本文選題：一般人格權(quán) + 著作人身權(quán)��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為財產(chǎn)法制度中的特例,著作權(quán)法上專門的人身權(quán)制度使得著作權(quán)法區(qū)別于物權(quán)法、債權(quán)法等傳統(tǒng)的民法,而著作人身權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓可能性又模糊了這一界限,其本身仍然表現(xiàn)出一種區(qū)別于傳統(tǒng)精神權(quán)利的特征。本文就是針對這一困惑,針對民法中的人格權(quán)、著作權(quán)法中的人身權(quán),試圖厘清兩者的關(guān)系。同時,針對著作人身權(quán)在著作權(quán)交易市場中可否進行交易的理論困境,提出自己的建議。 本文正文分為七個部分: 第一部分通過對一般人格權(quán)與著作人身權(quán)的對比,著作人身權(quán)與一般人格權(quán)雖然都涉及精神人格利益,但是兩者之間具有明顯的差異,造成這些不同的原因可以歸結(jié)為:著作人身權(quán)是與作品相聯(lián)系的。另外,著作人身權(quán)與著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)有密切的聯(lián)系,有時著作人身權(quán)需要結(jié)合著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)才能實現(xiàn),如發(fā)表權(quán)與復(fù)制權(quán)、發(fā)行權(quán)結(jié)合行使;而一般人身權(quán)與財產(chǎn)權(quán)卻沒有這種關(guān)系。 第二部分將通過對大陸法系、英美法系以及國際公約的一般人格權(quán)與著作人身權(quán)的梳理,明確不同法系針對一般人格權(quán)與著作人身權(quán)的差異,在法理以及立法技術(shù)上的處理。 第三部分針對著作權(quán)法自身的著作人身權(quán)與著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)的關(guān)系,著作人身權(quán)與著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)之間的關(guān)系比一般的物權(quán)中財產(chǎn)權(quán)與人格權(quán)之間的關(guān)系不同。創(chuàng)作行為作為一種特殊的勞動,創(chuàng)作的作品作為作者的勞動成果,應(yīng)當(dāng)歸勞動者所有。同時,作品一旦創(chuàng)作完成,就脫離了作者,與民法中的物沒有什么不同,但是,民法基本理論從來沒有發(fā)展或者試圖創(chuàng)造出物權(quán)人身權(quán)、債權(quán)人身權(quán),本部分這對這一問題,試圖明確為什么物權(quán)法沒有物權(quán)人身權(quán),債法上沒有債權(quán)人身權(quán),而偏偏著作權(quán)法上產(chǎn)生了著作人身權(quán)。 第四部分在版權(quán)市場中討論著作人身權(quán),還是基于人身權(quán)的不可讓與性與財產(chǎn)權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)性之間的矛盾,以及主張版權(quán)法為財產(chǎn)法的學(xué)者的擔(dān)憂,即著作人身權(quán)的存在是否影響了越來越繁榮的版權(quán)市場的交易的進行或合作方式的多元化,面對版權(quán)市場的發(fā)展,著作人身權(quán)制度應(yīng)當(dāng)如何進行積極的反應(yīng)。 第五部分應(yīng)對目前數(shù)字技術(shù)的發(fā)展,數(shù)字環(huán)境對傳統(tǒng)著作人身權(quán)的沖擊,以及在數(shù)字環(huán)境中,探討著作人身權(quán)的放棄與保護。 第六部分以及第七部分通過前述部分的總結(jié)與分析,試圖提出關(guān)于我國著作人身權(quán)制度的思考以及未來著作權(quán)發(fā)展的可能路徑。
[Abstract]:As a special case in the property law system, the special personal right system in the copyright law distinguishes the copyright law from the traditional civil law, such as the property law, the creditor's rights law, and so on. It itself still shows a characteristic which is different from the traditional spiritual right. In view of this confusion, this paper tries to clarify the relationship between the two rights in view of personality rights in civil law and personal rights in copyright law. At the same time, in view of the theoretical dilemma of whether the personal right of the author can be traded in the copyright trading market, the author puts forward his own suggestions. The text of this paper is divided into seven parts: In the first part, through the comparison between the general personality right and the author's personal right, the author's personal right and the general personality right are both related to the interests of spiritual personality, but there are obvious differences between them. The reasons for these differences can be summed up as: the author's personal right is related to the work. In addition, the personal right of a work is closely related to the property right of a work, sometimes the personal right of a work can be realized by combining the property right of a work, such as the right of publication and the right of reproduction, and the right of circulation, but the general right of person and the right of property have no such relationship. In the second part, by combing the general personality right and the author's personal right of the civil law system, the common law system and the international convention, it is clear that the different legal systems deal with the difference between the general personality right and the author's personal right in the legal theory and the legislative technique. The third part aims at the relationship between personal right and property right in copyright law. The relationship between personal right and property right is different from that between property right and personality right in real right. As a special kind of labor, the creation behavior should be owned by the laborer as the result of the author's labor. At the same time, once the work has been created, it is divorced from the author, which is no different from the thing in the civil law. However, the basic theory of civil law has never developed or attempted to create the personal right of the real right, the personal right of the creditor, this part of this question, This paper tries to find out why there is no personal right in real right law, and no personal right of creditor in debt law, but in copyright law there is personal right in works. In the fourth part, the author discusses the contradiction between the personal right of the author or the non-transferability of the personal right and the transference of the property right in the copyright market, as well as the concern of the scholars who claim that the copyright law is the property law. That is, whether the existence of the personal right of the author has affected the transaction of the more and more prosperous copyright market or the diversification of the cooperation mode. In the face of the development of the copyright market, the author's personal right system should react positively. The fifth part deals with the development of digital technology, the impact of digital environment on the personal rights of the traditional works, and discusses the abandonment and protection of the personal rights of the works in the digital environment. The sixth part and the seventh part, through the summary and analysis of the foregoing part, try to put forward the thinking about the system of personal right of the author in our country and the possible path of the development of copyright in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁煌;侯瀚宇;;版權(quán)價值評估對象及其價值影響因素探討[J];中國資產(chǎn)評估;2011年08期

2 潘佳潯;;我國著作權(quán)侵權(quán)精神損害賠償必要性研究[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2011年13期

3 劉志芳;齊峰;;知識共享許可協(xié)議在高校機構(gòu)知識庫著作權(quán)管理中的應(yīng)用研究[J];圖書館學(xué)研究;2011年18期

4 劉璐;;利益平衡—著作權(quán)法之精髓[J];湘潮(下半月);2011年05期

5 凌瀟;云虹;;罪與罰——私權(quán)視角下的侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪問題拓補[J];法制與社會;2011年22期

6 熊琦;;著作權(quán)法定許可的正當(dāng)性解構(gòu)與制度替代[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年06期

7 覃炳文;;征集廣告語的著作權(quán)保護——以“天高幾許問真龍”案為例[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2011年18期

8 祝建軍;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的判斷[J];中國版權(quán);2010年01期

9 王遷;;《版權(quán)法中私人復(fù)制問題研究——從印刷機到互聯(lián)網(wǎng)》評介[J];中國版權(quán);2010年02期

10 馮曉青;付繼存;;著作權(quán)法中的復(fù)制權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)家;2011年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前6條

1 張雪雁;;論委托作品著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)法定歸屬的社會效益——評《著作權(quán)法》第17條[A];2007年全國法經(jīng)濟學(xué)論壇論文集[C];2007年

2 任全明;;平面設(shè)計的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護[A];首屆中國高校美術(shù)與設(shè)計論壇論文集（下）[C];2010年

3 ;《明史研究論叢》稿約[A];明史研究論叢（第九輯）[C];2011年

4 連毅;;淺議網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)的保護[A];第三屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年

5 丁鵬;;論我國民族民間文化的法律保護——以蒙古族服飾藝術(shù)為例[A];民族法學(xué)評論（第七卷）[C];2010年

6 吳春岐;;效率視野中的委托作品著作權(quán)歸屬分析——兼評《著作權(quán)法》第十七條[A];《制度經(jīng)濟學(xué)研究》第二輯[C];2003年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 本報記者 陳原;剽竊？還是“被署名”？[N];人民日報;2010年

2 畢榮建邋李浩;著作人身權(quán)權(quán)利定性引發(fā)的思考[N];人民法院報;2008年

3 本報記者 黃星航 費文彬 本報通訊員 關(guān)秀獻;廣西“真龍”之爭[N];人民法院報;2005年

4 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院 畢榮建;應(yīng)承認法人享有著作人身權(quán)[N];檢察日報;2009年

5 周 s，

本文編號：1885944