本文選題：田野調(diào)查　切入點(diǎn)：民族志反思　出處：《云南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年02期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：民族志的反思揭示了人類(lèi)學(xué)田野調(diào)查中主、客體互為觀察和研究對(duì)象的客觀存在,深刻意識(shí)到這種存在會(huì)顯著影響到觀察的結(jié)果和研究的結(jié)論。因此,在收集、記錄各種田野資料的同時(shí),研究者自身的具體參與過(guò)程及其與被觀察者之間的各種交往和互動(dòng)——田野關(guān)系——也越來(lái)越多地被納入到研究者思考的范疇。但是這種反思大多是研究者對(duì)自身固有的身份及自己的參與對(duì)研究關(guān)系造成的影響的自我剖析,并未能充分考慮被研究者對(duì)研究者動(dòng)機(jī)、行為的反應(yīng)而造成的對(duì)研究者觀察與研究的影響。只有當(dāng)研究者在"我看人"——"我看我"http://www.cnki.com.cn/"我看我看人"的同時(shí)充分自覺(jué)地做到"我看人看我"時(shí),民族志方法的反思才會(huì)更加完善,田野調(diào)查的效果才會(huì)更有成效。
[Abstract]:The introspection of ethnography reveals the objective existence of subjects and objects in anthropological fieldwork. They are deeply aware that such existence can significantly affect the results of observation and the conclusion of research. While recording all kinds of field information, The specific participation process of the researchers themselves and their interactions and interactions with the observers-field relations-are increasingly brought into the scope of the researchers' thinking. But this kind of reflection is mostly the researchers' fixation on themselves. Self-analysis of the impact of identity and participation on research relationships, Did not fully consider the researcher's motivation to the researcher, The effects of behavioral responses on researchers' observation and research. Only when researchers are "I look at people"-"I see me"-"I look at people," and fully consciously "I see people look at me." The reflection of ethnography method will be more perfect and the effect of field investigation will be more effective.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)社會(huì)發(fā)展學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)宗教藝術(shù)遺產(chǎn)調(diào)查與數(shù)字化保存整理研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):11&ZD185)階段成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C95-0
，

本文編號(hào)：1613417