本文選題：作品署名權(quán) + 著作權(quán)��； 參考：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：署名權(quán),即表明作者身份,在作品上署名的權(quán)利。作品作為創(chuàng)作者腦力勞動(dòng)的產(chǎn)物,不僅具有財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值,還反映作者的人格利益和身份利益。作者只有通過在作品上標(biāo)記自己的姓名,以行使表示姓名的權(quán)利才能表明自己作為創(chuàng)作者的身份。作品署名權(quán)是精神權(quán)利的核心,是作者重要的人身權(quán)利,是著作權(quán)的一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)能。在著作權(quán)糾紛中,很多案例都涉及署名權(quán),因此,對(duì)署名權(quán)的正確理解和深入認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)著作權(quán)的保護(hù)有著重要意義。 本文包括引言和結(jié)論在內(nèi),共六個(gè)部分。 引言部分是對(duì)研究對(duì)象的和相關(guān)概念的簡(jiǎn)要說明,以及對(duì)本文選題背景、研究?jī)r(jià)值、研究方法的介紹和闡述。 第一部分主要介紹了作品署名權(quán)的概念、沿革與比較研究。首先,通過界定作品署名權(quán)的概念,闡明署名權(quán)的積極權(quán)能與消極權(quán)能。作者有權(quán)決定在自己的作品上署真名、筆名、或者不署名；作者有權(quán)禁止未參加創(chuàng)作的人在其作品上署名。然后,探析署名權(quán)的起源,比較分析大陸法系和英美法系的沿革。最后,通過以上比較分析來闡述作品署名權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀及問題。 第二部分分析了作品署名權(quán)的性質(zhì)及其價(jià)值。該部分從署名權(quán)的性質(zhì)出發(fā),分別闡述了這一精神權(quán)利的人身權(quán)屬性、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)屬性。同時(shí),對(duì)作品署名權(quán)的價(jià)值進(jìn)行深入分析,分別從文化價(jià)值和經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值的角度進(jìn)行了比較細(xì)致的探討。筆者認(rèn)為作品署名權(quán)作為人身權(quán)利的重要組成部分,不僅具有人格權(quán)和身份權(quán)的屬性,還在一定程度上影響和決定著作品的市場(chǎng)價(jià)值。在價(jià)值論部分,通過對(duì)署名權(quán)的精神文化價(jià)值和經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值的分析,展現(xiàn)了署名權(quán)的精神實(shí)質(zhì)和重要意義。 第三部分在第一、二部分對(duì)作品署名權(quán)概念的界定和性質(zhì)、價(jià)值分析的基礎(chǔ)上,列舉了署名權(quán)在行使中的一些問題。首先,闡述了在署名權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓與繼承的問題,署名權(quán)的人身權(quán)性質(zhì)決定了其具有不可轉(zhuǎn)讓的特性。其次,探析“冒名”行為的性質(zhì),大多數(shù)觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為冒別人之名是對(duì)被冒名人署名權(quán)的一種侵犯。最后,探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的作品署名權(quán),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的飛速發(fā)展給作品署名權(quán)帶來了新的挑戰(zhàn)。 第四部分的主要內(nèi)容是署名權(quán)行使的法律規(guī)制。一方面,闡述了我國(guó)有關(guān)作品署名權(quán)的法律規(guī)定,而后探討了作品署名權(quán)的民事責(zé)任,包括歸責(zé)原則、構(gòu)成要件和侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定。署名權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的歸責(zé)原則應(yīng)當(dāng)實(shí)行過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則,只要行為人盡到了合理的注意義務(wù),就不應(yīng)被課以賠償責(zé)任。另一方面,根據(jù)文章上一部分討論的問題,列舉署名權(quán)正當(dāng)行使的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并探討對(duì)行使署名權(quán)的一些合理限制。 結(jié)論部分將全文各章節(jié)的主要觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了概括和整理,對(duì)于其中的重點(diǎn)問題進(jìn)行了歸納和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The right of authorship, that is, the right to express the identity of the author and to sign on the work. As the product of the creator's mental work, the work not only has property value, but also reflects the author's personal and identity interests. Only by marking his name on the work can the author exercise his right to express his name. The right of authorship is the core of spiritual right, the author's important personal right and the basic power of copyright. In the copyright dispute, many cases are related to the right of signature, therefore, the correct understanding and in-depth understanding of the right of authorship is of great significance to the protection of copyright. This paper includes six parts, including introduction and conclusion. The introduction part is a brief description of the research object and related concepts, as well as the introduction and elaboration of the background, research value and research methods of this paper. The first part mainly introduces the concept, evolution and comparative study of the right of authorship. First of all, by defining the concept of authorship, this paper clarifies the positive and negative power of authorship. The author has the right to decide whether to sign a real name, a pseudonym, or not to sign a name in his work; the author has the right to prohibit anyone who has not participated in the creation from signing the name of his work. Then, the origin of the power of signature is analyzed, and the evolution of the civil law system and the common law system is compared. Finally, through the above comparative analysis to explain the status quo and problems of the international protection of the right of authorship. The second part analyzes the nature and value of the right of authorship. Starting from the nature of the right of signature, this part expounds the attribute of personal right and property right of this spiritual right. At the same time, the author makes a thorough analysis of the value of the right of authorship, and probes into it in detail from the angle of cultural value and economic value. The author thinks that as an important part of personal rights, the authorship of works not only has the attributes of personality rights and identity rights, but also influences and determines the market value of works to a certain extent. In the theory of value, through the analysis of the spiritual, cultural and economic value of the right of authorship, the spiritual essence and significance of the right of authorship are shown. The third part lists some problems in the exercise of the right of authorship on the basis of the definition and nature of the concept of the right of authorship and the analysis of its value in the first and second parts. First of all, the transfer and inheritance of the right of signature are discussed. The nature of the personal right of the right of authorship determines its non-transferable characteristics. Secondly, by analyzing the nature of "impersonation", most people think that taking someone else's name is an infringement of the right to be impersonated. Finally, this paper discusses the authorship of works under the network environment, and the rapid development of the Internet brings new challenges to the authorship of works. The fourth part of the main content is the legal regulation of the exercise of the right of authorship. On the one hand, it expounds the legal provisions of the right of authorship of works in our country, and then discusses the civil liability of the right of authorship of works, including the principle of imputation, the elements of constitution and the determination of tort. The principle of imputation of the right of signature tort should implement the principle of fault liability, so long as the actor has fulfilled the reasonable duty of care, he should not be subject to compensation liability. On the other hand, according to the problems discussed in part of the article, the author enumerates the criteria for the proper exercise of the power of authorship, and probes into some reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the power of authorship. In the conclusion part, the main points of each chapter are summarized and summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱留虎;;署名權(quán)內(nèi)涵、侵權(quán)種類及其賠償數(shù)額[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

2 李大興;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期人的精神需要問題探析[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年04期

3 楊延超;作者精神權(quán)利的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——以其效益價(jià)值為主軸[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2005年01期

4 沈曉鳴;完善我國(guó)現(xiàn)行精神損害賠償制度的若干構(gòu)想[J];法律適用;2004年05期

5 何煉紅;著作人身權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓之合理性研究[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年03期

6 吳星;期刊論文侵權(quán)行為的揭示與辨正[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

7 李姝旖;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)人的精神權(quán)利[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2007年01期

8 周冕;著作人身權(quán)的侵害與救濟(jì)[J];科技與法律;2003年04期

9 董成惠;;作品署名權(quán)內(nèi)容的探討[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

10 孫琳;;不可讓渡的榮耀——作品署名權(quán)異化的法律思考[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1804110