本文關(guān)鍵詞： 搜索引擎 過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則 網(wǎng)頁快照 避風(fēng)港 紅旗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 著作權(quán)與傳播技術(shù)的發(fā)展進(jìn)步有著密切聯(lián)系,每一次傳播技術(shù)的進(jìn)步都會(huì)帶來著作權(quán)保護(hù)的相關(guān)新問題的產(chǎn)生。互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的產(chǎn)生與進(jìn)步同樣引起了很多有關(guān)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的挑戰(zhàn),也從另一方面促進(jìn)了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)事業(yè)的進(jìn)步。 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)給人們帶來的利益在于其開放性、兼容性、快捷性與跨國(guó)傳播。面對(duì)爆炸的網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息,信息時(shí)代呼喚著一種信息定位工具的出現(xiàn),于是搜索引擎誕生了。搜索引擎的產(chǎn)生就是為了方便用戶搜索文件,為社會(huì)帶來了便利。隨著搜索引擎服務(wù)的發(fā)展,搜索引擎變得更加人性化、專業(yè)化、多樣化,涌現(xiàn)出各種人性的服務(wù),在提供傳統(tǒng)的鏈接服務(wù)的同時(shí),還提供鏈接網(wǎng)頁信息的“網(wǎng)頁快照”服務(wù)。搜索結(jié)果也更加細(xì)化,涌現(xiàn)出圖片搜索、音樂搜索等經(jīng)過服務(wù)商精心整理過的更“人性化”,更精細(xì)的搜索服務(wù)。然而,這種服務(wù)進(jìn)步、升級(jí)的同時(shí),也引起了著作權(quán)保護(hù)的糾紛。 “葉延濱訴搜狐、新浪網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案”被稱為“中國(guó)搜索引擎第一案”,引起了關(guān)于搜索引擎是否侵犯著作權(quán)的思考。“十一家唱片公司訴搜狐音樂搜索侵權(quán)”認(rèn)定了搜索引擎侵權(quán)性質(zhì),確立了認(rèn)定搜索與鏈接服務(wù)提供者主觀過錯(cuò)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),然而,北京市高級(jí)人民法院對(duì)“浙江泛亞電子商務(wù)有限公司訴百度公司侵犯著作權(quán)案”的宣判結(jié)果卻與“搜狐案”截然相反。這些案件引起了有關(guān)搜索引擎網(wǎng)頁快照是否侵權(quán)、搜索鏈接是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán)、如何認(rèn)定搜索與鏈接服務(wù)提供者主觀過錯(cuò)、搜索與鏈接服務(wù)提供者什么條件下承擔(dān)責(zé)任、什么條件下才能免責(zé)等問題的思考。本文通過分析搜索引擎服務(wù)的特征,結(jié)合國(guó)際上相關(guān)的法律規(guī)定,嘗試解釋以上問題。 除了引言和結(jié)論部分,全文分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分主要分析搜索引擎的原理以及近年出現(xiàn)的相關(guān)法律問題、典型案例。第二部分主要分析搜索引擎相關(guān)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為類型,闡述了搜索引擎主要會(huì)涉及著作權(quán)中的復(fù)制權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)。第三部分分析搜索引擎服務(wù)提供者的侵權(quán)責(zé)任,明確搜索引擎提供者的過錯(cuò)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則和相關(guān)的法律責(zé)任,并分析免責(zé)條件以及過錯(cuò)的認(rèn)定。第四部分針對(duì)我國(guó)的現(xiàn)有法律制度的缺失提出筆者的一些完善建議。
[Abstract]:Copyright is closely related to the development and progress of communication technology. Each time the progress of communication technology will bring about new problems related to copyright protection. The emergence and progress of Internet technology has also caused a lot of challenges about copyright protection. On the other hand, it has promoted the progress of intellectual property protection. The benefits brought by the Internet lie in its openness, compatibility, rapidity and transnational communication. In the face of the explosion of network information, the information age calls for the emergence of an information location tool. So search engine was born. Search engine is to facilitate users to search for files, for the community to bring convenience. With the development of search engine services, search engines become more humanized and professional. Diversified, the emergence of a variety of human services, while providing traditional link services, but also provide links to web page information "web snapshot" service. The search results are more refined, emerging image search. Music search is a more "humanized" and more sophisticated search service that has been carefully arranged by service providers. However, the progress and upgrading of this service has also led to disputes over copyright protection. "Ye Yanbin v. Sohu, Sina network infringement case" is called "China's first search engine case." Has caused the ponder about whether the search engine infringes the copyright. "11 record companies v. Sohu music search infringement" confirmed the search engine infringement nature. The criteria for determining the subjective fault of search and link service providers are established, however. The verdict of Beijing higher people's Court on Zhejiang Pan Asia Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. V. Baidu Company infringing copyright case is related to Sohu case. On the contrary, these cases give rise to whether search engine page snapshots are infringing. Whether the search link constitutes infringement, how to identify the subjective fault of the search and link service provider, and under what conditions the search and link service provider should bear the responsibility. This paper analyzes the characteristics of search engine service and tries to explain the above problems by analyzing the characteristics of search engine service and combining with the relevant international laws and regulations. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into four parts: the first part mainly analyzes the principles of search engines and related legal issues in recent years. The second part mainly analyzes the types of copyright infringement related to search engine. The third part analyzes the tort liability of search engine service provider. Clear search engine provider fault liability attribution principle and related legal liability. Part 4th puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the existing legal system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 田玲玲;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)研究——以盛大文學(xué)訴百度公司案為例[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年03期

2 楊佳;鄭海味;;搜索引擎的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)形式及約束機(jī)制探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年33期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 陳佶利;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 徐娟;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商間接侵權(quán)法律問題研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

3 王嬋;網(wǎng)頁快照服務(wù)的版權(quán)問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

4 顧鑫;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任比較研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

5 陶慧蘊(yùn);搜索引擎“快照”類服務(wù)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1475410