本文選題：政治統(tǒng)一　切入點(diǎn)：文化多元　出處：《湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：在近代中國(guó)由王朝天下向現(xiàn)代國(guó)家轉(zhuǎn)變的過(guò)程中,漢族知識(shí)精英們長(zhǎng)期圍繞西方"一族一國(guó)"的民族建國(guó)模式探討新型國(guó)家的組織結(jié)構(gòu)問(wèn)題,形成了"夷漢同源說(shuō)"、"中華民族是一個(gè)"等旨在構(gòu)建一個(gè)"中華民族"以因應(yīng)民族國(guó)家理論的思考路徑。事實(shí)上,當(dāng)時(shí)已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生民族意識(shí)覺(jué)醒的西南少數(shù)民族精英們自有一套實(shí)現(xiàn)多民族凝聚于一個(gè)政治共同體的邏輯,他們提出的統(tǒng)一國(guó)家認(rèn)同與文化多元訴求,揭示了民族共生理論的另一種思路。
[Abstract]:In the course of the transition from dynasty to modern country in modern China, the intellectual elites of Han nationality have long discussed the organizational structure of the new country around the model of "one nation, one country" in the West. The formation of "Yi Han homologous theory", "the Chinese nation is one" and other aims to build a "Chinese nation" in response to the national theory of the path of thinking. In fact, At that time, the southwest minority elites, who had already awakened their national consciousness, had their own logic of realizing the unity of ethnic groups in a political community. They put forward a unified national identity and diverse cultural demands. It reveals another way of thinking about the theory of national symbiosis.
【作者單位】： 南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)人文與政治教育學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C95

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 楊毅;論西南少數(shù)民族檔案的源頭[J];云南社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年S1期

2 王文光;朱映占;;承認(rèn)與認(rèn)同:民國(guó)西南少數(shù)民族的身份建構(gòu)[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

3 陳雪英;;西南少數(shù)民族災(zāi)難認(rèn)知圖示、敘事及傳統(tǒng)應(yīng)對(duì)[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年07期

4 熊麗芬;李R，

本文編號(hào)：1689455