本文選題：隨機對照試驗 + 摘要��； 參考：《中國科技期刊研究》2017年12期

【摘要】：【目的】評估7種優(yōu)秀中文臨床醫(yī)學(xué)期刊隨機對照臨床試驗(RCT)摘要報告質(zhì)量,為提高我國醫(yī)學(xué)期刊RCT摘要報告質(zhì)量提供依據(jù)�！痉椒ā吭谌f方數(shù)據(jù)庫中檢索7種臨床醫(yī)學(xué)期刊近年來發(fā)表的RCT文獻,根據(jù)《期刊與學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要中報告隨機對照試驗的CONSORT聲明》評估摘要報告質(zhì)量�！窘Y(jié)果】檢索到RCT文獻284篇,摘要條目總體報告率為41.10%~50.00%,平均報告率為46.03%。《中華兒科雜志》《中華內(nèi)科雜志》《中華眼科雜志》2011—2013年稿約中無摘要CONSORT要求,RCT摘要條目報告率平均為45.38%,2014—2016年稿約中有摘要CONSORT要求,摘要條目報告率平均為45.11%。摘要條目中,目的和結(jié)論報告率最高,報告率為100%,分配隱藏方法、試驗注冊、標(biāo)題、試驗設(shè)計等條目報告率較低�！窘Y(jié)論】我國醫(yī)學(xué)期刊RCT摘要報告質(zhì)量有待提高,尤其應(yīng)當(dāng)加強針對標(biāo)題、試驗設(shè)計、是否采用盲法、分析例數(shù)、試驗注冊等條目的報告。期刊編輯應(yīng)當(dāng)重視并且主動承擔(dān)RCT摘要規(guī)范化的責(zé)任,保證RCT摘要的質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:[objective] to evaluate the quality of summary reports of seven excellent Chinese clinical medical journals in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). In order to provide the basis for improving the quality of RCT summary reports in Chinese medical journals. [methods] Seven clinical medical journals published in recent years were searched for RCT in Wanfang database. [results] 284 articles of RCT were retrieved according to the CONSORT statements of randomized controlled trials reported in the abstract of papers of journals and academic conferences, and the quality of summary reports was evaluated. The total reporting rate of items was 41.100.The average reporting rate was 46.03.No abstract CONSORT was required in the 2011-2013 draft of < Chinese Journal of Pediatrics > Chinese Journal of Medicine > Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, and the average reporting rate of summary items was 45.38%. The average item reporting rate was 45.11. Among the items, objective and conclusion report rate is the highest, the reporting rate is 100, the distribution of hidden methods, experimental registration, title, experimental design and other items reporting rate is relatively low. [conclusion] the quality of RCT summary report in Chinese medical journals needs to be improved. In particular, we should strengthen the report on the title, experimental design, blind method, analysis of the number of examples, test registration, etc. Periodical editors should take the responsibility of standardization of RCT abstracts and guarantee the quality of RCT abstracts.
【作者單位】： 中國醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院皮膚病研究所北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學(xué)院《中華皮膚科雜志》編輯部;
【基金】：中國科協(xié)精品科技期刊工程項目第四期“期刊學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量提升項目”(2015—2017)
【分類號】：G232
，

本文編號：1946033