養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式及影響因素研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-17 07:24
【摘要】：目的了解養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式現(xiàn)狀,分析養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式的影響因素,提出改善養(yǎng)老護理員生活方式狀況的建議。方法本研究采用便利抽樣的方法,對杭州市養(yǎng)老機構(gòu)的285名養(yǎng)老護理員進行問卷調(diào)查,研究工具包括:《一般情況調(diào)查問卷》、《健康促進生活方式量表II》、《健康行為能力自評量表》、《自覺健康狀態(tài)量表》、《健康概念量表》、《工作滿意度問卷》,采用統(tǒng)計軟件SPSS20.0進行數(shù)據(jù)分析。結(jié)果1.養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式總得分為114.75±9.46。各維度得分分別為:人際關(guān)系23.80±3.16分,營養(yǎng)19.49±2.10分,健康責任19.84±2.40分,自我實現(xiàn)19.17±3.66分,壓力管理17.58±2.98分,運動14.86±2.26分。經(jīng)標準化處理后,排序由高到低依次為人際關(guān)系、健康責任、壓力管理、營養(yǎng)、自我實現(xiàn)、運動。2.養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式52個條目的均分為2.21±0.18。經(jīng)標準化處理,得分為55.17%。52個條目中,得分最低的10個條目均分為1.43±0.21,其中,與營養(yǎng)有關(guān)的3個條目均分為1.44±0.58,與運動有關(guān)的3個條目均分為1.43±0.44。3.養(yǎng)老護理員自覺健康狀態(tài)、健康行為自我效能、健康概念和工作滿意度總得分分別為:6.21±1.13分、47.67±12.50分、130.12±7.33分、64.51±7.15分。4.單因素分析結(jié)果顯示:不同性別、文化程度、照顧人數(shù)以及宗教信仰的養(yǎng)老護理員在健康促進生活方式得分之間的差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。自覺健康狀態(tài)、健康行為自我效能、健康概念、工作滿意度與健康促進生活方式總得分均呈正相關(guān)(P0.05)。5.多重線性回歸分析結(jié)果顯示:性別、文化程度、照顧人數(shù)、宗教信仰、自覺健康狀態(tài)、健康行為自我效能等6個自變量進入回歸方程,可解釋養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式總變異量的61.5%。結(jié)論1.養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式得分總體處于一般水平。在健康促進生活方式的6個維度中,人際關(guān)系表現(xiàn)最好,其余依次為健康責任、壓力管理、營養(yǎng)、自我實現(xiàn),運動表現(xiàn)最差。2.養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式存在的主要問題包括:睡眠嚴重不足,缺乏壓力自我調(diào)節(jié)的知識和技能;不知道如何選擇低脂、低膽固醇食品,不注意閱讀食品標簽,不能保證每天喝牛奶、酸奶或者豆?jié){;很少關(guān)注自身內(nèi)在的需求,忽略對實現(xiàn)自我價值和社會價值的追求;運動鍛煉嚴重不足,不能有計劃地進行鍛煉,無法達到預(yù)期強度,運動時不數(shù)脈搏。3.養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式主要影響因素包括:性別、文化程度、照顧人數(shù)、宗教信仰、健康行為自我效能和自覺健康狀態(tài)。女性養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式水平高于男性;有宗教信仰的養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式水平高于無宗教信仰養(yǎng)老護理員;文化程度越高的養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式水平越高;照顧人數(shù)越多的養(yǎng)老護理員健康促進生活方式水平越低;養(yǎng)老護理員健康行為自我效能越高、自覺健康狀態(tài)越好,越能采取健康促進生活方式。
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the current situation of health promotion of old-age care workers, analyze the influencing factors of health promotion of old-age nurses, and put forward some suggestions to improve the living style of old-age nurses. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 285 carers of pension institutions in Hangzhou by means of convenience sampling. The research tools included: general situation questionnaire, Health Promotion lifestyle scale (II), self rating scale of Health behavior ability, conscious Health State scale, Health Conceptual scale, Job satisfaction questionnaire, data analysis by SPSS20.0. Result 1. The total score of health promotion life style was 114.75 鹵9.46. The scores of each dimension were: interpersonal relationship 23.80 鹵3.16, nutrition 19.49 鹵2.10, health responsibility 19.84 鹵2.40, self-actualization 19.17 鹵3.66, stress management 17.58 鹵2.98, exercise 14.86 鹵2.26. After standardized treatment, the order from high to low is interpersonal relationship, health responsibility, stress management, nutrition, self-actualization, exercise. 2. The 52 items for health promotion of carers were 2. 21 鹵0. 18. After standardized treatment, the 10 items with the lowest score were 1.43 鹵0.21 out of 55.17 and 52 items, among which, the three items related to nutrition were all divided into 1.44 鹵0.58, and the three items related to exercise were all divided into 1.43 鹵0.44.3. The total scores of self-efficacy, health concept, health concept and job satisfaction of the carers were 47.67 鹵12.50, 130.12 鹵7.33 and 64.51 鹵7.15, respectively. The total scores of health care workers were 6.21 鹵1.13 and 64.51 鹵7.15 respectively. The results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in the scores of health promotion lifestyle between care workers of different gender, education level, number of carers and religious beliefs (P0.05). Conscious health state, healthy behavior self-efficacy, health concept, job satisfaction and total score of health promotion lifestyle were positively correlated (P0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender, education, number of care, religious belief, conscious health status, self-efficacy of healthy behavior entered the regression equation. It can explain 61.5% of the total variation of health promotion lifestyle. Conclusion 1. The health promotion life style score of old-age care workers is generally in the general level. Among the 6 dimensions of health promoting lifestyle, interpersonal relationships performed best, while the others were health responsibility, stress management, nutrition, self-actualization, and exercise performance. 2. The main health problems of carers in promoting lifestyle include: severe lack of sleep, lack of knowledge and skills of stress self-regulation, lack of knowledge on how to choose low-fat, low-cholesterol foods, and lack of attention to reading food labels. There is no guarantee of drinking milk, yogurt or soy milk every day; little attention is paid to their inherent needs and the pursuit of self-worth and social value is neglected; the exercise is so inadequate that it is not able to exercise in a planned way and to achieve the desired intensity. Do not count the pulse. 3. The main factors influencing the health promotion of carers include gender, education, number of care, religious belief, self-efficacy of healthy behavior and conscious state of health. The health promotion life style level of female old-age care workers is higher than that of men, the health promotion life style level of religious care workers is higher than that of non-religious care workers. The higher the education level, the higher the health promotion life style level of the carers; the lower the health promotion lifestyle level of the care workers; the higher the self-efficacy of the health behavior, the better the conscious health status. The more you can adopt a healthy lifestyle.
【學位授予單位】：杭州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R47
，
本文編號：2245152
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the current situation of health promotion of old-age care workers, analyze the influencing factors of health promotion of old-age nurses, and put forward some suggestions to improve the living style of old-age nurses. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 285 carers of pension institutions in Hangzhou by means of convenience sampling. The research tools included: general situation questionnaire, Health Promotion lifestyle scale (II), self rating scale of Health behavior ability, conscious Health State scale, Health Conceptual scale, Job satisfaction questionnaire, data analysis by SPSS20.0. Result 1. The total score of health promotion life style was 114.75 鹵9.46. The scores of each dimension were: interpersonal relationship 23.80 鹵3.16, nutrition 19.49 鹵2.10, health responsibility 19.84 鹵2.40, self-actualization 19.17 鹵3.66, stress management 17.58 鹵2.98, exercise 14.86 鹵2.26. After standardized treatment, the order from high to low is interpersonal relationship, health responsibility, stress management, nutrition, self-actualization, exercise. 2. The 52 items for health promotion of carers were 2. 21 鹵0. 18. After standardized treatment, the 10 items with the lowest score were 1.43 鹵0.21 out of 55.17 and 52 items, among which, the three items related to nutrition were all divided into 1.44 鹵0.58, and the three items related to exercise were all divided into 1.43 鹵0.44.3. The total scores of self-efficacy, health concept, health concept and job satisfaction of the carers were 47.67 鹵12.50, 130.12 鹵7.33 and 64.51 鹵7.15, respectively. The total scores of health care workers were 6.21 鹵1.13 and 64.51 鹵7.15 respectively. The results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in the scores of health promotion lifestyle between care workers of different gender, education level, number of carers and religious beliefs (P0.05). Conscious health state, healthy behavior self-efficacy, health concept, job satisfaction and total score of health promotion lifestyle were positively correlated (P0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender, education, number of care, religious belief, conscious health status, self-efficacy of healthy behavior entered the regression equation. It can explain 61.5% of the total variation of health promotion lifestyle. Conclusion 1. The health promotion life style score of old-age care workers is generally in the general level. Among the 6 dimensions of health promoting lifestyle, interpersonal relationships performed best, while the others were health responsibility, stress management, nutrition, self-actualization, and exercise performance. 2. The main health problems of carers in promoting lifestyle include: severe lack of sleep, lack of knowledge and skills of stress self-regulation, lack of knowledge on how to choose low-fat, low-cholesterol foods, and lack of attention to reading food labels. There is no guarantee of drinking milk, yogurt or soy milk every day; little attention is paid to their inherent needs and the pursuit of self-worth and social value is neglected; the exercise is so inadequate that it is not able to exercise in a planned way and to achieve the desired intensity. Do not count the pulse. 3. The main factors influencing the health promotion of carers include gender, education, number of care, religious belief, self-efficacy of healthy behavior and conscious state of health. The health promotion life style level of female old-age care workers is higher than that of men, the health promotion life style level of religious care workers is higher than that of non-religious care workers. The higher the education level, the higher the health promotion life style level of the carers; the lower the health promotion lifestyle level of the care workers; the higher the self-efficacy of the health behavior, the better the conscious health status. The more you can adopt a healthy lifestyle.
【學位授予單位】：杭州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R47
，
本文編號：2245152
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/linchuangyixuelunwen/2245152.html
最近更新
教材專著
