職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-17 07:12
【摘要】：英國哲學(xué)家洛克說過：作者在創(chuàng)作作品時花費的時間和勞動,與其他勞動成果的創(chuàng)作人的花費沒有什么不同,因此作品也應(yīng)當(dāng)像其他勞動成品一樣,獲得應(yīng)有的報酬。在強調(diào)物質(zhì)文明和精神文明并行發(fā)展的今天,凝結(jié)著作者智力勞動的作品的保護愈來愈受到重視,而職務(wù)作品作為著作權(quán)法中特殊的一類作品更應(yīng)當(dāng)受到保護。但是由于職務(wù)作品自身具有復(fù)雜性和特殊性,我國在對職務(wù)作品的認定、職務(wù)作品的著作權(quán)歸屬和職務(wù)作品的利益平衡等方面存在著很大的法律漏洞和法律空白。更何況隨著當(dāng)今社會信息高度的發(fā)展,新問題和新情況依然不斷出現(xiàn)�？墒�,我國在2001年的《著作權(quán)法》修改中幾乎沒有涉及職務(wù)作品制度,所以至今我們在司法實踐中解決關(guān)于職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)的問題實際上依據(jù)的是1990年著作權(quán)法中職務(wù)作品的規(guī)定。因此,關(guān)于職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度所存在的問題必須亟待解決。本文中,筆者通過由淺入深的分析和思考提出了一些自己的看法。 第一部分,對我國職務(wù)作品的基本理論進行了闡述。先是介紹了我國職務(wù)作品的概念、認定的要件,進而又與相關(guān)特殊作品逐一進行比較,并指出其不同點,從而對職務(wù)作品有了一些基本的認識和了解。 第二部分,與其他國家職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度進行了比較研究。在以“財產(chǎn)價值觀”為核心的“版權(quán)體系”和以“人格價值觀”為核心的“作者權(quán)體系”理論基礎(chǔ)上,通過具體比較和分析這些國家職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度的合理性和先進性,以便能夠為我國所學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒。 第三部分,揭露了當(dāng)前我國職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度存在的問題。如職務(wù)作品的定義模糊,職務(wù)作品創(chuàng)作人權(quán)利沒有保障,單位在職務(wù)作品中權(quán)利過大等,如果對這些問題繼續(xù)放任,最終會抑制文化科學(xué)事業(yè)的繁榮與發(fā)展。 第四部分,提出了一些職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度的完善對策。首先,筆者認為應(yīng)當(dāng)明確職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度中應(yīng)堅持的三大基本原則,即創(chuàng)作人保護原則、利益均衡原則和目的讓與原則。在此前提下,再通過對相關(guān)概念的明晰、利益分享機制的建立等措施來完善職務(wù)作品著作權(quán)制度。
[Abstract]:The British philosopher John Locke once said: the author spends no different time and labor in the creation of his work than the creator of other labor achievements. Therefore, the work should be paid as well as any other finished work. Today, with the parallel development of material civilization and spiritual civilization, more and more attention has been paid to the protection of the author's works of intellectual labor, while the official works, as a special kind of works in copyright law, should be protected more and more. However, due to the complexity and particularity of the job work itself, there are a lot of legal loopholes and legal gaps in the recognition of the job work, the ownership of the copyright of the job work and the balance of the interests of the job work in our country. Moreover, with the development of social information, new problems and new situations are still emerging. However, in the revision of the copyright Law in 2001, there was hardly any reference to the system of job-related works in our country. So far, we have solved the problem of copyright in the judicial practice according to the provisions of the copyright Law of 1990. Therefore, the problems existing in the copyright system of job works must be solved urgently. In this paper, the author puts forward some views by analyzing and thinking from shallow to deep. The first part expounds the basic theory of our country's post works. First of all, it introduces the concept of our country's official works, the elements of identification, and then compares them one by one with the relevant special works, and points out their differences, so as to have some basic understanding and understanding of the post works. In the second part, the author makes a comparative study on the copyright system of the post works in other countries. On the basis of the theory of "copyright system" with "property value" as the core and "author's right system" with "personality value" as the core, this paper compares and analyzes the rationality and advanced nature of the copyright system of these national official works. In order to be able to learn and learn from our country. The third part reveals the problems existing in the copyright system of our country. If the definition of the job work is vague, the right of the creator of the job work is not guaranteed, and the right of the unit in the post work is too large, if these problems continue to be allowed, the prosperity and development of the cultural and scientific cause will eventually be restrained. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some countermeasures to perfect the copyright system of the post works. First of all, the author thinks that three basic principles should be clearly defined in the copyright system of official works, that is, the principle of the protection of the creator, the principle of balance of interests and the principle of transfer of purpose. Under this premise, through the clarity of related concepts, the establishment of benefit-sharing mechanism and other measures to improve the copyright system of job works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.41
本文編號：2129547
[Abstract]:The British philosopher John Locke once said: the author spends no different time and labor in the creation of his work than the creator of other labor achievements. Therefore, the work should be paid as well as any other finished work. Today, with the parallel development of material civilization and spiritual civilization, more and more attention has been paid to the protection of the author's works of intellectual labor, while the official works, as a special kind of works in copyright law, should be protected more and more. However, due to the complexity and particularity of the job work itself, there are a lot of legal loopholes and legal gaps in the recognition of the job work, the ownership of the copyright of the job work and the balance of the interests of the job work in our country. Moreover, with the development of social information, new problems and new situations are still emerging. However, in the revision of the copyright Law in 2001, there was hardly any reference to the system of job-related works in our country. So far, we have solved the problem of copyright in the judicial practice according to the provisions of the copyright Law of 1990. Therefore, the problems existing in the copyright system of job works must be solved urgently. In this paper, the author puts forward some views by analyzing and thinking from shallow to deep. The first part expounds the basic theory of our country's post works. First of all, it introduces the concept of our country's official works, the elements of identification, and then compares them one by one with the relevant special works, and points out their differences, so as to have some basic understanding and understanding of the post works. In the second part, the author makes a comparative study on the copyright system of the post works in other countries. On the basis of the theory of "copyright system" with "property value" as the core and "author's right system" with "personality value" as the core, this paper compares and analyzes the rationality and advanced nature of the copyright system of these national official works. In order to be able to learn and learn from our country. The third part reveals the problems existing in the copyright system of our country. If the definition of the job work is vague, the right of the creator of the job work is not guaranteed, and the right of the unit in the post work is too large, if these problems continue to be allowed, the prosperity and development of the cultural and scientific cause will eventually be restrained. In the fourth part, the author puts forward some countermeasures to perfect the copyright system of the post works. First of all, the author thinks that three basic principles should be clearly defined in the copyright system of official works, that is, the principle of the protection of the creator, the principle of balance of interests and the principle of transfer of purpose. Under this premise, through the clarity of related concepts, the establishment of benefit-sharing mechanism and other measures to improve the copyright system of job works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.41
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 馮曉青;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法目的與利益平衡研究[J];南都學(xué)壇;2004年03期
2 邱國俠,張紅生;試析法人作品與職務(wù)作品的區(qū)分標準[J];河北法學(xué);2004年02期
3 王芳;論職務(wù)作品的界定及其著作權(quán)的歸屬[J];科技與出版;2005年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張莎莎;職務(wù)作品創(chuàng)作人權(quán)利及其保護[D];華中科技大學(xué);2005年
，本文編號：2129547
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2129547.html
最近更新
教材專著
