發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-06 20:22

  本文選題：開(kāi)放存取期刊 + 學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量�。� 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2010年博士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)末,數(shù)字出版的發(fā)展、開(kāi)放共享的出版理念、簡(jiǎn)化的出版流程、自助的出版方式和快捷的出版周期,使得開(kāi)放存取(OA)期刊迅速風(fēng)靡全球。 然而,經(jīng)過(guò)20多年的發(fā)展,OA期刊的某些弊端也逐步顯現(xiàn)。一些未經(jīng)同行評(píng)審和編輯加工的OA期刊大行其道,極大地影響了數(shù)字學(xué)術(shù)期刊的質(zhì)量與聲譽(yù)。許多研究者對(duì)此現(xiàn)象表示出擔(dān)憂。因此,關(guān)于OA期刊的研究也由最初的“是什么”、“做不做”和“怎么做”等方面的研究逐步向“怎么做好”的方向發(fā)展。 但是,傳統(tǒng)出版方式下建立起來(lái)的期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制理念和方式無(wú)法適應(yīng)數(shù)字學(xué)術(shù)出版發(fā)展的需要。在這種背景下,科技界、出版界和圖書情報(bào)學(xué)界做了許多相關(guān)的嘗試和探索。目前,OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制的研究已成為圖書情報(bào)學(xué)領(lǐng)域的前沿和熱點(diǎn)課題。 為了對(duì)OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制加以深入剖析,本文先從當(dāng)前OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量現(xiàn)狀評(píng)價(jià)入手,借助美國(guó)ISI出版的“期刊引證報(bào)告(JCR)”的總被引頻次、影響因子和即年指數(shù)三大指標(biāo)對(duì)當(dāng)前國(guó)際上主要的OA期刊的學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量進(jìn)行全面客觀的分析評(píng)價(jià),從整體上對(duì)當(dāng)前全球范圍內(nèi)主流開(kāi)放存取期刊的學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量有一個(gè)定量判斷和把握。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文進(jìn)一步探尋影響OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的因素及其作用機(jī)制,分別從OA期刊的出版流程、質(zhì)量影響因素兩個(gè)維度深入解析如何實(shí)現(xiàn)OA期刊質(zhì)量控制。同時(shí),選擇了JCR中引證報(bào)告數(shù)據(jù)完整的108種生物醫(yī)學(xué)類OA期刊作為樣本,分別對(duì)這些期刊的出版流程、出版各要素等方面信息進(jìn)行了統(tǒng)計(jì),利用統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件將其中統(tǒng)計(jì)與數(shù)據(jù)與期刊影響因子進(jìn)行了相關(guān)性分析,力求從結(jié)果中尋找出與OA期刊密切相關(guān)因素,對(duì)研究起到輔助的作用。本文三大主體部分的內(nèi)容主要包括： ①OA期刊質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)研究 瑞典隆德(Lund)大學(xué)圖書館和學(xué)術(shù)出版與學(xué)術(shù)資源聯(lián)盟(The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, SPARC)聯(lián)合創(chuàng)建的開(kāi)放存取期刊目錄(Directory of Open Access Journals, DOAJ)和印度Informatics (India) Ltd公司創(chuàng)建的開(kāi)放存取期刊門戶(Open J-Gate)是當(dāng)前世界上影響力最大,收錄品種最全的兩大OA期刊資源平臺(tái)。在對(duì)兩個(gè)平臺(tái)收錄的OA期刊進(jìn)行對(duì)比篩選后,我們對(duì)目前OA期刊規(guī)模有了初步了解,其數(shù)量達(dá)到7736種。通過(guò)調(diào)查國(guó)際知名的Web of Science數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)收錄的OA期刊情況,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)Web of Science數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)期刊中OA期刊比例達(dá)到8.9%,是2004年的3.4倍,由此我們認(rèn)為,高質(zhì)量的OA期刊已經(jīng)初具規(guī)模。在將JCR中收錄的OA期刊和非OA期刊的三大指標(biāo)進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),整體上而言,OA期刊的總被引頻次低于非OA期刊；OA期刊影響因子略低于非OA期刊,但個(gè)別OA期刊具有極高影響力,超過(guò)了所有非OA期刊；OA期刊的即年指數(shù)表現(xiàn)較好,幾乎與非OA期刊不相上下。 ②OA期刊出版流程和審稿制度對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量影響研究 稿件的編輯、評(píng)審過(guò)程長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)都被視為影響期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的決定性因素。但我們經(jīng)過(guò)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),對(duì)于OA期刊而言,前編輯階段和發(fā)布環(huán)節(jié)同樣能對(duì)OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量產(chǎn)生重要的影響。前編輯環(huán)節(jié)中的組稿和宣傳工作,特別是利用搜索引擎優(yōu)化、增加外部鏈接數(shù)量、電子郵件列表等網(wǎng)絡(luò)營(yíng)銷手段進(jìn)行的OA期刊宣傳工作,都能有效提高OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量。網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播方式促進(jìn)了OA期刊評(píng)審環(huán)節(jié)向發(fā)布環(huán)節(jié)的延伸,除了傳統(tǒng)的“先評(píng)審,后出版”的評(píng)審方式外,還可以采取“先出版,后評(píng)審”或者“先(同行)評(píng)審,后出版,再(讀者)評(píng)審”的評(píng)審方式。因此,OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制應(yīng)該在原有的基礎(chǔ)上向兩頭延伸。此外,OA期刊可以采用靈活的出版周期,縮短出版時(shí)滯,成熟一篇,發(fā)表一篇。 傳統(tǒng)的評(píng)審制度被證明依然是保障OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的基本要素,因此應(yīng)該被保留,但需要在原有的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)“同行評(píng)審制度”、“三級(jí)審查制度”進(jìn)行監(jiān)督和控制。 ③OA期刊出版要素對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的影響研究 OA期刊的學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制除了體現(xiàn)在出版流程控制之外,還體現(xiàn)在要素控制。OA期刊出版要素可分為稿件、作者、編輯、評(píng)審人、讀者、技術(shù)六大部分。稿件要素的質(zhì)量控制體現(xiàn)在堅(jiān)持創(chuàng)新性、可靠性和學(xué)術(shù)性的原則基礎(chǔ)上制定科學(xué)的稿件的評(píng)審標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。作者要素的質(zhì)量控制需要根據(jù)作者在學(xué)術(shù)交流的特點(diǎn)和作用,發(fā)揮現(xiàn)有作者的作用,從研究者多角色的角度創(chuàng)建高素質(zhì)作者隊(duì)伍。OA期刊出版形式編輯依然是期刊質(zhì)量的“守門人”,網(wǎng)絡(luò)出版模式對(duì)編輯隊(duì)伍提出了新的有別與傳統(tǒng)期刊出版模式下的執(zhí)業(yè)要求,OA期刊編輯要素控制主要通過(guò)在原有基礎(chǔ)上加入電腦能力、信息處理能力、溝通能力、學(xué)術(shù)能力、外語(yǔ)能力等編輯素質(zhì)考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。評(píng)審人肩負(fù)著評(píng)價(jià)稿件學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量的重任,提高評(píng)審人的學(xué)術(shù)水平、規(guī)模、編輯能力都是提高稿件評(píng)審質(zhì)量的有效渠道。讀者要素是OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量要素控制中最活躍的部分,也是OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制與傳統(tǒng)期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制差異最大的部分。OA期刊讀者可以通過(guò)點(diǎn)擊、下載、轉(zhuǎn)載、評(píng)論、內(nèi)容補(bǔ)充等信息反饋方式參與OA期刊出版、評(píng)價(jià),由傳統(tǒng)出版模式下被動(dòng)的信息接受者轉(zhuǎn)而成為了信息的主動(dòng)發(fā)布者。其中,核心讀者影響因素最為明顯。但這種反饋信息是零碎的、無(wú)序的,可能包含許多無(wú)效信息,因此OA期刊讀者要素控制就是樹立核心讀者概念,擴(kuò)大核心讀者規(guī)模,提高讀者反饋信息質(zhì)量。OA期刊出版的每一個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)都離不開(kāi)技術(shù)的支持,先進(jìn)的技術(shù)不僅能幫助OA期刊順利地出版,還能幫助OA期刊從提高內(nèi)容質(zhì)量、提高評(píng)審質(zhì)量、提高傳播質(zhì)量和縮短出版時(shí)滯四個(gè)方面實(shí)行學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制。因此,OA期刊在后續(xù)的發(fā)展中,還要繼續(xù)重視新興技術(shù)的開(kāi)發(fā)和應(yīng)用,進(jìn)一步借助技術(shù)手段實(shí)現(xiàn)學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制。 綜上所述,我們認(rèn)為提高OA期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量水平,實(shí)現(xiàn)OA期刊質(zhì)量控制,應(yīng)該主要從流程管理和要素管理兩大方面入手,建立全面、立體的學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量控制機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:At the end of the twentieth Century, the development of digital publishing, the open and shared publishing concept, the simplified publishing process, the self-help publishing way and the fast publishing cycle made the open access (OA) periodicals popular all over the world.
However, after more than 20 years of development, some of the disadvantages of OA periodicals have gradually emerged. Some OA periodicals without peer review and editing have greatly influenced the quality and reputation of digital academic journals. Many researchers are worried about this phenomenon. Therefore, the research on OA periodicals is also the first "what", "do" The research on "not doing" and "how to do" has gradually developed towards "how to do well".
However, the concept and mode of periodical academic quality control established under the traditional publishing method can not meet the needs of the development of digital academic publishing. Under this background, the scientific and technological circles, the publishing circles and the library and information science circles have done a lot of related attempts and explorations. At present, the Research on the academic quality control of OA periodicals has become the field of Library and information science. Frontiers and hot topics.
In order to make a thorough analysis of the academic quality control of OA periodicals, this paper begins with the current evaluation of the current academic quality of OA periodicals, with the help of the total cited frequency of the "Journal Citation Report (JCR)" published by American ISI, the three major indexes of the impact factor and the year index, to make a comprehensive and objective analysis of the academic quality of the current international main OA periodicals. On the basis of this, this paper further explores the factors affecting the academic quality of OA periodicals and its mechanism of action, and analyzes how to realize the OA periodicals from the two dimensions of the publishing process of OA periodicals and the factors affecting the quality of the periodicals, respectively. At the same time, 108 kinds of biomedical OA periodicals with complete data of JCR citation report are selected as samples, and the publishing process and publishing elements of these periodicals are statistically analyzed. Statistical software is used to analyze the correlation between statistics and data and periodical influence factors in order to seek the results from the results. The factors that are closely related to OA journals play an auxiliary role in the study. The contents of the three main parts of this paper include:
Study on the quality evaluation of OA Periodicals
Open access journal catalogues (Directory of Open) and open access journal portal created by the The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, SPARC, Sweden, Longde (Lund) University Library and Academic Resources Association (The and Academic Resources Coalition, SPARC). It is the most influential and most comprehensive resource platform of the two OA journals in the world. After comparing and screening the OA periodicals included in the two platforms, we have a preliminary understanding of the scale of the current OA periodicals, and the number reached 7736. We found Web through the investigation of the status of the OA periodicals included in the internationally famous Web of Science database. The proportion of OA periodicals in the of Science database is 8.9%, 3.4 times that of 2004. Therefore, we think that high quality OA periodicals have begun to take shape. In comparison and analysis of the three major indexes of OA journals and non OA periodicals included in JCR, we find that the overall citation frequency of OA issue is lower than that of non OA periodicals, and the influence of OA periodicals on the whole. The factors are slightly lower than non OA periodicals, but individual OA periodicals have high influence, exceeding all non OA periodicals; the annual index of OA periodicals is better, almost the same as non OA periodicals.
Research on the impact of OA journal publishing process and peer review system on academic quality
The editing process of manuscripts has long been regarded as a decisive factor affecting the academic quality of periodicals. However, we have found that, for OA periodicals, the pre editing and publishing links can also have an important impact on the academic quality of OA journals. Optimization, increasing the number of external links, e-mailing list and other network marketing means such as OA periodicals can effectively improve the academic quality of OA periodicals. The network communication mode promotes the extension of the review link of OA periodicals. In addition to the traditional evaluation method of "first review and post publication", the "first publication" can be adopted. "Post review" or "first (peer) review, post publication, and then (Reader) review" evaluation method. Therefore, the academic quality control of OA periodicals should be extended on the original basis. In addition, OA periodicals can adopt a flexible publishing cycle, shorten the time delay in publishing, mature one and publish one.
The traditional evaluation system has been proved to be the basic element to guarantee the academic quality of OA periodicals. Therefore, it should be retained, but it needs to be supervised and controlled on the basis of the "peer review system" and "three level review system" on the basis of the original.
Research on the impact of OA periodical publishing elements on academic quality
The academic quality control of OA periodicals is not only reflected in the control of the publishing process, but also reflected in the elements control of the elements of.OA periodicals, which can be divided into six parts: manuscripts, authors, editors, judges, readers and technology. The quality control of manuscript elements is embodied in the formulation of scientific manuscripts on the basis of adhering to the principles of innovation, reliability and academic nature. The quality control of the author's elements needs to play the role of the author in accordance with the characteristics and functions of the author in the academic exchange. To create a team of high quality authors from the perspective of the researchers' multiple roles, the editing of the publication form of.OA periodicals is still a "gatekeeper" for the quality of the periodicals, and the network publishing model has put forward a new difference to the editorial team. In the traditional periodical publishing mode, the requirement of the practice is to control the editor quality of OA journal editing mainly by adding computer ability, information processing ability, communication ability, academic ability, foreign language ability and so on. The judges shoulder the responsibility of evaluating the academic quality of manuscripts, and improve the academic level, scale and editing of the judges. Ability is an effective way to improve the quality of manuscript evaluation. The reader element is the most active part of the OA journal's academic quality control. It is also the part of the OA journal academic quality control and the traditional periodical academic quality control. The.OA periodical readers can use the information feedback methods such as click, download, reprint, comment, content supplement and so on. With the publication and evaluation of OA periodicals, the passive information recipients of the traditional publishing model have turned to become active publishers of information. Among them, the core readers have the most obvious influence factors. However, the feedback information is fragmentary, disordered, and may contain many invalid information. Therefore, the reader element control of the OA issue is to establish the core reader concept, expanding the concept of the core reader. The scale of the large core readers and the quality of readers' feedback information.OA can not be supported by the technical support. Advanced technology can not only help OA periodicals publish smoothly, but also help OA periodicals carry out academic quality from four aspects: improving the quality of content, improving the quality of evaluation, improving the quality of communication and shortening the time lag of publishing. Therefore, in the follow-up development of OA journals, we should continue to attach importance to the development and application of new technologies, and further achieve the academic quality control by means of technology.
To sum up, we think that improving the academic quality level of OA periodicals and realizing the quality control of OA periodicals should be mainly from two aspects of process management and factor management, and establish a comprehensive and stereoscopic academic quality control mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：G237.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉雪立,喬漢臣,劉國(guó)偉,潘伯榮;雙匿名審稿及其在編輯實(shí)踐中的應(yīng)用[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);1994年01期

2 錢壽初;審稿是否可以公開(kāi)了?[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

3 司有和,黃竹英;加入世界貿(mào)易組織后中國(guó)科技期刊的形勢(shì)與對(duì)策[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 許文深,姚遠(yuǎn);科技期刊審稿的發(fā)展[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

5 倪向陽(yáng),馬永軍;參考文獻(xiàn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接及其對(duì)中國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)期刊的影響[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

6 陳莊,夏登武,劉慶穎;論編輯對(duì)科技期刊論文的質(zhì)量控制[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 任丹青,鄭芹珠,肖宏;面向國(guó)際的審稿人隊(duì)伍建設(shè)[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

8 張九慶;;科技學(xué)術(shù)期刊的質(zhì)量控制[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

9 宮福滿;;科技期刊論文審稿人署名弊大于利[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

10 周慶輝;陳紅云;張晶;殷惠霞;凌昌全;;DOI與CrossRef在科技期刊出版中的作用[J];編輯學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王英華;李江濤;;期刊發(fā)表時(shí)滯研究[A];第四屆全國(guó)核心期刊與期刊國(guó)際化、網(wǎng)絡(luò)化研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉海寧;[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 喬冬梅;e印本文庫(kù)建設(shè)與應(yīng)用[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2103977