【摘要】：在《中國(guó)土壤與肥料》稿件的評(píng)審、編校和對(duì)已發(fā)表論文的審讀時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)一些論文中多重比較存在方法誤用、結(jié)果表達(dá)缺陷和錯(cuò)誤以及結(jié)果分析不夠嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)和深入等問題。本文結(jié)合一些實(shí)例剖析了上述問題及其產(chǎn)生原因,并提出相應(yīng)的修正措施。為避免此類問題再次出現(xiàn),建議編輯加強(qiáng)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)知識(shí)學(xué)習(xí),強(qiáng)化統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)內(nèi)容審核,建立期刊統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)審核標(biāo)準(zhǔn),依照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)范論文寫作與修改。
[Abstract]:In the review, editing and reading of Chinese soil and Fertilizer, it is found that the multiple comparisons in some papers have some problems, such as the misuse of methods, the defects and errors in the expression of the results, and the lack of rigorous and in-depth analysis of the results. In this paper, some examples are given to analyze the above problems and their causes, and the corresponding correction measures are put forward. In order to avoid the recurrence of such problems, it is suggested that editors should strengthen the study of statistical knowledge, strengthen the audit of statistical contents, establish standards for statistical audit of periodicals, and standardize the writing and revision of papers according to the standards.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院農(nóng)業(yè)資源與農(nóng)業(yè)區(qū)劃研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：G232

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 ;歡迎訂閱2001年《土壤肥料》[J];磷肥與復(fù)肥;2000年05期

2 ;《土壤肥料》致讀者、作者和廣告廠家[J];土壤肥料;2000年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2240892