本文選題：著作權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：惡意訴訟　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會(huì)中,以著作權(quán)遭受侵害而提起的訴訟屢見不鮮,而其中的一些不乏是披著訴訟的合法外衣實(shí)現(xiàn)非訴訟目的的民事惡意訴訟。目前我國與之相應(yīng)的法律體系的框架和配套措施尚未出爐,學(xué)界對(duì)民事惡意訴訟的很多基礎(chǔ)性問題還存在很多分歧,如對(duì)“惡意”如何界定、實(shí)踐中應(yīng)該如何認(rèn)定和規(guī)制等。對(duì)民事惡意訴訟問題進(jìn)行更深入、細(xì)致、系統(tǒng)的研究,有助于保護(hù)著作權(quán)人的權(quán)力和利益,同時(shí)對(duì)完善我國的民事訴訟體系有著積極的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文采用案例研究的方法,對(duì)引發(fā)了廣泛爭議的華蓋公司訴重慶二公司侵權(quán)案進(jìn)行分析,詳細(xì)分析案件所涵蓋的具體信息以及案件的審理涉及的法律問題。惡意訴訟是指行為人為了追求不法、不當(dāng)利益或其他非法目的,在缺乏合理的法律事實(shí)和理由的情況下,違反訴訟目的并基于故意而行使法律所賦予的各項(xiàng)訴訟權(quán)利,采取虛構(gòu)事實(shí)、隱瞞真相的方法提起訴訟,侵犯相對(duì)人的合法權(quán)利,給相對(duì)人造成財(cái)產(chǎn)及精神方面損害的訴訟。通過闡述惡意訴訟的概念,構(gòu)成要件,本文著重對(duì)案例中的主要爭議進(jìn)行分析,進(jìn)而判斷本案中原告的訴訟是否構(gòu)成了惡意訴訟。 從案例到法律規(guī)定,從法規(guī)到司法實(shí)踐,案件審理中出現(xiàn)的問題以及社會(huì)輿論對(duì)案件的爭議,折射出了我國現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)于惡意訴訟的認(rèn)定以及如何更好地保護(hù)著作權(quán)方面存在一定的問題。我國現(xiàn)行法律中缺乏關(guān)于惡意訴訟的相關(guān)規(guī)定,沒有定義,制裁規(guī)定不夠清楚,致使關(guān)于惡意訴訟的爭議不斷。著作權(quán)維權(quán)訴訟成本較高,訴訟費(fèi)用沒有包括因?yàn)樵V訟而付出的合理費(fèi)用,嚴(yán)重地影響了權(quán)利人通過訴訟的方式進(jìn)行維權(quán)。本文主要對(duì)以上問題進(jìn)行了分析思索,通過對(duì)一些國家在法律方面對(duì)惡意訴訟和著作權(quán)保護(hù)相關(guān)問題應(yīng)對(duì)做法的借鑒,提出了如何加強(qiáng)著作權(quán)保護(hù)和完善方面的幾點(diǎn)建議。在法律上逐步明確惡意訴訟的定義以及與之對(duì)應(yīng)的侵權(quán)損害賠償制度,構(gòu)建合理確定訴訟費(fèi)負(fù)擔(dān)制度以及在賠償數(shù)額的確定上充分體現(xiàn)權(quán)利人利益全面維護(hù)原則可以減輕權(quán)利人維權(quán)的訴訟成本能夠更有效地保障和維護(hù)著作權(quán)人的權(quán)力和利益,促進(jìn)著作物及其相關(guān)事業(yè)地健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In today's society, lawsuits brought against copyright infringement are common. And some of them are civil malicious litigation in the legal guise of litigation for non-litigation purposes. At present, the framework and supporting measures of the corresponding legal system in our country have not yet been published. There are still many differences in academic circles on many basic issues of civil malicious litigation, such as how to define "malice", how to identify and regulate it in practice, and so on. It is helpful to protect the rights and interests of copyright owners, and has positive practical significance to perfect the civil litigation system of our country. In this paper, the case study is used to analyze the infringement case of Huagai Company v. Chongqing No. 2 Company, which has caused widespread controversy. A detailed analysis of the specific information covered by the case and the legal issues involved in the trial of the case. Malicious litigation refers to the perpetrator's lack of reasonable legal facts and reasons for the pursuit of lawlessness, improper interests or other unlawful purposes, In violation of the purpose of the proceedings and on the basis of intent to exercise all the procedural rights conferred by the law, to institute a lawsuit by means of fictitious facts and to conceal the truth, thereby infringing the legitimate rights of the opposite party, By expounding the concept and elements of malicious litigation, this paper focuses on the analysis of the main disputes in the case, and then determines whether the plaintiff's action constitutes malicious litigation in this case. From cases to legal provisions, from laws and regulations to judicial practice, problems arising in the trial of cases and disputes over cases by public opinion, This reflects that there are certain problems in the identification of malicious litigation and how to better protect copyright in the current law of our country. There are no relevant provisions on malicious litigation in our current law, no definition, and no clear sanctions. The costs of copyright litigation are high, and the costs of litigation do not include the reasonable costs incurred as a result of the litigation. This paper mainly analyzes and ponders the above problems, through the legal aspects of some countries to malicious litigation and copyright protection related issues to learn from the practice. Some suggestions on how to strengthen the protection and perfection of copyright are put forward. In law, the definition of malicious lawsuit and the corresponding system of compensation for infringement damage are clarified step by step. To establish a reasonable system of determining the burden of litigation costs and to fully reflect the principle of full maintenance of the interests of the obligee in determining the amount of compensation can reduce the litigation costs of the right holders to protect and protect the rights and interests of the copyright owners more effectively. To promote the healthy development of works and related undertakings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張曉薇;濫用訴訟權(quán)利之比較研究[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

2 馬治國;張小號(hào);;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟的認(rèn)定及其民法規(guī)制[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年06期

3 卞輝;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟的程序法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年10期

4 辜恩臻;;論訴權(quán)的性質(zhì)及其適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期

5 徐愛國;;英美法中“濫用法律訴訟”的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)家;2000年02期

6 溫后鐘;沈典松;;對(duì)惡意訴訟及其規(guī)制的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年07期

7 張靜;;淺析惡意訴訟侵權(quán)行為[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年15期

8 智敏;;“惡意訴訟”者為“惡意”買單——全國首例知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟案宣判[J];法治與社會(huì);2007年04期

9 周艷波;;規(guī)制惡意訴訟,構(gòu)建正當(dāng)程序[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

10 章曉洪;論惡意訴訟[J];河北法學(xué);2005年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 中國人民大學(xué)教授、博士生導(dǎo)師、民商事法律科學(xué)研究中心副主任 楊立新;[N];廣西政法報(bào);2004年

2 廣西公安干部管理學(xué)院 黃 龍;[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年

3 王加庚;[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 任華;論惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1642558