本文選題：技術(shù)措施 + 版權(quán)法　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：在這個數(shù)字時代,技術(shù)與網(wǎng)絡(luò)的結(jié)合一方面使社會經(jīng)濟文化快速發(fā)展,使人們在獲取知識與利益時得到便利和效率,另一方面卻也為社會利益分配的公正平衡和版權(quán)法律制度的發(fā)展帶來了巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。技術(shù)措施作為版權(quán)人維護自身利益的手段,正是技術(shù)與法律相互作用下的產(chǎn)物,其事前自力救濟性正體現(xiàn)了其本身的優(yōu)越性及存在的必要性。但隨著規(guī)避技術(shù)措施的行為的出現(xiàn),技術(shù)措施的法律保護就不得不提上日程。然而,雖然法律保護技術(shù)措施已不再是一個有爭議的問題,但是由于它與各種制度或利益存在諸多沖突,所以如何適度地保護技術(shù)措施且不損害其他主體的利益就是一個急待解決的重要問題。 目前,保護技術(shù)措施不僅已在世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織的兩條約中得到明確規(guī)定,而且也得到了世界大多數(shù)國家立法上的承認。就我國而言,技術(shù)措施的法律保護也顯得必不可少。版權(quán)法對技術(shù)措施的保護實質(zhì)上是一種確權(quán)性質(zhì)的保護,具有正當(dāng)性及合理性,并且在保護版權(quán)人權(quán)利方面的確有顯著的效果,但其在實際運行過程中也可能會因為法律規(guī)定的不夠充分而被濫用,進而造成立法上的種種沖突。這些沖突是不可避免的,但并不代表不可化解緩和,因此有必要探尋其癥結(jié)所在。而最重要的是,版權(quán)法在權(quán)利保護上所秉持的是利益平衡原則,只有遵循了這個基本原則,才能在規(guī)定技術(shù)措施的版權(quán)法保護的權(quán)利義務(wù)以及其與合理使用等法律制度的銜接方面得到有效的解決辦法。
[Abstract]:In this digital age, the combination of technology and networks, on the one hand, has enabled the rapid development of social, economic and cultural development, making it easier and more efficient for people to acquire knowledge and benefits, On the other hand, it also brings great challenges to the fair balance of social benefit distribution and the development of copyright legal system. Technical measures, as a means for copyright owners to safeguard their own interests, are the products of the interaction between technology and law. Their self-relief in advance embodies their own superiority and the necessity of existence. However, with the emergence of the behavior of circumventing technical measures, the legal protection of technical measures has to be put on the agenda. However, although the legal protection of technical measures is no longer a controversial issue, but because of its many conflicts with various systems or interests, Therefore, how to protect technical measures appropriately without harming the interests of other subjects is an urgent and important problem to be solved. At present, technical protection measures have not only been clearly stipulated in the two treaties of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO), but also recognized by most countries in the world. As far as our country is concerned, the legal protection of technical measures is also necessary. The protection of technical measures by copyright law is, in essence, a kind of right protection, which has legitimacy and reasonableness, and has remarkable effect in protecting the rights of copyright owners. However, it may also be abused because of the insufficiency of the law in the actual operation process, resulting in various conflicts in legislation. These conflicts are inevitable, but do not mean irrevocable detente, so it is necessary to explore the crux of the problem. And most importantly, copyright law upholds the principle of balancing interests in the protection of rights, and only follows this basic principle. Only then can we get an effective solution to the rights and obligations protected by copyright law and its connection with the legal system such as rational use.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐廣良;美國的《數(shù)字千年版權(quán)法》與技術(shù)措施保護制度[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年02期

2 郭禾;規(guī)避技術(shù)措施行為的法律屬性辯析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年10期

3 李士林;論技術(shù)措施之性質(zhì)[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

4 胡啟明;論我國技術(shù)措施版權(quán)保護制度的完善[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2004年02期

5 馮曉青;;技術(shù)措施與著作權(quán)保護探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期

6 楊靜;馬華;;論著作權(quán)技術(shù)措施及法律保護[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年02期

7 張玲艷;鄭淑霞;;對網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下保護著作權(quán)與保護社會公共利益之沖突的理性思考[J];法制與社會;2009年06期

8 ;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護條例[J];中華人民共和國國務(wù)院公報;2006年19期

9 邵忠銀;;技術(shù)措施及其規(guī)避與私力救濟[J];廣西青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期

10 梁志文;技術(shù)措施界定:比較與評價[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 梁志文;[N];人民法院報;2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金鋒;版權(quán)“技術(shù)措施”保護與規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

，

本文編號：1839765