本文選題：當(dāng)代中國 + 族際關(guān)系治理　； 參考：《云南大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：族際關(guān)系治理“是當(dāng)代多民族國家民族政治生活中的首要問題”。①所謂族際關(guān)系治理,從政治學(xué)角度來看,就是民族國家運(yùn)用國家權(quán)力對(duì)影響族際關(guān)系和諧、穩(wěn)定、發(fā)展的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及社會(huì)各類要素進(jìn)行調(diào)適、整合、克服、消除的政治過程。其實(shí)質(zhì)是“民族國家運(yùn)用國家權(quán)力,將國內(nèi)各民族結(jié)合成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的政治共同體,以及維護(hù)這個(gè)共同體的政治過程�！雹谄淠康氖峭ㄟ^對(duì)民族關(guān)系的協(xié)調(diào)和治理,保證民族國家與國家內(nèi)構(gòu)成民族之間的良性互動(dòng)與良性發(fā)展。 族際關(guān)系治理的核心是價(jià)值取向的選擇問題。對(duì)價(jià)值取向的選擇并不是一成不變的,而是由民族國家建設(shè)所處的歷史階段性所決定的。在民族與國家結(jié)合的過程中,為了使民族擁有一個(gè)能夠維護(hù)自身利益的政治共同體,現(xiàn)實(shí)民族的獨(dú)立和自強(qiáng),需要以民族為中心來構(gòu)建一個(gè)政治共同體——民族國家,因此,“以民族為中心的國家構(gòu)建”的特征十分明顯,主要體現(xiàn)出鮮明的“民族主義”的價(jià)值.取向選擇；在民族與國家結(jié)合完成后,為了維護(hù)各民族共同的政治共同體——民族國家的主權(quán)與權(quán)威,實(shí)現(xiàn)民族國家的高度統(tǒng)一,需要以國家為中心來構(gòu)建一個(gè)具有共同政治認(rèn)同的國家民族,因此,“以國家為中心的民族構(gòu)建”的特征十分明顯,主要體現(xiàn)出鮮明的“國家主義”的價(jià)值取向選擇。一種價(jià)值取向選擇能夠多大程度上構(gòu)建一個(gè)國家,就會(huì)在多大程度上解構(gòu)一個(gè)民族國家。因此,科學(xué)地判定民族國家所處的階段性,進(jìn)行合理的價(jià)值取向選擇和調(diào)整,是當(dāng)代族際關(guān)系治理的核心問題。 從當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理的具體歷史過程來看,新中國成立以來,在中國共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,各民族擁有了發(fā)展新型族際關(guān)系的平臺(tái),為當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系的和諧發(fā)展奠定了制度基礎(chǔ)和提供了政治前提。但是數(shù)千年歷史中所形成的舊有族際關(guān)系格局仍是一種現(xiàn)實(shí)存在,并發(fā)揮著雙重影響：一方面是各民族相互交融、表現(xiàn)為良性關(guān)系的持續(xù)、延伸與發(fā)展；另一方面則是各民族之間摩擦沖突、表現(xiàn)為非良性關(guān)系的繼續(xù)存在。嚴(yán)峻的國際環(huán)境,資本主義國家體系將我國族際關(guān)系中非良性關(guān)系視為顛覆新中國政權(quán)的一個(gè)重要突破口。這些情況決定了新中國成立以后,很長(zhǎng)一個(gè)時(shí)期內(nèi)黨和國家族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向選擇,主要是在維護(hù)傳統(tǒng)族際關(guān)系歷史格局基礎(chǔ)上,消除少數(shù)民族與漢族之間的差別,推動(dòng)各個(gè)少數(shù)民族的發(fā)展,使其真正成為掌握國家政權(quán)的民族,致力于鞏固新生的民族國家與國家政權(quán)�？梢哉f,1956年“一化三改造”完成以后,到1978年改革開放之前,我國族際關(guān)系治理更多體現(xiàn)出“以民族為中心的國家構(gòu)建”的特征,即民族到國家的“民族主義”價(jià)值取向。1978年改革開放以后,隨著國家對(duì)內(nèi)改革、對(duì)外開放的全面深入,國家獲得了快速發(fā)展。這一時(shí)期,各民族作為中華民族的一員,都獲得了巨大的利益,但是從國內(nèi)視野來看,各民族所獲得的利益是非均衡的。盡管所有民族都獲得了發(fā)展,但是民族之間的差距卻呈現(xiàn)出了持續(xù)擴(kuò)大的局面。國內(nèi)民族之間、尤其是同其他國家內(nèi)民族之間發(fā)展情況的對(duì)比,激發(fā)了國內(nèi)各個(gè)民族的整體性意識(shí),民族對(duì)自我的認(rèn)同不斷增強(qiáng)。而民族意識(shí)的增強(qiáng),確實(shí)也為民族在與國家的博弈中帶來了諸多現(xiàn)實(shí)利益,這在一定的程度上誘發(fā)了民族意識(shí)的進(jìn)一步增強(qiáng)。同時(shí),世界民族國家體系內(nèi)“民族主義”思潮中“民族分離主義”及“泛民族主義”的興起,對(duì)我國民族國家建設(shè)構(gòu)成了現(xiàn)實(shí)威脅, “以民族為中心的國家構(gòu)建”的價(jià)值取向選擇亟待調(diào)整。從西方發(fā)達(dá)民族國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)來看,當(dāng)代中國在民族國家建立完成后,為了減少國內(nèi)族際關(guān)系中非良性關(guān)系對(duì)民族國家的沖擊,應(yīng)將族際關(guān)系治理價(jià)值取向調(diào)整到更加注重“以國家為中心的民族構(gòu)建”上來,通過這一價(jià)值取向選擇,構(gòu)建具有共同認(rèn)同的國家民族,從而為當(dāng)代中國民族國家建設(shè)提供堅(jiān)實(shí)的民族基礎(chǔ)。 但是,族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向作為一種意識(shí)形態(tài),并不具備自我實(shí)現(xiàn)的能力,必須通過民族國家的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)等方式來實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)族際關(guān)系的具體治理。族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向與治理方式之間存在著這樣的關(guān)系：價(jià)值取向離不開具體手段的支撐,只有合理的價(jià)值取向,沒有強(qiáng)大的國家機(jī)器及必要的手段做支撐,價(jià)值取向無法獨(dú)立的發(fā)揮作用,這也能部分地解釋為什么具有相似族際關(guān)系問題,相同價(jià)值取向選擇的國家,其治理結(jié)果差異很大的問題；而具體的治理方式離開了合理的價(jià)值取向?yàn)橹笇?dǎo),不僅無法解決族際關(guān)系問題,甚至?xí)谀撤N程度上導(dǎo)致族際關(guān)系問題激化,影響民族國家建設(shè),甚至導(dǎo)致民族國家解體,這一問題在當(dāng)代民族國家體系中也不乏實(shí)例。族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向,總是會(huì)在具體的治理方式中得以體現(xiàn),而通過對(duì)族際關(guān)系治理方式的分析,也可以分析出一個(gè)階段內(nèi)族際關(guān)系治理的基本價(jià)值取向。因此,當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理分析的關(guān)鍵,就是透過紛繁復(fù)雜的治理方式,考察隱藏在其背后的價(jià)值取向選擇問題。 當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理是通過族際關(guān)系治理價(jià)值取向與族際關(guān)系治理方式之間的具體互動(dòng)來實(shí)現(xiàn)的,而這一關(guān)系鮮明地體現(xiàn)在民族國家建設(shè)與民族國家發(fā)展的互動(dòng)關(guān)系之中。所謂的民族國家建設(shè),就是民族國家運(yùn)用國家權(quán)力,將國內(nèi)各民族結(jié)合成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的政治共同體,以及維護(hù)這個(gè)共同體的政治過程,①而民族國家建設(shè)的核心內(nèi)容,是由民族國家基本特征民族性、人民性和主權(quán)性等三個(gè)基本特征派生而來的,是通過不斷增強(qiáng)民族國家基本特征而得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的。只有持續(xù)進(jìn)行這三個(gè)方面的建設(shè),保證各民族對(duì)國家政權(quán)的控制、保證各民族對(duì)國家領(lǐng)土的認(rèn)同與維護(hù),保證各民族權(quán)利的平等與實(shí)現(xiàn),才能保證國家的生存與發(fā)展�？梢哉f,以民族國家基本特征為內(nèi)容的國家建設(shè)構(gòu)成了當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系的價(jià)值向度,無論是“以民族為中心的國家構(gòu)建”,還是以“以國家為中心的民族構(gòu)建”,都是具體包含著民族性、人民性及主權(quán)性這三個(gè)具體的價(jià)值建設(shè)內(nèi)容。所謂的民族國家發(fā)展,就是民族國家構(gòu)成民族在國家的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)等基本制度引導(dǎo)下的發(fā)展。首先體現(xiàn)為橫向發(fā)展,即民族政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)四者之間在各民族中的均衡、合理發(fā)展上。四者均衡發(fā)展,是當(dāng)代中國民族國家構(gòu)成民族獲得充分發(fā)展的必要條件和根本保證。其次體現(xiàn)為縱向發(fā)展,即民族政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)四者之間發(fā)展的連貫性與持續(xù)性。對(duì)于當(dāng)代中國來說,民族國家發(fā)展是民族國家持續(xù)存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)任務(wù)。沒有國家發(fā)展,就沒有民族發(fā)展,民族發(fā)展是民族國家發(fā)展的載體與最終目的。因此,當(dāng)代中國民族國家發(fā)展中的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及社會(huì)發(fā)展,事實(shí)上就是民族國家構(gòu)成民族的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)的具體發(fā)展,而各民族政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及社會(huì)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r及由此而形成交錯(cuò)復(fù)雜的族際關(guān)系,恰恰是當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理的對(duì)象。從這意義上來說,當(dāng)代中國國家政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及社會(huì)發(fā)展中關(guān)于族際關(guān)系治理的內(nèi)容,就構(gòu)成了族際關(guān)系治理的主要方式。 民族國家建設(shè)與民族國家發(fā)展之間的互動(dòng)貫穿了當(dāng)代民族國家族際關(guān)系治理的全過程。民族國家建設(shè)作為一種基本的價(jià)值取向,由族際關(guān)系政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)治理等維度中民族性、人民性及主權(quán)性特征的分向度構(gòu)成；而族際關(guān)系政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)治理等維度中也必然體現(xiàn)著民族性、人民性及主權(quán)性特征等向度,成為族際關(guān)系治理價(jià)值取向的主要標(biāo)桿�；谝陨险J(rèn)識(shí),本研究將族際關(guān)系治理中所蘊(yùn)含的價(jià)值取向與治理維度之間的互動(dòng)關(guān)系,作為當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理的分析框架與根本方法來使用。 有鑒于此,本研究基于民族國家建設(shè)與民族國家發(fā)展之間互動(dòng)的分析框架,對(duì)當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分政治治理、經(jīng)濟(jì)治理、文化治理及社會(huì)治理視野的描述和分析,構(gòu)成了本研究的主要內(nèi)容。首先分視野地對(duì)我國族際關(guān)系治理中的主要方式及功能進(jìn)行了梳理。其次,在對(duì)治理的主要方式進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)其中所蘊(yùn)含的族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向進(jìn)行了具體、詳細(xì)的分析,對(duì)其中的問題進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。再次,對(duì)經(jīng)過幾十年治理后,當(dāng)代中國的族際關(guān)系中的新情況與問題進(jìn)行了具體分析�？傮w上來說,本研究回顧了當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系的治理背景,探討了族際關(guān)系治理的深層次價(jià)值取向選擇動(dòng)因,評(píng)價(jià)了族際關(guān)系治理的得與失,提出了為了應(yīng)對(duì)族際關(guān)系的新變化、新問題,應(yīng)將治理價(jià)值取向從“以民族為中心的國家構(gòu)建”轉(zhuǎn)換到更加注重“以國家為中心的民族構(gòu)建”上來的具體建議。 當(dāng)然,當(dāng)代中國的族際關(guān)系治理,是涉及到民族和民族國家這對(duì)復(fù)雜的社會(huì)歷史現(xiàn)象的一個(gè)政治過程,既要兼顧“民族屬性”,滿足“多民族國家的特點(diǎn)與各民族生存和發(fā)展的內(nèi)在要求”①,即民族主義的國家建設(shè)與發(fā)展要求；又要兼顧“國家屬性”,保證各民族的發(fā)展必須有利于政治共同體的統(tǒng)一與維護(hù),即國家主義的國家建設(shè)與發(fā)展要求。離開了民族國家建設(shè)的向度,背離了維護(hù)多民族國家統(tǒng)一的價(jià)值取向,族際關(guān)系治理就會(huì)偏離正確軌道,破壞民族國家的存在；離開了民族國家發(fā)展——在橫向與縱向方面的均衡發(fā)展,背離了充分尊重各民族在各級(jí)建設(shè)與發(fā)展中的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化和社會(huì)權(quán)益和利益,民族國家建設(shè)就無法得到各民族的支持和認(rèn)同,民族國家建設(shè)也無法實(shí)現(xiàn)。簡(jiǎn)言之,當(dāng)代中國的族際關(guān)系治理,必須具體問題具體分析,區(qū)分不同民族和不同區(qū)域,既注重民族認(rèn)同意識(shí)的維護(hù),又強(qiáng)化國家認(rèn)同意識(shí)的生成,避免從一個(gè)極端走向另一個(gè)極端,一種傾向掩蓋另一種傾向。 在這一認(rèn)識(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上,本研究最后對(duì)當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理進(jìn)行了反思和總結(jié),提出了應(yīng)該轉(zhuǎn)換當(dāng)代中國族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向、調(diào)整治理路徑,構(gòu)建族際關(guān)系治理價(jià)值取向的評(píng)估機(jī)制,并對(duì)中國族際關(guān)系治理的價(jià)值取向選擇、具體治理路徑及族際關(guān)系治理價(jià)值取向的評(píng)估機(jī)制構(gòu)建,提出了有針對(duì)性的建議。
[Abstract]:The governance of inter ethnic relations is the first problem in the national political life of contemporary multi-ethnic countries. (1) the so-called inter ethnic relations governance, from the political point of view, is the political, economic, cultural and social elements of the national state using the state power to adjust, integrate, overcome and eliminate the political, economic, cultural and social factors that affect the ethnic relations in harmony, stability and development. The essence of the process is "the use of state power in the national state, the integration of all nationalities in the country into a unified political community and the maintenance of the political process of the community." the purpose is to ensure the benign interaction and benign development between the national state and the nation through the coordination and governance of the ethnic relations.
The core of the governance of inter ethnic relations is the choice of value orientation. The choice of value orientation is not invariable, but is determined by the historical stage of the construction of national state. In the process of combining national and state, in order to make the nation have a political community that can maintain self interest, the reality of the nation is independent. And self strengthening, we need to build a political community - a nation state centered on the nation. Therefore, the characteristics of the "nation centered state" are very obvious, which mainly embodies the value of "nationalism" and the choice of orientation; after the combination of the nation and the state, it is to safeguard the common political community of all ethnic groups. The sovereignty and authority of the nation and the authority to realize the high unity of the nation and state need to build a national nation with a common political identity with the state as the center. Therefore, the characteristic of "national construction" is very obvious, which mainly embodies the choice of the distinct "nationalism" value orientation. To the extent to which choice can build a country, it will deconstruct a nation state to what extent. Therefore, it is the core issue for the governance of contemporary inter ethnic relations to scientifically determine the stages of the national state and to choose and adjust the reasonable value orientation.
Since the founding of the new China, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, all ethnic groups have developed a platform for the development of new ethnic relations, which has laid the foundation for the harmonious development of the contemporary Chinese ethnic relations and provided the political premise for the harmonious development of the contemporary Chinese ethnic relations. But the old people formed in the thousands of years of history have formed the old ethnic group. The interrelationship pattern is still a real existence, and plays a double influence. On the one hand, it is the integration of all ethnic groups, showing the continuity, extension and development of the benign relationship; on the other hand, the friction and conflict between the nationalities, showing the continuing existence of non benign relations. The non benign relationship in the relationship is regarded as an important breakthrough in the subversion of the new China regime. These circumstances determine the choice of the value orientation of the governance of the inter family relations between the party and the country for a long period of time after the founding of the new China, mainly on the basis of maintaining the historical pattern of the traditional ethnic relations and eliminating the differences between the ethnic minorities and the Han people, and the promotion of the difference between the ethnic minorities and the Han nationality. The development of each ethnic minority makes it truly a nation of state power and is committed to consolidating the new national state and state power. It can be said that, after the completion of "one transformation and three transformation" in 1956, and before the reform and opening up in 1978, the governance of ethnic relations in our country embodies the characteristics of "national construction in a national center". After the reform and opening up of national to national "nationalism" value orientation in.1978, with the national reform and opening to the outside world, the country has gained rapid development. In this period, all ethnic groups, as a member of the Chinese nation, have gained great interests. However, from the domestic perspective, the interests obtained by all ethnic groups are uneven. In spite of the development of all ethnic groups, the gap between ethnic groups has shown a continuous expansion. The contrast between national ethnic groups, especially the development of ethnic groups in other countries, has stimulated the overall consciousness of all ethnic groups in China, and the national identity has been enhanced by the nation. It also brings many practical interests in the game of the nation with the state, which has caused the further enhancement of national consciousness to a certain extent. At the same time, the rise of "national separatism" and "Pan nationalism" in the "nationalism" trend of thought in the world national national system constitutes a realistic threat to the construction of our nation state.
In order to reduce the impact of non benign relations on national countries, the value orientation of ethnic international relations should be adjusted to pay more attention to the "nation" after the establishment and completion of the national countries. The building of the family as the center is to build a national nation with a common identity through this choice of value orientation, thus providing a solid national foundation for the construction of the contemporary Chinese national state.
However, as a kind of ideology, the value orientation of inter ethnic relationship governance does not have the ability to realize self. It must realize the specific governance through the political, economic, cultural and social ways of the nation state. There is such a relationship between the value orientation of the governance of inter ethnic relations and the way of Governance: the value orientation. It is inseparable from the support of specific means, only a reasonable value orientation, no strong national machine and necessary means to support, the value orientation can not play an independent role, which can partly explain why the countries with similar ethnic relations and the same choice of value orientation have a large difference in their governance results; The governing way of the body has left the reasonable value orientation as the guidance, not only can not solve the problem of inter ethnic relations, even to some extent, it will lead to the intensification of inter ethnic relations, influence the construction of national state and even cause the disintegration of the nation state. This problem is not lack of examples in the contemporary national national system. The value of the governance of the inter ethnic relations is taken. It will always be embodied in the concrete way of governance, and through the analysis of the governance mode of inter ethnic relations, it can also analyze the basic value orientation of the governance of inter ethnic relations in a stage. Therefore, the key to the analysis of the governance of contemporary China's inter ethnic relations is to examine the value hidden behind it through complex and complex governance. Choice of orientation.
The governance of contemporary China's inter ethnic relations is realized through the specific interaction between the value orientation of inter ethnic relations and the governance mode of ethnic relations. This relationship is clearly reflected in the interaction between national state construction and national state development. The so-called national state construction is the national power and the domestic power. All ethnic groups are integrated into a unified political community and maintain the political process of the community. The core content of the national state construction is derived from the three basic characteristics of the national state, the national character, the people's nature and the sovereignty, and is realized through the continuous enhancement of the basic characteristics of the nation and state. In order to ensure the survival and development of the national rights, the construction of the three aspects, ensuring the control of the national regime, ensuring the identity and maintenance of all ethnic groups to the national territory, guaranteeing the equality and Realization of the rights of all nationalities can guarantee the existence and development of the country. The value direction of the Department, whether it is "built in a nation centered country" or "constructed by a nation centered nation", is the three specific value construction content, including national nature, people's nature and sovereignty. The so-called national state development is the political, economic, cultural and cultural elements of the nation state in the state. The development of the basic system of society, which is guided by the basic system, is first reflected in the balanced and rational development among the four ethnic groups, namely, the national politics, the economy, the culture and the society. The balanced development of the four people is the necessary condition and the fundamental guarantee for the full development of the ethnic countries in the contemporary China. The second is the vertical development. The development of national politics, economy, culture and society is the continuity and continuity between the four people. For contemporary China, the development of national state is the realistic task of national state. Without national development, there is no national development, national development is the carrier and ultimate aim of national national development. The political, economic, cultural and social development in the exhibition, in fact, is the specific development of the political, economic, cultural and social development of the nation state, and the political, economic, cultural and social development of all ethnic groups and the formation of interlaced complex inter ethnic relations, which is precisely the object of the governance of contemporary China's inter ethnic relations. It is said that in contemporary China's political, economic, cultural and social development, the content of inter ethnic relations governance constitutes the main way of governance of inter ethnic relations.
The interaction between national state construction and national state development runs through the whole process of the governance of ethnic national relations. National state construction, as a basic value orientation, consists of ethnic, people and sovereign characteristics in the political, economic, cultural and social governance dimensions of ethnic relations; and ethnic relations. In the dimensions of political, economic, cultural and social governance, the dimensions of nationality, people and sovereignty are also the main benchmarks for the value orientation of inter ethnic relationship governance. Based on the above understanding, this study takes the interaction between the value orientation and the governance dimension contained in the governance of ethnic relations as a contemporary Chinese family. The analysis framework and fundamental method of interrelation governance are used.
In view of this, this study is based on the analysis framework of the interaction between national state construction and national development. The description and analysis of political governance, economic governance, cultural governance and social governance in contemporary China constitutes the main content of this study. First, the field is divided into the management of inter ethnic relations in China. The main ways and functions are combed. Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of the main ways of governance, the value orientation of the inter ethnic relationship management contained in it is detailed, detailed analysis, and a summary of the problems. On the whole, this study reviews the governance background of contemporary China's inter ethnic relations, probes into the reasons for the choice of the deep level value orientation of the inter ethnic relationship governance, and evaluates the gains and losses of the governance of inter ethnic relations, and puts forward a new problem in order to deal with the new transformation of inter ethnic relations, and the value orientation of governance should be from "ethnic minorities". The transformation of "centered country building" to concrete proposals that focus more on "nation-centered national construction".
Of course, the governance of inter ethnic relations in contemporary China is a political process involving the complex social and historical phenomena of ethnic and national states, which should not only take into account the "national attributes", but also meet the "inherent requirements of the characteristics of multi-ethnic countries and the survival and development of all nationalities", that is, the national construction and development requirements of nationalism; Taking care of the "state property", ensuring the development of all ethnic groups must be beneficial to the unity and maintenance of the political community, that is, the national construction and development requirements of nationalism, leaving the orientation of national national construction and deviating from the value orientation of maintaining the unity of multi-ethnic countries, and the governance of ethnic relations will deviate from the correct track and destroy the survival of the national state. In the absence of National State Development - a balanced and vertical development in the horizontal and vertical aspects, it deviates from the full respect for the economic, political, cultural and social interests and interests of all ethnic groups at all levels of construction and development, and the national state construction will not be supported and recognized by all ethnic groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：C95

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鐘貴峰;;論多民族國家的族際關(guān)系治理[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2100839