【摘要】： 數(shù)字環(huán)境下隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)與信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上的信息量迅速膨脹,而便捷的數(shù)字化形態(tài)使復(fù)制、傳播變得輕而易舉,正是這種便捷性增強(qiáng)了侵權(quán)的范圍和程度,盜版和非法使用嚴(yán)重影響了著作權(quán)人的利益。面對(duì)相對(duì)高昂的司法維權(quán)成本,版權(quán)人更青睞于利用技術(shù)保護(hù)措施控制他人未經(jīng)許可對(duì)作品的訪問(wèn)與使用。世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)組織和主要國(guó)家也將對(duì)技術(shù)措施的法律保護(hù)納入版權(quán)保護(hù)范圍。但是,法律對(duì)技術(shù)措施的保護(hù)又引發(fā)了新的制度沖突,它對(duì)于昔日作為版權(quán)人與社會(huì)公眾利益的最佳調(diào)節(jié)器的合理使用制度造成沖擊,破壞了傳統(tǒng)版權(quán)法中已經(jīng)形成的版權(quán)人與社會(huì)公眾的利益平衡。因此,各國(guó)在其對(duì)技術(shù)措施的法律保護(hù)中也規(guī)定了規(guī)避技術(shù)措施的例外情形。我國(guó)對(duì)于技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的立法起步較晚,有很多不盡完善的地方。本文主要采用案例分析法、歸納分析法與比較分析法闡明技術(shù)保護(hù)措施相關(guān)的法律問(wèn)題,技術(shù)保護(hù)措施與合理使用的融合,并在比較其他各主要國(guó)家立法現(xiàn)狀基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)于我國(guó)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的版權(quán)法保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀分析并提出建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network technology and information technology in the digital environment, the amount of information on the Internet expands rapidly, and the convenient digital form makes replication and dissemination easy. It is this convenience that enhances the scope and extent of infringement. Piracy and illegal use seriously affect the interests of copyright owners. Faced with the relatively high cost of judicial protection, copyright owners prefer to use technical protection measures to control the unauthorized access and use of works by others. The World intellectual property Organization and major countries have also included legal protection of technical measures within the scope of copyright protection. However, the protection of technical measures by law has caused a new institutional conflict, which has impacted on the system of rational use of the best regulator for the interests of copyright owners and the public in the past. Damaged the traditional copyright law has formed the interests of copyright owners and the public balance. Therefore, in their legal protection of technical measures, the exception of circumvention of technical measures is also stipulated. China's legislation on technical protection measures started late, there are a lot of imperfect places. This paper mainly uses case analysis method, inductive analysis method and comparative analysis method to clarify the legal problems related to technical protection measures, the integration of technical protection measures and rational use, On the basis of comparing the legislative status of other major countries, this paper analyzes and puts forward some suggestions on the copyright protection of technology protection measures in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃驥;數(shù)字環(huán)境下技術(shù)措施保護(hù)與著作權(quán)合理使用制度的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 沈昕怡;版權(quán)技術(shù)措施法律問(wèn)題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年

3 樊珊珊;論版權(quán)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施的法律規(guī)制[D];重慶大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2306615