【摘要】：卡通角色采用藝術(shù)的手法塑造其形象,凝聚了作者的心血和勞動,并獲得了社會的高度認同和成為傳承和弘揚文化的重要載體。但是,卡通角色通常負載于其他作品,各國傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)法都沒有明確規(guī)定卡通角色的著作權(quán)保護。適應(yīng)文化的發(fā)展和保護權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益,美國、日本等已經(jīng)在司法判例中建構(gòu)了卡通角色的著作權(quán)保護。在我國大力倡導(dǎo)文化事業(yè)發(fā)展的當代,作為文化重要載體的卡通角色,卻因為我國著作權(quán)法不完備和卡通角色的商業(yè)價值“激勵”而屢屢被侵權(quán),并面臨難以獲得充分救濟的尷尬境地。因此,完善我國著作權(quán)法對卡通角色的法律保護,鼓勵創(chuàng)作優(yōu)秀的卡通角色、傳承優(yōu)秀文化具有重要的理論價值和現(xiàn)實意義。 卡通角色是作者的創(chuàng)造,由于其具有獨創(chuàng)性和構(gòu)成了獨立的表達,所以,卡通角色滿足了著作權(quán)法上作品的要求,應(yīng)當獲得著作權(quán)的保護。同時,卡通角色的著作權(quán)保護可以彌補商標權(quán)、專利權(quán)和反不正當競爭法保護的不足,從而有效的保護權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益和促進以卡通角色為載體的文化事業(yè)的發(fā)展。但是,反思我國著作權(quán)法,尤其是結(jié)合我國司法實踐中有關(guān)卡通角色相關(guān)案例,我國著作權(quán)法沒有明確規(guī)定卡通角色為作品,因此,在司法實踐中,卡通角色的獨創(chuàng)性缺乏明確的標準,即使認可卡通角色的著作權(quán),其權(quán)利內(nèi)容也非常模糊。此外,即使司法裁判中確認了卡通角色著作權(quán),其救濟也不夠充分。美國、日本等在司法實踐中明確了卡通角色著作權(quán)的保護,并且對卡通角色的“獨創(chuàng)性”沒有設(shè)置過高的門檻,從而有效的保護了創(chuàng)作者,也有力的推動了文化的進步。我國典型的卡通角色相關(guān)案件充分表明,隨著技術(shù)的發(fā)展和商業(yè)市場的擴大,卡通角色侵權(quán)將會日益嚴重,因此,保護卡通角色著作權(quán)已經(jīng)非常迫切。 因此,完善我國著作權(quán)法對卡通角色的保護,應(yīng)該成為卡通角色保護最有力的保障。為此,我國著作權(quán)法應(yīng)該明確卡通角色的作品地位,并完善卡通角色之復(fù)制、發(fā)行和合理使用的法律制度。誠然,在我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展和文化進步的過程中卡通角色的保護還有賴于商標權(quán)、專利權(quán)和反不正當競爭法共同架構(gòu)卡通角色的法律保護,以及司法裁判合理的平衡卡通角色著作權(quán)保護的邊界。
[Abstract]:Cartoon characters use artistic techniques to shape their images, condense the author's painstaking efforts and labor, and gain a high degree of social identity and become an important carrier to inherit and carry forward culture. However, cartoon characters are usually loaded with other works, and the copyright protection of cartoon characters is not clearly stipulated in the traditional copyright laws of various countries. Adapting to the development of culture and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders, the United States and Japan have constructed the copyright protection of cartoon characters in judicial precedents. In the contemporary era of advocating the development of cultural cause, cartoon characters, as an important carrier of culture, are frequently infringed because of the imperfection of copyright law and the commercial value of cartoon characters. And faced with the embarrassment of obtaining adequate relief. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to perfect the legal protection of cartoon characters in China's copyright law, to encourage the creation of excellent cartoon characters and to inherit excellent culture. Cartoon character is the creation of author. Because of its originality and independent expression, cartoon character meets the requirements of copyright law and should be protected by copyright. At the same time, the copyright protection of cartoon characters can make up for the shortcomings of trademark rights, patent rights and anti-unfair competition law protection, thus effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the obligee and promote the development of cultural undertakings with cartoon characters as the carrier. However, reflecting on the copyright law of our country, especially in the light of the relevant cases of cartoon characters in our judicial practice, the copyright law of our country has not explicitly stipulated cartoon characters as works, therefore, in judicial practice, The originality of cartoon characters lacks clear standards, even if the copyright of cartoon characters is recognized, the content of their rights is very vague. Moreover, even if the copyright of cartoon character is confirmed in the judicial decision, the remedy is not enough. In judicial practice, the United States and Japan have made clear the protection of the copyright of cartoon characters, and the "originality" of cartoon characters has not set too high a threshold, thus effectively protecting the creators and promoting the progress of culture. Typical cartoon character related cases in China show that with the development of technology and the expansion of commercial market, cartoon character infringement will become more and more serious. Therefore, it is very urgent to protect the copyright of cartoon character. Therefore, perfecting the protection of cartoon characters in China's copyright law should be the most powerful protection for cartoon characters. Therefore, the copyright law of our country should clarify the status of cartoon characters and perfect the legal system of reproduction, distribution and rational use of cartoon characters. Indeed, in the process of economic development and cultural progress in China, the protection of cartoon characters also depends on the legal protection of cartoon characters under the common structure of trademark rights, patent rights and anti-unfair competition law. And the judicial judgment reasonable balance cartoon character copyright protection boundary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董炳和;論形象權(quán)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1998年04期

2 余俊;論商品化權(quán)之權(quán)利歸屬——商品化權(quán)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)關(guān)系之考量[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年09期

3 郭曉紅;;知名形象商品化法律問題研究[J];法律適用;2007年07期

4 駱電;;傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)法上創(chuàng)造性要求面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與回應(yīng)[J];法律適用;2010年05期

5 熊琦;;論著作權(quán)合理使用制度的適用范圍[J];法學(xué)家;2011年01期

6 馮曉青;付繼存;;著作權(quán)法中的復(fù)制權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)家;2011年03期

7 李偉文;論著作權(quán)客體之獨創(chuàng)性[J];法學(xué)評論;2000年01期

8 吳漢東;形象的商品化與商品化的形象權(quán)[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

9 張丹丹;;著作權(quán)法在保護虛構(gòu)角色形象方面的局限及對策[J];法學(xué);2010年04期

10 孫作范;淺析卡通藝術(shù)角色塑造[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃杰;日本卡通商品消費機制研究[D];西南大學(xué);2006年

2 徐超;論動漫形象商品化權(quán)的法律保護[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

3 汪益平;論形象權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2354960