本文選題：偽滿洲國　切入點：日文報刊　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：《滿洲評論》是在偽滿洲國活躍的日本文人們所創(chuàng)辦的時事評論周刊。1931年8月15日于大連創(chuàng)刊，正值九一八事變勃發(fā)前夕；于1945年7月7日正式�？�，翌月日本宣布無條件投降。從時期上而言，幾乎橫亙偽滿洲國的成立至滅亡的14年歷史。《滿洲評論》共刊行29卷總676期，每半年刊行合集為1卷。1979年至1981年間，前28卷經(jīng)東京龍溪書舍整理翻印出版，作為珍貴文獻(xiàn)在日本偽滿學(xué)術(shù)界受到重視。 《滿洲評論》長期以來受到中日兩國學(xué)界的關(guān)注，且不僅局限于偽滿洲國問題研究領(lǐng)域，由于其史料價值意義重大，近年來更是逐漸受到來自東亞近代史、殖民地文學(xué)、移民問題及思想史研究等諸多學(xué)科領(lǐng)域的關(guān)注。但對《滿洲評論》本身進(jìn)行深度挖掘與系統(tǒng)研究的工作，尚不夠完善。時至今日，伴隨著中日兩國偽滿洲國研究逐漸走向成熟，相關(guān)研究資料日益充實，學(xué)術(shù)研究氛圍逐步自由開放，對《滿洲評論》做出全面研究的外在環(huán)境以及內(nèi)部理由已經(jīng)形成�！稘M洲評論》14年的整理與分析工作變得十分必要。 論文首先著眼《滿洲評論》創(chuàng)刊經(jīng)歷，論述了刊物兩大靈魂人物橘樸與小山貞知的生平和刊物之間的密切關(guān)聯(lián)，從殖民文化移植的角度，求證了刊物誕生初期的思想源泉。其次，，以《滿洲評論》的自身構(gòu)成為核心，通過對時事評論欄目的分期研究，考證了刊物編撰人員的變遷歷程，梳理了雜志在各時期的關(guān)注重點與主張。同時對刊物特輯進(jìn)行了總體的歸類、整理和分析研究，并附有《滿洲評論》大事紀(jì)年及與之關(guān)聯(lián)的偽滿大事紀(jì)，以用作全篇論文的比照。 除了作為刊物主體部分的時事評論之外，構(gòu)成《滿洲評論》的多元化要素同樣極其重要。如佐藤大四郎主導(dǎo)的中國東北農(nóng)村問題研究、山口慎一負(fù)責(zé)的文學(xué)專欄以及小山貞知一手操縱下的相關(guān)滿洲青年聯(lián)盟與協(xié)和會的報道等，均是刊物中不可分割的有機(jī)組成。 最后一章，是將視線從《滿洲評論》這一主體延伸開來，從周邊研究來側(cè)面評定該刊的價值與意義。首先是將中日兩國學(xué)者的既有成果進(jìn)行了梳理和總結(jié)，特別是對其中的不確切和不翔實的地方進(jìn)行了考察與深入研究。其次談到的是，圍繞《滿洲評論》翻印而引發(fā)的、在日本學(xué)術(shù)界知名的“龍溪書舍事件”，該刊的翻印經(jīng)過跌宕起伏，絕不遜色于其創(chuàng)刊歷程，同樣使人饒有興味。滿洲評論社將刊物上登載過的重要文章進(jìn)行整理出版，形成了《滿洲評論叢書》，對這些出版物的發(fā)掘與研究，是考察《滿洲評論》思想史的重要方面。 本論文中對《滿洲評論》本身及其周邊所作出的研究，僅是挖掘了該刊及其時代中社會生活的一角，尚不敢妄稱成熟的研究成果。但其中對《滿洲評論》的拆解與歸類整理方式，較之傳統(tǒng)意義有了一定程度的突破；同時關(guān)注刊物中殖民與軍國主義、馬克思主義傾向兩種力量的抗衡，并科學(xué)合理地將其進(jìn)行區(qū)分對待；對滿洲青年聯(lián)盟和協(xié)和會與刊物之間的關(guān)聯(lián)、刊物中的文學(xué)要素和移民問題報道等方面的整理與研究，為國內(nèi)相關(guān)領(lǐng)域提供了補(bǔ)充；特別是對《滿洲評論》特輯與單行本的挖掘、佐藤大四郎與中國東北農(nóng)村運動的考察以及“龍溪書舍事件”的敘述，都是目前國內(nèi)相關(guān)研究領(lǐng)域尚未完整開掘的部分。從充實偽滿文獻(xiàn)資源、豐富偽滿報刊研究等意義上，希望能夠貢獻(xiàn)一份力量。 《滿洲評論》的相關(guān)研究，僅只是一個開始。相信中日兩國學(xué)界對《滿洲評論》的研究，在不久的將來必定興盛。
[Abstract]:< > in the Manchuria review is the puppet Manchuria government active Japanese people founded the weekly commentary.1931 years of its founding in Dalian in August 15th, 918 when the incident arose on the eve of the official publication; in July 7, 1945, the month following Japan's unconditional surrender. From the perspective of the period, almost through the establishment of cross puppet Manchuria perish 14 years of history. The Manchuria review is published in 29 volumes total > 676, every six months for publication Collection Volume 1.1979 to 1981 years, the first 28 volumes by the Tokyo Longxi Shushe finishing as a precious literature reprint published in Japan, the academic attention.
< > Manchuria review has long been the concern of scholars in China and Japan, and is not limited to the issue in the research field of the puppet Manchuria government, due to its historical value is significant, especially in recent years gradually from East Asian history, colonial literature, immigration and history research concerned many fields. But the depth of excavation and the system research to the Manchuria review work < > itself, is still not perfect. Today, with the Japanese puppet regime in Manchuria to study gradually mature, the related research data is full, free and open academic atmosphere gradually, make a comprehensive research on "Manchuria Review > external environment and internal reasons have been formed collation and analysis work. The Manchuria review >14 is very necessary.
The author reviews published < Manchuria > experience, discusses the close relationship between the two publications the soul Orange Park and Koyama Zhenchi's life and publications, from the colonial culture transplant angle, the confirmation of the source of the birth of the early publications. Secondly, in "Manchuria Review > itself as the core, through the research on the current stage review column, textual changes in the course of publication compiling staff, combing the magazine in the focus and ideas in each period. At the same time of publication special for the overall classification, collation and analysis of the study, with the Manchuria review event calendar > < and associated with the events, this paper used to contrast.
In addition to being the main part of the publication commentary, constitute elements of Manchuria > < diversified comments also is extremely important. Such as the study of Chinese northeast rural problems led by Misaki Sato Oshiro, Yamaguchi Shinichi responsible for the literary column and Koyama Zhenchi Manchuria operate a Youth League and the Union will report, are part of the organic the publication.
The last chapter is to extend the attention away from "the Manchuria Review > this subject, from the side to the surrounding research value and significance of the journal evaluation. The first is the Chinese and Japanese scholars both achievements and summarizes, especially for the exact and detailed local and deeply talking about the research. Secondly, on < Manchuria comments triggered > reprint, in the academic circles in Japan known as the" Longxi sanctum event ", the Journal of the reproduced through ups and downs, not inferior to its founding history, also make people interesting. Manchuria review press will be important articles in journals published. Published, form a review of < Manchuria >, explore and Research on these publications, is an important aspect of" Manchuria Review > in the history of thought.
The research of < Manchuria > comments made by itself and its surrounding, is only a corner of the social life of the Mining Journal and its era, still can't take mature research results. But the "Manchuria Review > dismantling and classification, the traditional has a certain degree of breakthrough; at the same time attention and publications in colonial military doctrine, the Marx doctrine tendency of the two force to contend, and reasonably the distinction; the association between the Manchuria Youth League and association with the publications, collation and research of literary elements and immigration reports and other aspects of the publication, which serves as a supplement to domestic field; especially mining of < Manchuria Review > features and booklet, and China inspects Misaki Sato Oshiro northeast rural sports and the" narrative Longxi sanctum event ", is the current domestic research field No complete digging part. From the literature to enrich the rich resources, the newspaper research significance, hoping to contribute to a force.
The related research in the Manchuria review is only a beginning. It is believed that the study of the Sino Japanese academic circles on the Manchuria review will be prosperous in the near future.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G239.29;K26

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 傅德華,傅駿;百年來“門戶開放”政策研究概述[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年01期

2 淺田喬二;劉含發(fā);鄭毅;;關(guān)于日本帝國主義滿洲移民問題研究的思考[J];吉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1989年03期

3 趙文鐸;;“九·一八事變”對東北農(nóng)村宗族結(jié)構(gòu)的影響[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期

4 趙云鵬;滿鐵、滿鐵檔案資料和滿鐵史研究[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1994年05期

5 高樂才;日本向中國東北地區(qū)“試點”移民及其失敗[J];東北師大學(xué)報;1997年06期

6 陳秀武;;初創(chuàng)期的“協(xié)和會”與偽滿建國精神[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

7 高樂才;日本“滿洲移民”政策的三點透析[J];東北師大學(xué)報;1999年04期

8 趙德祥;試論滿鐵前期的“大連中心主義”政策[J];大連教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年03期

9 金光耀,朱利;《李頓文件》所見之李頓中國之行[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

10 曹必宏;日本對東三省移民概況[J];民國檔案;1991年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李娜;滿鐵對中國東北的文化侵略[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

2 劉建華;偽滿協(xié)和會研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

3 段永富;美國對偽滿洲國政策研究（1931-1941）[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 房忠婧;滿鐵與東北殖民地化研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2006年

2 許銀珠;日本侵略朝鮮半島時期（1910-1945）中國東北地區(qū)的朝鮮人移民研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1635678