本文選題：思想表達二分法 + 實質性相似��； 參考：《甘肅政法學院學報》2017年05期

【摘要】：學界一直對著作權中思想與表達的區(qū)分持有多種觀點,直至"瓊瑤訴于正案"中法官對此案的分析與判決,司法實踐中終于確定了對這一問題的標準。本文通過闡釋思想表達二分法的法理基礎,分析對比多種適用方法,探究現(xiàn)階段存在的問題,最終提出建設性意見,建議司法實踐中法官通過分析是否接觸、界限位置及受眾感受,綜合多種方法確認兩部作品是否具有實質性相似,使侵權行為無法再存留于思想與表達的模糊邊界。
[Abstract]:The academic circles hold various views on the distinction between thought and expression in copyright until the judge's analysis and judgment in Qiong Yao v. the right case, and the standard of this problem has finally been determined in the judicial practice.By explaining the legal basis of the dichotomy of thought expression, this paper analyzes and compares various applicable methods, probes into the problems existing at the present stage, finally puts forward constructive suggestions, and suggests that judges should contact with each other in judicial practice by analyzing whether they are in contact with each other.The boundary position and the audience's feeling, synthesizes various methods to confirm whether the two works have substantial similarity, so that the tort can no longer exist in the vague boundary of thought and expression.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學;東北財經(jīng)大學;
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 王驍;;淺析思想表達二分法[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年09期

2 盧海君;;論思想表達兩分法的“成文”化[J];中國出版;2010年21期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 徐天一;手機游戲的著作權保護分析[D];北京交通大學;2016年

，

本文編號：1769328