本文選題：著作權(quán) + 行政保護(hù)　； 參考：《江西師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展以及科學(xué)技術(shù)的提高，我國(guó)著作權(quán)方面的問(wèn)題越來(lái)越多，也越來(lái)越復(fù)雜。我國(guó)不僅通過(guò)司法方式來(lái)保護(hù)著作權(quán)，也通過(guò)行政方式來(lái)保護(hù)著作權(quán)，是一種行政保護(hù)和司法保護(hù)相結(jié)合的“雙軌制”保護(hù)模式，它們之間相互補(bǔ)充、相互配合，但必須遵守司法最終保護(hù)原則。行政保護(hù)具有中國(guó)特色，但是并非我國(guó)獨(dú)有的。著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)是我國(guó)著作權(quán)制度中的重要的組成部分，是我國(guó)對(duì)著作權(quán)進(jìn)行管理的重要手段之一，有助于著作權(quán)制度在我國(guó)構(gòu)建創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家過(guò)程中發(fā)揮作用，所以我國(guó)需要加強(qiáng)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)。 文章以我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)為對(duì)象，采用理論與實(shí)踐相結(jié)以及國(guó)內(nèi)外比較的方法，探討完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)的建議，期望對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)理論和實(shí)踐有參考價(jià)值。 文章第一部分介紹了我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度的基本理論，，分別闡述了著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度的涵義、特征以及地位三個(gè)方面；第二部分論述了著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度存廢之爭(zhēng)及我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)制度繼續(xù)存在的原因；第三部分簡(jiǎn)要分析對(duì)國(guó)外著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示；第四部分著重分析了我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題，分別從立法、執(zhí)法、公民著作權(quán)意識(shí)、地方保護(hù)主義以及行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)之間的銜接五個(gè)方面分析了我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)存在的問(wèn)題；第五部分針對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)存在的問(wèn)題，探討了完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)的建議，這些建議與其存在的問(wèn)題是相對(duì)應(yīng)，同樣是從立法、執(zhí)法、公民著作權(quán)意識(shí)、地方保護(hù)主義以及行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)之間的銜接五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the improvement of science and technology, there are more and more problems of copyright in China. Our country not only protects the copyright through the judicial way, but also protects the copyright through the administrative way. It is a kind of "two-track system" protection mode which combines the administrative protection with the judicial protection. They complement each other and cooperate with each other. But the principle of ultimate judicial protection must be observed. Administrative protection has Chinese characteristics, but it is not unique to our country. The administrative protection of copyright is an important part of the copyright system in our country and one of the important means to manage the copyright in our country. It helps the copyright system to play a role in the process of building an innovative country in our country. Therefore, our country needs to strengthen the administrative protection of copyright. This paper takes the administrative protection of copyright in our country as the object, adopts the combination of theory and practice and the method of comparison at home and abroad, and probes into the suggestion of perfecting the administrative protection of copyright in our country, which is expected to be of reference value to the theory and practice of the administrative protection of copyright in our country. The first part of the article introduces the basic theory of the copyright administrative protection system in China, and expounds the meaning, characteristics and status of the copyright administrative protection system. The second part discusses the dispute of the copyright administrative protection system and the reason why the copyright administrative protection system of our country continues to exist, the third part briefly analyzes the present situation of the foreign copyright administrative protection and its enlightenment to our country. The fourth part focuses on the analysis of the current situation and problems of the administrative protection of copyright in China, respectively from the legislation, law enforcement, citizen copyright awareness, The local protectionism and the connection between the administrative protection and the judicial protection have analyzed the problems existing in the administrative protection of copyright in our country, the fifth part is aimed at the problems existing in the administrative protection of copyright in China. This paper discusses the suggestions for perfecting the administrative protection of copyright in our country. These suggestions correspond to the existing problems, such as legislation, law enforcement and citizen's copyright consciousness. Local protectionism and the connection between administrative protection and judicial protection are expounded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 邱達(dá)春;WTO與中國(guó)商標(biāo)行政保護(hù)革新[J];中華商標(biāo);2002年07期

2 聶士海;;著作權(quán)行政執(zhí)法與司法保護(hù)的銜接之困[J];今日財(cái)富(中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán));2010年02期

3 徐銘勛;;論我國(guó)著作權(quán)行政保護(hù)的特點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

4 劉華;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度運(yùn)行中的政府管制[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2005年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張曉秦;論信息化時(shí)代著作權(quán)的演進(jìn)與法律保護(hù)[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

2 鄧建志;WTO框架下中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 焦娜;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的行政保護(hù)與司法救濟(jì)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 鄧玲;論立法的利益整合功能[D];南京師范大學(xué);2004年

本文編號(hào)：1847149