【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)自20世紀(jì)60年代進(jìn)入中國以來，已經(jīng)飛速地影響著人民群眾生活的方方面面。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的日新月異，著作權(quán)人的作品被迅速數(shù)字化，通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)無償且便利地被他人復(fù)制、傳播。由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)消除了地域限制，，在信息爆炸的網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界，著作權(quán)人時(shí)刻面臨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的威脅。如何順應(yīng)著作權(quán)的國際保護(hù)趨勢，通過刑事立法滿足大量著作權(quán)人對網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的保護(hù)需求，無疑對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的理論發(fā)展具有重要意義。本文以提出問題、分析問題、解決問題為基本脈絡(luò)，在對網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)刑法保護(hù)若干問題進(jìn)行剖析探討的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了完善我國著作權(quán)犯罪的初步設(shè)想。 正文由三章內(nèi)容構(gòu)成： 第一章是網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)刑法保護(hù)中“以營利為目的”的立法廢除研究。本部分首先將著作權(quán)犯罪中“以營利為目的”在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下出現(xiàn)的滯后性作為問題提出。其次將“以營利為目的”在理論上的存廢分歧進(jìn)行分類匯總并對其背后的法理進(jìn)行剖析。最后對保全論和廢除論進(jìn)行評判，得出應(yīng)根據(jù)著作權(quán)犯罪的不同類型對上述兩種觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行揚(yáng)棄，以提升我國著作權(quán)的保護(hù)水平。 第二章是網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)刑法保護(hù)中網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為定性研究。共由三部分組成，第一部分是在闡述網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播定性為復(fù)制發(fā)行的產(chǎn)生過程的基礎(chǔ)上，從司法解釋造成的民刑沖突和理論界的分歧兩個(gè)方面，對網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的刑法定性變化及其沖突進(jìn)行探討；第二部分主要是對網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為與復(fù)制發(fā)行的行為界限進(jìn)行探討；第三部分是從國外法的借鑒和國內(nèi)法的保護(hù)現(xiàn)實(shí)出發(fā)探討我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為刑法規(guī)制的出路。 第三章是網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)刑法保護(hù)中私服外掛的立法增設(shè)研究。本部分首先對私服外掛行為進(jìn)行概述，并對其危害以及法律規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行介紹，說明其在目前刑法中存在規(guī)制缺失的現(xiàn)實(shí)。其次通過對私服外掛的危害闡述以及其他部門法的規(guī)制不力來說明通過刑法規(guī)制的必要。最后從我國著作權(quán)犯罪刑事立法角度出發(fā)提出對私服、外掛刑事規(guī)制的立法設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:Since entering China in the 1960's, the Internet has been affecting all aspects of people's life at full speed. With the rapid development of network technology, the works of copyright owners are quickly digitized, copied and disseminated by others without charge and convenience through the network. In the information explosion world, copyright owners are always facing the threat of cybercrime because of the elimination of regional restrictions. How to comply with the international protection trend of copyright and satisfy the need of network copyright protection for a large number of copyright owners through criminal legislation is undoubtedly of great significance to the theoretical development of intellectual property crime. Based on the basic context of putting forward, analyzing and solving problems, this paper puts forward a tentative plan to perfect the copyright crime in our country on the basis of analyzing and discussing several problems of criminal law protection of copyright under the network environment. The text is composed of three chapters: the first chapter is the legislative repeal of "profit for profit" in the criminal law protection of network copyright. In this part, the problem of "profit for profit" in the network environment is put forward. Secondly, the paper classifies and summarizes the theoretical differences of existence and abolition of profit and analyzes the legal principles behind it. Finally, the preservation theory and the abrogation theory are judged, and it is concluded that the above two viewpoints should be sublate according to the different types of copyright crime in order to enhance the level of copyright protection in our country. The second chapter is the qualitative study of network communication behavior in the criminal law protection of network copyright. It is composed of three parts. The first part is on the basis of expounding the process that network communication is characterized as reproduction and distribution, from two aspects: civil and criminal conflicts caused by judicial interpretation and differences in theoretical circles. This paper probes into the qualitative change of criminal law and its conflict in the behavior of network communication. The second part mainly discusses the boundary between the behavior of network communication and the behavior of reproduction and distribution; the third part discusses the way out of the criminal law regulation of the behavior of network communication in our country from the reference of foreign law and the reality of protection of domestic law. The third chapter is the network copyright in the criminal law protection of private service add-in legislation. This part firstly summarizes the behavior of private service, introduces its harm and the current situation of legal regulation, and explains the reality of its lack of regulation in the current criminal law. Secondly, it explains the necessity of the regulation by criminal law by expounding the harm of private service and the weak regulation of other laws. Finally, from the angle of criminal legislation of copyright crime in our country, the author puts forward the legislative idea of private service and external criminal regulation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D924.3;D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳儒丹;;WTO規(guī)則與中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法——以美國訴中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法措施案為背景[J];北方法學(xué);2008年04期

2 王遷;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中版權(quán)直接侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定[J];東方法學(xué);2009年02期

3 曹剛,周詳;論侵犯著作權(quán)罪——兼論相關(guān)刑法條文的修改[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年09期

4 許其勇;;論經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的刑民一體化模式——從著作權(quán)犯罪切入[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

5 姚品超;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲外掛的刑法規(guī)制之反思——兼論刑法第二百七十六條在網(wǎng)絡(luò)背景下的新解釋與適用[J];法制與社會;2011年04期

6 管瑞哲;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑法保護(hù)問題[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

7 朱文菊;;淺論“私服”的刑法規(guī)制及查處難度(下)[J];法制與社會;2010年17期

8 張獻(xiàn)偉;論手機(jī)鈴聲的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];河北法學(xué);2004年08期

9 高榮林;;論侵犯著作權(quán)罪“以營利為目的”的哲學(xué)依據(jù)[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

10 孫萬懷;侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪刑事責(zé)任基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)造比較[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 萬冬朝;電子書版權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

2 明兆娟;論侵犯著作權(quán)罪[D];中國人民大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2380515