【摘要】：文章采用實(shí)驗(yàn)方法,對(duì)幼兒使用平板電腦(PAD)與紙書所體現(xiàn)的閱讀能力進(jìn)行比較研究。實(shí)驗(yàn)將閱讀材料分為普通電子書、交互式電子書、紙書三類,將幼兒分為有PAD閱讀經(jīng)驗(yàn)和無(wú)PAD閱讀經(jīng)驗(yàn)兩組,進(jìn)行交叉對(duì)比。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):介質(zhì)不是影響閱讀能力的根本原因,紙書與交互式電子書對(duì)兒童閱讀能力的影響沒有明顯區(qū)別;不同類型的電子書形態(tài)對(duì)閱讀能力具有顯著影響,使用交互式電子書比普通電子書所取得的成績(jī)更好;數(shù)字閱讀經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)兒童閱讀能力沒有顯著影響。
[Abstract]:In this paper, a comparative study was made on the reading ability of children using (PAD) and paper books. The reading materials were divided into three groups: common e-book, interactive e-book and paper book. The children were divided into two groups: PAD reading experience and no PAD reading experience. It is found that the media is not the fundamental reason for the reading ability, and there is no significant difference between the paper books and the interactive e-books on the reading ability of children, and the different types of e-books have a significant effect on the reading ability. Using interactive e-books is better than ordinary e-books; digital reading experience has no significant effect on children's reading ability.
【作者單位】： 上海理工大學(xué);上海市閔行區(qū)發(fā)改委;上海綠地世紀(jì)城幼兒園;
【基金】：上海市哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃基金“數(shù)字閱讀對(duì)兒童閱讀能力的影響研究”(2012BTQ002)研究成果 上海理工大學(xué)人文社科攀登計(jì)劃“平板電腦對(duì)兒童閱讀習(xí)慣與興趣的影響及引導(dǎo)策略研究”(15HJPD-A03)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：G237.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;40億元是電紙書市場(chǎng)規(guī)模瓶頸[J];電子元件與材料;2010年05期

2 潘治;;“電紙書”霧里看花[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2205282