本文選題：一稿多投 + 審稿　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 《中華人民共和國著作權法》(以下簡稱《著作權法》和《中華人民共和國著作權法實施條例》自頒布修訂實施以來,至今已有近十年的時間了。它為保障智力成果和鼓勵智力創(chuàng)作起到了積極作用。然而,近些年來學術界日益泛濫的“一稿多投”現(xiàn)象卻屢禁不止,并且在出版社、作者和讀者三方群體中產生了強烈爭議,不由使我們對《著作權法》關于一稿多投問題的規(guī)定產生了一些思考�！耙桓宥嗤丁辈粌H關系到出版社的利益,同時也關系到作者合法利益的保護和最大化。在知識經濟和信息爆炸的時代,對此問題予以深入研究,對于完善現(xiàn)有立法和規(guī)范學術行為具有重要意義。 本文以《著作權法》和《合同法》為視角,選取典型案例,通過對案例的分析提出“一稿多投”現(xiàn)象背后所隱含的法律問題,從而對這一現(xiàn)象的成因、法律性質、立法漏洞進行全面剖析,最終為這一問題提出解決對策。 筆者認為要解決“一稿多投”問題,首先必須要對這一行為進行界定和分類,對固有的“一稿多投都是違法”這一觀點進行澄清,才.能客觀合理地解決該問題。在傳統(tǒng)的《著作權法》角度分析“一稿多投”的基礎之上,通過運用《合同法》原理,對“稿約”、“投稿行為”、“刊用作品”等行為進行法律性質界定,將作者和出版社雙方的權利和義務明確化,有利于合理歸責,從而使問題的解決合法合理。同時,《著作權法》第32條和《著作權法實施條例》第23條存在的立法漏洞造成了著作權的空洞化,更加強化了作者的弱勢地位。因此,對于該問題的解決必須從法律、出版社和學術道德建設三個方面著手,將事前預防和事后懲罰相結合。應當完善現(xiàn)有法律,采用合同方式避免“一稿多投”,使作者和出版社雙方的權利義務得到法定平衡；出版社在提高工作效率、加強與作者溝通的同時應當與作者簽訂書面合同。在此,出版社尤其應當參考借鑒國外優(yōu)秀期刊的審稿制度,從而簡化審稿程序和確保審稿的公正性。改革我國現(xiàn)有的學術評價體系,成立學術監(jiān)督機構,通過加快學術誠信建設可以為這一問題的解決提供內在動力。
[Abstract]:The copyright Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the copyright Law) and the regulations for the implementation of the copyright Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the copyright Law") have been in force for nearly ten years since they were promulgated and revised. It plays a positive role in safeguarding intellectual achievements and encouraging intellectual creation. However, in recent years, the phenomenon of "more than one draft", which has become increasingly widespread in academic circles, has been repeatedly prohibited, and has generated strong controversy among the three groups of publishers, authors and readers. It makes us think about the regulation of "copyright Law". "one draft and more input" concerns not only the interests of the publishing house, but also the protection and maximization of the author's legitimate interests. In the era of knowledge economy and information explosion, it is of great significance to make a thorough study of this problem for perfecting the existing legislation and standardizing academic behavior. This paper, from the perspective of copyright Law and contract Law, selects typical cases and puts forward the legal problems behind the phenomenon of "one draft with more input" through the analysis of the case, so as to analyze the causes and the legal nature of this phenomenon. The legislative loophole carries on the comprehensive analysis, finally proposes the solution countermeasure for this question. The author thinks that in order to solve the problem of "one draft and more input", we must define and classify this behavior first, and clarify the inherent view that "one draft and more input is illegal". The problem can be solved objectively and reasonably. Based on the analysis of "one draft with more input" in the traditional copyright Law, this paper defines the legal nature of "manuscript agreement", "contribution act", "publication work" and so on by applying the principle of "contract Law". Making clear the rights and obligations of the author and the publishing house is beneficial to the reasonable imputation, so that the solution of the problem is legal and reasonable. At the same time, the legislative loopholes in Article 32 of the copyright Law and Article 23 of the implementation regulations of the copyright Law have resulted in the hollowing out of the copyright and strengthened the weak position of the author. Therefore, to solve this problem, we must start from the three aspects of law, publishing house and academic moral construction, and combine prevention and punishment after the event. The existing laws should be perfected and the contract method should be adopted to avoid "one draft with more input", so that the rights and obligations of both authors and publishers can be legally balanced, and publishers are improving their working efficiency. Strengthen communication with the author should be accompanied by a written contract with the author. In this paper, the publishing house should refer to the system of reviewing manuscripts of foreign excellent periodicals, so as to simplify the procedure of reviewing manuscripts and ensure the fairness of reviewing manuscripts. The reform of the existing academic evaluation system and the establishment of academic supervision institutions can provide an internal motive force for the solution of this problem by speeding up the construction of academic integrity.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 唐彩霞;;“一稿多投”、“一稿多用”與稿件的著作權保護[J];圖書與情報;2006年02期

2 金鐵成;科技期刊稿約應包含的著作權條款[J];編輯學報;2003年02期

3 劉福民;"一稿多投"——報刊維權應從為作者維權入手[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2005年02期

4 黃玉燁,羅施福;論我國著作權轉讓登記公示制度的構建——從著作權的“一女多嫁”談起[J];法律科學-西北政法學院學報;2005年05期

5 陳禮旺;著作權的空洞化與一稿多投、一稿多用的解禁[J];長江大學學報(社會科學版);2005年03期

6 涂衛(wèi),李少鵬;"一稿多投"的著作權法分析[J];內蒙古師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年S2期

7 王立欣;;科技期刊出版中“一稿多投”問題的理性思考[J];沈陽農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2007年01期

8 葉繼紅;;試論高校研究生“一稿多投”現(xiàn)象的成因和對策[J];學位與研究生教育;2006年03期

，

本文編號：2062491