【摘要】： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的參與者一般分為網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者和網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者�，F(xiàn)行的立法和司法實踐均普遍將歸責(zé)的重點置于網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者,而對于網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者的責(zé)任一筆帶過。理由是在我國現(xiàn)行的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定中將網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者和網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者認(rèn)定為共同侵權(quán),而在共同侵權(quán)中,原告有權(quán)選擇起訴對象。因此,出于賠償實務(wù)的角度出發(fā),原告往往選擇那些網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)機構(gòu),以期得到可觀的賠償。而在現(xiàn)實的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件中,網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者一般是侵權(quán)行為實施的主體,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者只是為其行為提供環(huán)境因素,且很多情況下,對前者的侵權(quán)行為不知情。從侵權(quán)法的一般原理,共同侵權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)是出于共同故意。所以,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)者承擔(dān)主要責(zé)任的立法是有問題的。 在上述的現(xiàn)實下,我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)規(guī)定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán),網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件所圍繞的核心也基于這一權(quán)利。然而,紛繁蕪雜的網(wǎng)絡(luò)案件中,在著作權(quán)的侵害上,除了網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)之外,實際上還涉及到諸多其他權(quán)利。這里包括一些傳統(tǒng)的著作權(quán)權(quán)能,如發(fā)行權(quán)、復(fù)制權(quán)等,還同時涉及了一些網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下新的權(quán)能,如權(quán)利標(biāo)識權(quán)等。并且在新的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下,新的作品也展現(xiàn)出了一些區(qū)別于傳統(tǒng)作品的特點。如上所述,新的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境將產(chǎn)生著作權(quán)的一些新的權(quán)能。而傳統(tǒng)的將網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)單一地劃歸為傳統(tǒng)作品的著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)能的做法有待商榷。 本文立足于網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境的特色,以建立新的網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品的著作權(quán)制度為基礎(chǔ),探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中,網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者的責(zé)任。認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)清網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品與傳統(tǒng)作品的不同,賦予網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳播權(quán)清晰的含義,并補充一些新的權(quán)能,使這些權(quán)利共同構(gòu)筑成網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)。從而可以清晰地明辨網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息提供者在侵權(quán)案件中的責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Participants in the network environment are generally divided into network information providers and network service providers. The current legislation and judicial practice generally focus on the network service provider, and the responsibility of the network information provider. The reason is that the network information provider and the network service provider are regarded as joint infringement in the current network tort cognizance in our country, and in the joint infringement, the plaintiff has the right to choose the suing object. Therefore, from the perspective of compensation practice, plaintiffs often choose those network services, in order to get substantial compensation. In the actual network infringement cases, the network information provider is generally the main body of the infringement, the network service provider only provides the environmental factors for its behavior, and in many cases, the former does not know about the infringement. From the general principle of tort law, joint infringement should be out of common intent. So, the legislation that network service person undertakes primary responsibility is problematic. In the above mentioned reality, the network tort in our country stipulates the network communication right, and the core of the network infringement case is also based on this right. However, in the numerous network cases, the infringement of copyright, in addition to the right to spread on the Internet, actually involves many other rights. This includes some traditional copyright rights, such as distribution rights, reproduction rights and so on, but also involves some new power under the network environment, such as the right to identify rights. And in the new network environment, the new works also show some characteristics different from the traditional works. As mentioned above, the new network environment will produce some new power of copyright. However, the traditional method of classifying the right of network dissemination as the property right of traditional works is open to question. Based on the characteristics of network environment and the establishment of new copyright system of network works, this paper discusses the responsibility of network information providers in network infringement. The author holds that it is necessary to recognize the difference between network works and traditional works, to give clear meaning to network information dissemination right, and to add some new powers, so that these rights can be constructed into network copyright together. Thus, the responsibility of network information providers in infringement cases can be clearly identified.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923.41

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉偉;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者傳播侵權(quán)內(nèi)容行為的認(rèn)定與責(zé)任[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2326424