 5 the development of network technology makes the public "contact". The product becomes easier and easier. In order to adapt to the impact of network technology on the protection of copyright works, copyright owners began to impose "technical measures" to protect their works. However, "technical measures" are far from becoming the best means of protecting copyright works once and for all, so calls for the creation of a "right of access" have gradually arisen. In view of the dispute about the existence of "right of contact" in the field of copyright law, the author expounds and demonstrates it in detail. In the first chapter, the author introduces the background of "right of contact" and its meaning, and presents the controversy about "right of contact" to readers directly. And the introduction of the right of contact about the different meanings of the definition. At the same time, the author discusses the scholars' different views on the creation of the right of contact, and introduces the arguments of the relevant supporters. At the same time, the author compares these agreed views with the opposing views, refuting the scholars' insistence that "the contact technical measures are the basis of the existence of the" right of contact ". And "right of contact" is an inherent right of copyright law exclusive right system. At the same time, it clarifies the legal differences between right and power. The second chapter discusses that "right of contact" cannot be incorporated into the exclusive right system of copyright law. In this part, the author adopts positive reasoning and negative criticism, combined with the typical cases at home and abroad, This paper criticizes the legal basis and justification of the existence of "right of contact", which is difficult to establish under the system of exclusive rights of copyright law, and thus explains that the argument about the existence of "right of contact" is difficult to justify. It is impossible for the copyright law system to accept the right of contact as its concrete content, whether in the past, now, or in the future. In the last chapter of the article, the author bases himself on the debate about the existence of "right of contact" and spreads out his ideas, hoping that the article itself will not only remain on the understanding of "right of contact" itself, but also through the analysis and comparison of cases at home and abroad. As well as the criticism of the creation of "right of contact" under the exclusive right of copyright, the author hopes that this article can be used for reference to the relevant provisions of the current copyright law of our country, and that both legislators and scholars can get inspiration from it. In order to better ensure that China's copyright law system can continue to develop and improve.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 熊琦;;論“接觸權(quán)”——著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)類型化的不足與克服[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年05期
2 彭學(xué)龍;;論著作權(quán)語(yǔ)境下的獲取權(quán)[J];法商研究;2010年04期
3 欒東福;;論著作人身權(quán)中作者的接觸權(quán)[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2010年03期
4 陳嵐;;權(quán)力與權(quán)利的界說(shuō)[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期
5 王遷;對(duì)技術(shù)措施立法保護(hù)的比較研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 劉楠;技術(shù)措施的濫用和規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
，本文編號(hào)：2402936
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2402936.html
最近更新
教材專著
