本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：侵權(quán)損害賠償　出處：《上海交通大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的迅猛發(fā)展改變了我們的生活，但也產(chǎn)生了很多新的沖突和糾紛，使得我們不得不考慮重新分配和調(diào)整權(quán)利和利益。新的技術(shù)帶來的法律問題更多的集中在著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)改變了作品的傳播方式，侵權(quán)形式日益復(fù)雜多樣，較傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)更為隱蔽，使得對(duì)著作權(quán)的保護(hù)成了難題。網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)是一種新的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)類型，它使傳統(tǒng)的著作權(quán)理論面臨嚴(yán)峻的考驗(yàn)與挑戰(zhàn)，也使現(xiàn)存立法呈現(xiàn)出明顯的滯后性，甚至造成司法實(shí)踐無法可依，這不僅不利于鼓勵(lì)作者創(chuàng)作創(chuàng)新，而且會(huì)阻礙互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。因此建立、健全我國的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度，促進(jìn)我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)體系的完善，維護(hù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)人的權(quán)益，切實(shí)保障各方利益，顯得尤為重要。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)是基于文學(xué)、藝術(shù)和科學(xué)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性并能以某種有形形式復(fù)制的智力成果，在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下依法產(chǎn)生的權(quán)利。網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)物質(zhì)載體無形，權(quán)利歸屬復(fù)雜，復(fù)制方便快捷，這些特點(diǎn)都決定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)與傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)有著很大的不同，所以網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的侵權(quán)損害賠償也有著自身的特點(diǎn)。在歸責(zé)原則上，網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)應(yīng)同時(shí)適用過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則和無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。在保護(hù)方式上，網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)人既可要求侵權(quán)人賠償損害，也可要求其停止侵害、消除影響、賠禮道歉，還可以兩者并用。網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償范圍包括合理費(fèi)用和補(bǔ)償性賠償，在適度保護(hù)下，一般情況都可適用補(bǔ)償性賠償。侵權(quán)行為發(fā)生后，權(quán)利人實(shí)際損害與侵權(quán)人獲利均難以計(jì)算時(shí)，當(dāng)前法律規(guī)定的50萬以下的法定賠償范圍在適用上沒有統(tǒng)一的參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，需要法官以法律為準(zhǔn)繩，根據(jù)客觀侵權(quán)事實(shí)和法官自己的審判經(jīng)驗(yàn)，仔細(xì)地分析和判斷案情，全面綜合解決當(dāng)事人爭(zhēng)議時(shí)要考慮的因素，最終確定合理的賠償數(shù)額。網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償還應(yīng)考慮精神損害賠償?shù)倪m用，對(duì)于侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作人身權(quán)，即純粹體現(xiàn)人格利益的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)，主要以賠禮道歉和消除影響為主，，輔以精神損害賠償。而對(duì)于涉及財(cái)產(chǎn)利益的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)，則主要以金錢賠償為主。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet has changed our lives, but it has also created many new conflicts and disputes. We have to think about redistributing and adjusting rights and benefits. The legal issues brought about by the new technology are more concentrated in the area of copyright. The Internet has changed the way works are distributed, and the forms of infringement have become increasingly complex and diverse. The network copyright infringement is a new type of copyright infringement, which makes the traditional copyright theory face severe test and challenge. It also causes the existing legislation to show obvious lag, and even causes the judicial practice to be unable to follow, which is not only not conducive to encouraging the author to create and innovate, but also will hinder the healthy development of the Internet industry. It is very important to perfect the system of compensation for network copyright infringement in our country, to promote the perfection of network copyright protection system, to safeguard the rights and interests of network copyright owners and to protect the interests of all parties. Network copyright is a kind of intellectual achievement which has originality in literature, art and science and can be copied in some tangible form. It is a kind of rights produced according to law under the network environment. The material carrier of network copyright is intangible, and the rights belong to complex. These characteristics determine that the network copyright is very different from the traditional copyright, so the network copyright infringement compensation also has its own characteristics. Both the principle of fault liability and the principle of no-fault liability shall be applied to the copyright of the network. In the way of protection, the copyright owner of the network may request the infringer to compensate for the damage, or to demand that the infringer stop the infringement, eliminate the influence, and make an apology. The scope of network copyright infringement damages includes reasonable expenses and compensatory compensation. Under appropriate protection, compensatory compensation can be applied in general. When the actual damage of the obligee and the profit of the infringer are difficult to calculate, there is no uniform standard of reference in the application of the legal compensation scope below 500000 stipulated by the current law, which requires the judge to take the law as the yardstick. According to the facts of objective infringement and the judge's own trial experience, to carefully analyze and judge the case, and to comprehensively and synthetically consider the factors to be taken into account in the settlement of disputes between the parties, Finally determine the reasonable amount of compensation. Network copyright infringement damages should also consider the application of compensation for moral damage, for the infringement of the personal rights of network works, that is, purely reflect the personal interests of the network copyright, Mainly to apologize and eliminate the impact of the main, supplemented by compensation for moral damage, and for the property interests of the network copyright, mainly to the money compensation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 焦和平;;論我國《著作權(quán)法》上“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的完善——以“非交互式”網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為侵權(quán)認(rèn)定為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年06期

2 ;北京市高級(jí)人民法院關(guān)于著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償問題的調(diào)查報(bào)告(上)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年05期

3 劉鐵光;;法定賠償在著作權(quán)司法適用中的變異[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年04期

4 陳加勝;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)與鏈接的關(guān)系[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年02期

5 王遷;;論“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的含義 兼評(píng)“成功多媒體訴時(shí)越公司案”一審判決[J];法律適用;2008年12期

6 申建平;;俄羅斯精神損害賠償制度的啟示與借鑒[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年11期

7 叢立先;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)行為構(gòu)成要件探論[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年05期

8 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

9 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

10 王遷;論版權(quán)法中的間接責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2005年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 華東政法學(xué)院 王遷 博士;[N];文匯報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃山;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1683908