本文選題：生物醫(yī)學(xué) + 學(xué)術(shù)圖書　； 參考：《中國人民解放軍軍事醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,我國的出版事業(yè)空前繁榮,圖書出版品種和數(shù)量逐年增加,版權(quán)貿(mào)易活躍,從每年圖書出版品種、數(shù)量等方面看,我國已步入世界出版大國的行列。學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版是出版產(chǎn)業(yè)的重要組成部分,生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版是學(xué)術(shù)出版最活躍的領(lǐng)域之一。但是,在我國出版的生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書中,影印、翻譯、編譯等出版形式占了較大比重,原創(chuàng)性的學(xué)術(shù)圖書很少,尤其缺乏經(jīng)典的學(xué)術(shù)著作。歐美等發(fā)達(dá)國家所出版的英文生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書占據(jù)了世界生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版的主流,代表了當(dāng)前國際生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版的趨勢和方向。本研究通過對歐美發(fā)達(dá)國家出版的英文生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書的分析,探求生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書的出版規(guī)律;并通過中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版比較研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國與發(fā)達(dá)國家的差距,進(jìn)一步尋找縮小差距的對策,對提高我國生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版水平具有重要意義。 本研究首先采用計(jì)量研究、案例研究、專家咨詢等方法,針對生物醫(yī)學(xué)發(fā)展與學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版之間的關(guān)系,對生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版規(guī)律進(jìn)行了研究;其次,通過對中外圍繞同一主題出版的生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書進(jìn)行了比較研究,以發(fā)現(xiàn)中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版的差距;最后,基于以上研究得出的出版規(guī)律對生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書選題策劃進(jìn)行了預(yù)測研究,基于中外比較結(jié)果針對縮小中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版差距、提升我國生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版國際競爭力提出了對策和建議。 本論文共分四個部分: 第一部分是生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版規(guī)律探討。首先,在對生物醫(yī)學(xué)發(fā)展歷程做了大量文獻(xiàn)調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,選取3個重大事件作為研究對象:“重組DNA”或“分子克隆”技術(shù)發(fā)明與應(yīng)用、“聚合酶鏈?zhǔn)椒磻?yīng)”技術(shù)發(fā)明與應(yīng)用、“基因組”研究與應(yīng)用。其次,采用案例研究方法,分別通過對圍繞以上3個重大事件的論文發(fā)表數(shù)量與相關(guān)英文學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版品種關(guān)系的文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)分析、圖書出版時間及出版形式分析、圖書主題分化分析、圖書出版機(jī)構(gòu)分析,得到以下生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版規(guī)律:學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版品種的高峰一般在論文發(fā)表數(shù)量高峰后的2~5年出現(xiàn);首部學(xué)術(shù)圖書通常出現(xiàn)在知識源出現(xiàn)后的1~4年,出版形式以論文集為主;經(jīng)典專著出版的時間一般是在知識源出現(xiàn)后10年左右;實(shí)驗(yàn)技術(shù)類圖書出版具有周期性,目前周期為3年左右;技術(shù)手冊是生物醫(yī)學(xué)圖書出版的永恒主題,隨著研究進(jìn)展出版主題越來細(xì)化;在生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版領(lǐng)域,商業(yè)性出版社仍占有重要地位,學(xué)術(shù)出版社也可以依托母體優(yōu)勢形成出版特色。 第二部分是中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版比較研究。采用比較研究方法,對中外以“重組DNA”或“分子克隆”、“聚合酶鏈?zhǔn)椒磻?yīng)”、“基因組”為主題的學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版品種、首部學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版時間、圖書出版方式、圖書出版機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了比較研究,得出以下結(jié)論:中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版在品種上存在巨大差距;中國首部同樣主題的生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書比國外首部圖書出版時間要晚;國外出版的生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書以原創(chuàng)性著作為主,中國出版的生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書中影印、翻譯或編譯等出版方式占了較大比重,原創(chuàng)性著作較少;在生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版領(lǐng)域,國外學(xué)術(shù)出版社和商業(yè)出版社各有特色,中國出版企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略不明確,選題策劃能力較低。為了探求以上差距的深層次原因,根據(jù)邁克爾·波特提出的產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競爭力“鉆石模型”,從出版資源要素、出版產(chǎn)業(yè)政策要素、出版企業(yè)經(jīng)營戰(zhàn)略和組織要素、出版技術(shù)要素四個方面對中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版國際競爭力進(jìn)行了比較研究,并得出結(jié)論:與發(fā)達(dá)國家相比,我國生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版國際競爭力較低。 第三部分是對策研究。首先,基于第一部分研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的出版規(guī)律,通過對2006 2010年美國《科學(xué)》雜志年度“十大”科學(xué)突破和《時代》雜志年度“十大”醫(yī)學(xué)突破中有關(guān)生物醫(yī)學(xué)內(nèi)容的分析,預(yù)測了當(dāng)前及今后一段時期內(nèi)生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書的重點(diǎn)選題領(lǐng)域:①基因測序與基因治療;②蛋白質(zhì)組研究;③干細(xì)胞研究;④細(xì)胞重新編程技術(shù);⑤合成生物學(xué)。其次,基于第二部分發(fā)現(xiàn)的中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版差距,為縮小中外差距,提出了發(fā)展我國生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版的對策:加大出版力度,增加出版品種;搶占優(yōu)勢資源,提高原創(chuàng)水平;發(fā)展版權(quán)貿(mào)易,引進(jìn)優(yōu)秀圖書;依托自身優(yōu)勢,形成出版特色。最后,基于中外生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書國際競爭力的差距,提出了提升我國生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版國際競爭力的策略:國家要加大生物醫(yī)學(xué)科研投入;對生物醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版給予優(yōu)惠的稅收和財(cái)政補(bǔ)貼政策;鼓勵組建以專業(yè)化為特色的出版集團(tuán);出版企業(yè)要制定國際化戰(zhàn)略;大力發(fā)展數(shù)字出版技術(shù)。 第四部分是主要研究結(jié)論與討論。簡要概括了本論文的主要研究結(jié)論,并提出了研究中存在的不足和以后需要進(jìn)一步研究的問題。
[Abstract]:At present, the publishing industry of our country is unprecedentedly prosperous, the variety and quantity of book publishing are increasing year by year, the copyright trade is active. From the aspects of the variety and quantity of books and publications every year, our country has entered the ranks of the world's publishing country. Academic books publishing is an important component of the publishing industry, and the publication of biomedical academic books is the most active academic publication. However, in the biomedical academic books published in China, the publishing forms, such as photocopying, translation and compilation, have accounted for a large proportion. There are few original academic books, especially the lack of classical academic books. English biomedical books published by developed countries such as Europe and America occupy the world biomedical academic books published. The mainstream represents the trend and direction of the current international biomedical academic books publishing. This study seeks to explore the publishing laws of biomedical academic books through the analysis of English biomedical academic books published in developed countries in Europe and the United States, and to find the difference between China and the developed countries through comparative research on the publication of biomedical academic books in China and foreign countries. It is of great significance to further explore the countermeasures to narrow the gap in order to improve the publication level of biomedical academic books in China.
First of all, this research adopts the methods of measurement, case study, and expert consultation. In view of the relationship between the biomedicine development and the academic book publishing, this paper studies the law of the publishing of biomedical academic books. Secondly, through the comparative study of the biologic medical books published around the same topic in China and foreign countries, the Chinese and foreign students are found to be found. In the end, based on the law of publication above, this paper makes a prediction and Research on the topic planning of biomedical academic books. Based on the comparison between China and foreign countries, some countermeasures are put forward to reduce the gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books and promote the international competitiveness of biomedical academic books in China. Suggestion.
This paper is divided into four parts:
First, on the basis of a large number of literature research on the history of biomedicine, 3 major events are selected as the research object: "recombinant DNA" or "molecular cloning" technology invention and application, "polymerase chain reaction" technology invention and application, "genome" research. Secondly, using the case study method, the bibliometric analysis of the relationship between the number of papers published around the 3 major events and the related English academic books, the analysis of book publishing time and the form of publication, the analysis of book theme differentiation, the analysis of book publishing institutions, and the following biomedical academics The law of book publishing: the peak of the variety of academic books is generally appeared in 2~5 years after the peak of the publication of the paper. The first academic books usually appear in the 1~4 years after the emergence of the source of knowledge, and the form of the publication is mainly on the anthology; the time of the publication of the classic monograph is generally about 10 years after the source of knowledge; the book of experimental technology books is published. Periodicity, the current cycle is about 3 years, the technical manual is the eternal theme of biomedical books publishing. With the progress of research, the publishing theme is becoming more and more detailed. In the field of biomedical academic books, commercial publishing houses still occupy an important position, and academic press can also form the publishing characteristics according to the advantages of the parent body.
The second part is the comparative study of biomedical academic books and publications in China and foreign countries. By means of comparative study, the publication of "recombinant DNA" or "molecular cloning", "polymerase chain reaction", "genome" as the subject of academic books, the time of publication of the first academic books, the way of book publishing, and the publishing institution of books have been carried out. The following conclusions are drawn: there is a huge gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books published in Chinese and foreign academic books; the first biomedical academic books with the same theme in China are later than the first books published in foreign countries; the biomedical academic books published abroad are the principal and the Chinese published biomedical academic books are photocopied. In the field of biomedical academic books publishing, foreign academic publishing houses and commercial publishing houses have their own characteristics. The strategy of Chinese publishing enterprises is not clear, and the planning ability of the selected topics is low. In order to explore the deep reasons of the above gap, according to Michael Porter The "Diamond Model" of industrial international competitiveness is a comparative study of the international competitiveness of Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books publishing from four aspects of publishing resource elements, publishing industry policy elements, publishing enterprise management strategy and organizational elements, and publishing technical elements, and draws a conclusion: compared with developed countries, China's biomedical academic map is compared. Book publishing has a low international competitiveness.
The third part is the countermeasure research. First, based on the publication rule of the first part of the study, the biomedical academic books in the previous and future period are predicted through the analysis of the 20062010 year "ten big" scientific breakthroughs of the American Journal of science and the "ten big" medical breakthroughs of the times magazine. The key topics are: (1) gene sequencing and gene therapy; (2) protein group research; (3) stem cell research; (4) cell reprogramming technology; (5) synthesis biology. Secondly, the gap between Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books published on the basis of the second part is found to reduce the gap between China and foreign countries, and puts forward the development of biomedical academic books in China. Policy: increase the intensity of publishing, increase the variety of publishing, seize the dominant resources, improve the original level, develop the copyright trade, introduce excellent books, and rely on their own advantages to form the publishing characteristics. Finally, based on the gap of international competitiveness of Chinese and foreign biomedical academic books, the strategy of promoting the international competitiveness of biomedical academic books in China is put forward. The state should increase the input of biomedical scientific research; give preferential tax and financial subsidy policies to the publishing of biomedical academic books; encourage the formation of a publishing group characterized by specialization; the publishing enterprise should formulate an international strategy and vigorously develop the digital publishing technology.
The fourth part is the main research conclusion and discussion. It briefly summarizes the main conclusions of this paper, and puts forward the shortcomings in the study and the problems that need further study in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國人民解放軍軍事醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：R-5;G232

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙明節(jié);學(xué)術(shù)圖書路在何方?[J];編輯學(xué)刊;2002年02期

2 李瑞華;;學(xué)術(shù)出版的春天還有多遠(yuǎn)——人文學(xué)術(shù)出版的定位與思考[J];編輯學(xué)刊;2006年05期

3 江翠平;;中外科技出版比較分析[J];編輯之友;2007年05期

4 姬建敏;;近兩年來我國編輯學(xué)研究特點(diǎn)簡論[J];編輯之友;2009年12期

5 吳明華;中外出版產(chǎn)業(yè)集中度比較分析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2002年09期

6 方卿;提升我國科技出版的國際競爭力[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2003年01期

7 要力石;;現(xiàn)代圖書出版的六個基本規(guī)律探析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2007年03期

8 方卿;;論科技出版管理體制與運(yùn)行機(jī)制創(chuàng)新——對中外科技出版的四項(xiàng)比較研究[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2008年02期

9 范緒泉;;出版企業(yè)的專業(yè)化競爭戰(zhàn)略[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2011年03期

10 吳江江;;學(xué)術(shù)著作特征與出版政策研究[J];出版廣角;1999年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 馬學(xué)海;[N];光明日報(bào);2002年

2 清華大學(xué)思想文化研究所所長、教授 李伯重;[N];光明日報(bào);2005年

3 中國出版科學(xué)研究所 龐沁文;[N];中國新聞出版報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 張寧;當(dāng)前生物醫(yī)學(xué)發(fā)展前沿對我軍醫(yī)學(xué)科研管理的影響[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2003年

2 胡苗;中美圖書編輯活動比較研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

3 孫玉玲;中國學(xué)術(shù)圖書出版發(fā)展研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

4 莫鵬燕;學(xué)術(shù)著作發(fā)行問題的探討[D];河南大學(xué);2007年

5 肖貴飛;我國學(xué)術(shù)圖書營銷探析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

6 張麗英;中美圖書分類法比較研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2008年

7 顧洋;中外出版企業(yè)數(shù)字化管理比較研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

8 唐曉亮;中日出版發(fā)行體制研究[D];北京印刷學(xué)院;2009年

9 劉琳琳;中美大學(xué)出版社品牌比較研究[D];北京印刷學(xué)院;2009年

，

本文編號：1991339