本文選題：表達(dá)自由　切入點(diǎn)：著作權(quán)　出處：《安徽師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)，隨著現(xiàn)代科學(xué)技術(shù)的不斷進(jìn)步，作為憲法學(xué)領(lǐng)域概念的表達(dá)自由與作為民法學(xué)領(lǐng)域概念的著作權(quán)發(fā)生著越來越多的聯(lián)系。雖然《中華人民共和國(guó)憲法》將表達(dá)自由這一基本人權(quán)用“言論、出版、結(jié)社、集會(huì)、游行、示威的自由”、“提出批評(píng)和建議的權(quán)利”、“申訴、控告或者檢舉的權(quán)利”等形式表現(xiàn)了出來，賦予了其至高無上的地位，但在現(xiàn)實(shí)中，，作為財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的著作權(quán)卻屢屢對(duì)作為基本人權(quán)和憲法性權(quán)利的表達(dá)自由發(fā)生著沖擊和侵蝕。 如何正確認(rèn)識(shí)表達(dá)自由與著作權(quán)的關(guān)系，如何妥善處理兩者之間的沖突，是目前亟待解決的問題。對(duì)于此問題，當(dāng)前學(xué)界研究甚少，國(guó)際上也缺乏完善的制度參考。要真正解決好這個(gè)問題，需要從以下方面著手：首先，應(yīng)明晰有關(guān)表達(dá)自由與著作權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)理論，尤其是價(jià)值理論，為正確處理兩者關(guān)系在理念上樹立參照系。其次，結(jié)合我國(guó)的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，通過構(gòu)建行為模式的觀察視角，對(duì)表達(dá)自由與著作權(quán)的行為進(jìn)行對(duì)應(yīng)分析，并通過分類的方式，對(duì)兩者的關(guān)系進(jìn)行梳理，進(jìn)而分為相容關(guān)系與沖突關(guān)系，再依據(jù)更加具體的原因，對(duì)相容關(guān)系和沖突關(guān)系作出進(jìn)一步細(xì)分。最后，以價(jià)值理念為導(dǎo)向，對(duì)表達(dá)自由與著作權(quán)的沖突關(guān)系提出了協(xié)調(diào)規(guī)則，從對(duì)著作權(quán)保護(hù)進(jìn)行憲法審查、通過設(shè)立第三方幫助機(jī)構(gòu)明確對(duì)技術(shù)措施的限制、禁止標(biāo)準(zhǔn)合同規(guī)避著作權(quán)的限制及例外、擴(kuò)大著作權(quán)的合理使用范圍、縮短著作權(quán)的保護(hù)期限這五個(gè)方面來對(duì)表達(dá)自由與著作權(quán)的沖突關(guān)系進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)。相信在正確理念的引導(dǎo)下，建立的一系列規(guī)則，有助于我國(guó)形成更為順達(dá)、暢通的表達(dá)環(huán)境，而這不僅是實(shí)現(xiàn)表達(dá)自由的途徑，同時(shí)也是著作權(quán)價(jià)值的真正回歸。
[Abstract]:In China, with the continuous progress of modern science and technology, Freedom of expression, as a concept in the field of constitutional law, is increasingly linked to copyright as a concept in the field of civil law. Although the Constitution of the people's Republic of China uses freedom of expression as a fundamental human right, "speech, publication, association and assembly, The freedom to march and demonstrate, "the right to criticize and make suggestions," and "the right to complain, sue, or report," and other forms have given it a supreme status, but in reality, Copyright, as a property right, often impacts and erodes the freedom of expression as a basic human right and a constitutional right. How to correctly understand the relationship between freedom of expression and copyright, and how to properly handle the conflict between them, is a problem to be solved. In order to really solve this problem, we need to start from the following aspects: first, we should clarify the basic theory of freedom of expression and copyright, especially the theory of value. In order to correctly deal with the relationship between the two in the concept of establishing a reference system. Secondly, combined with the relevant laws and regulations of our country, through the construction of the behavior model of the observation perspective, the freedom of expression and copyright behavior of the corresponding analysis, and through the way of classification, Combing the relationship between the two, and then divided into compatible relationship and conflict relationship, and then according to more specific reasons, to make a further subdivision of the compatibility relationship and conflict relationship. This paper puts forward the coordination rules for the conflict between freedom of expression and copyright, including the constitutional review of copyright protection, the establishment of third-party help agencies to clarify the restrictions on technical measures, and the prohibition of standard contracts from circumventing the restrictions and exceptions of copyright. In order to coordinate the conflict between freedom of expression and copyright, we should expand the scope of fair use of copyright and shorten the duration of copyright protection. I believe that under the guidance of correct ideas, a series of rules will be established. It is helpful for our country to form a more smooth and unimpeded expression environment, which is not only a way to realize freedom of expression, but also a true return of copyright value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 宋慧獻(xiàn);;財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)多元論與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的非人權(quán)性[J];北方法學(xué);2011年03期

2 吳漢東;李瑞登;;中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué)研究30年[J];法商研究;2010年03期

3 張?jiān)婪?;作品的社會(huì)屬性是作品的本質(zhì)屬性[J];河北學(xué)刊;2010年05期

4 劉莘,金石;政府對(duì)新聞自由管制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管窺[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2004年03期

5 杜承銘;論表達(dá)自由[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年03期

6 宋慧獻(xiàn);;利益分配的工具:版權(quán)制度的價(jià)值論分析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年03期

7 吳漢東;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的多元屬性及研究范式[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年05期

8 樊百樂;;以真相為唯一出發(fā)點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)報(bào)道;2011年11期

本文編號(hào)：1587811