發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-24 18:57

【摘要】：我國傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)經(jīng)過多年持續(xù)高速增長,已經(jīng)發(fā)展為具有一定規(guī)模的產(chǎn)業(yè),然而這一過程中也伴隨著諸多問題,其中由于版權(quán)保護(hù)缺位引致的版權(quán)侵權(quán)問題尤為嚴(yán)峻。以往的國內(nèi)研究或者僅測算全國或各地區(qū)版權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度,或者僅就版權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)的影響進(jìn)行定性分析或描述統(tǒng)計(jì),缺乏對(duì)兩者數(shù)量關(guān)系的深入研究。因此對(duì)我國版權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度進(jìn)行科學(xué)的、令人信服的評(píng)估,進(jìn)而采用規(guī)范的定量分析方法研究其對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)的影響是十分有必要的。 本研究以1978-2012年我國版權(quán)保護(hù)與傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)為研究對(duì)象,構(gòu)建由立法強(qiáng)度和執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度兩個(gè)維度組成、涵蓋多個(gè)指標(biāo)的指標(biāo)體系評(píng)估版權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度。通過理論模型分析版權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)的影響機(jī)制,繼而采用計(jì)量分析方法對(duì)模型得出的命題進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,為了對(duì)問題有更深入的認(rèn)識(shí),本研究分別分析了立法強(qiáng)度和執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)影響的方向和程度,以期得到更具現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)意義的結(jié)論。 研究結(jié)果表明,總體而言,版權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)產(chǎn)量、利潤有正向促進(jìn)作用,且邊際作用遞減；版權(quán)保護(hù)立法強(qiáng)度對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)產(chǎn)量、利潤有正向促進(jìn)作用；版權(quán)保護(hù)執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版業(yè)產(chǎn)量、利潤有正向促進(jìn)作用,且邊際作用遞增�？梢姮F(xiàn)階段仍有必要采取措施提高版權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度,而從提高執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度的角度展開,有可能是事半功倍的。 文章也對(duì)本研究就行了反思,并在最后提出了針對(duì)性的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:China's traditional publishing industry has developed into a certain scale industry after years of sustained and rapid growth. However, there are many problems in this process, especially the copyright infringement caused by the absence of copyright protection. Previous domestic studies have only measured the intensity of copyright protection in China or in various regions, or only carried out qualitative analysis or descriptive statistics on the impact of copyright protection on the traditional publishing industry, but lack of in-depth research on the quantitative relationship between the two. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the intensity of copyright protection in China scientifically and convincingly, and then to study the influence of copyright protection on traditional publishing industry by means of normative quantitative analysis. This study takes the copyright protection and traditional publishing industry in China from 1978 to 2012 as the research object, and constructs an index system to evaluate the copyright protection intensity, which consists of two dimensions: legislative intensity and enforcement intensity. This paper analyzes the influence mechanism of copyright protection on traditional publishing industry through theoretical model, and then uses econometric analysis method to test the propositions obtained by the model. On this basis, in order to have a deeper understanding of the problem, this study analyzes the direction and extent of the impact of legislative intensity and law enforcement intensity on the traditional publishing industry respectively, in order to obtain a more realistic and instructive conclusion. The results show that, in general, the intensity of copyright protection has a positive effect on the output of the traditional publishing industry, and the marginal effect is decreasing, and the intensity of copyright protection legislation has a positive effect on the output and profit of the traditional publishing industry. The enforcement intensity of copyright protection has a positive effect on the output and profit of traditional publishing industry, and the marginal effect is increasing. We can see that it is necessary to take measures to improve the intensity of copyright protection at the present stage, and from the angle of enhancing the intensity of law enforcement, it is possible to achieve twice the result with half the effort. The article also reflects on this study and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions at the end.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G239.2-F;F204;D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王爭;;專利制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究綜述[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

2 張志成,李治堂;我國圖書發(fā)行業(yè)市場結(jié)構(gòu)、行為與績效分析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2003年12期

3 劉蔚綏;出版產(chǎn)業(yè)的概念及特征辨析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2005年06期

4 葉新;姚宇聰;;對(duì)2005年我國版權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2007年09期

5 周玉波;田常清;;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視野下的圖書出版業(yè)問題探析[J];出版科學(xué);2010年03期

6 董鈺;孫赫;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新影響的定量分析——以高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)為例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年04期

7 王華;;更嚴(yán)厲的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度有利于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新嗎?[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年S2期

8 史晉川;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件盜竊案中廠商收益損失確定的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1996年11期

9 姚頡靖;彭輝;;版權(quán)保護(hù)與版權(quán)貿(mào)易關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于56個(gè)國家和地區(qū)的數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];科技與法律;2011年01期

10 洪勇;吳勇;;發(fā)展中國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)程度相對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2011年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 曾慶賓;中國出版產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2003年

2 張梅;政治學(xué)視野中的中國版權(quán)保護(hù)問題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

3 孫洪軍;日本出版產(chǎn)業(yè)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

4 易健雄;技術(shù)發(fā)展與版權(quán)擴(kuò)張[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

5 許春明;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的機(jī)制研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2008年

6 李正生;中國版權(quán)制度與版權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李濤;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與侵權(quán)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];中南大學(xué);2006年

2 劉緒衡;現(xiàn)代網(wǎng)絡(luò)出版對(duì)傳統(tǒng)出版的影響及出版社的應(yīng)變策略[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年

3 周麗;商標(biāo)侵權(quán)問題的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2292261