本文選題：甲卡西酮成癮 + 冰毒成癮��； 參考：《中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:探討甲卡西酮成癮者和冰毒成癮者的決策特點。方法:從某強制隔離戒毒所篩選出甲卡西酮成癮者45人,冰毒成癮者41人,從某大學(xué)后勤工作人員中招募對照組被試33人,分別使用沖動性量表(BIS-11)、杯子任務(wù)研究被試的沖動性水平和決策特點。結(jié)果:冰毒成癮組的沖動性顯著高于對照組和甲卡西酮成癮組;在收益情境下,甲卡西酮成癮組和冰毒成癮組選擇風(fēng)險選項的比例顯著高于對照組,甲卡西酮成癮組和對照組比冰毒成癮組選擇更多的適應(yīng)性選項;在損失情境下,三組被試選擇風(fēng)險選項和適應(yīng)性選項的比例不存在顯著差異。結(jié)論:在收益情境下,成癮組比對照表現(xiàn)出更明顯的風(fēng)險決策偏好,只有冰毒成癮組表現(xiàn)出非適應(yīng)性決策。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the decision-making characteristics of methamphetamine addicts and meth addicts. Methods: a total of 45 methicarone addicts and 41 methamphetamine addicts were selected from a compulsory isolation drug treatment center, and 33 control subjects were recruited from the logistics staff of a university. Impulse scale (BIS-11) was used to study the impulse level and decision-making characteristics of the subjects. Results: the impulsiveness of methamphetamine addiction group was significantly higher than that of control group and megasone addiction group, and the proportion of choice of risk options in methamphetamine addiction group and meth addiction group was significantly higher than that in control group. Compared with meth addiction group, Mecca addiction group and control group chose more adaptive options, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of risk option and adaptive option between the three groups under the situation of loss. Conclusion: in the income situation, the addiction group showed a more obvious risk decision preference than the control group, and only the meth addiction group showed a non-adaptive decision.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;中國政法大學(xué)社會學(xué)院;長治大辛莊強制隔離戒毒所;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目(15BSH085) 北京市社會科學(xué)基金一般項目(15SHB019);北京市社會科學(xué)基金一般項目(14JYB018) 中國政法大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)研究項目;中國政法大學(xué)重點學(xué)科應(yīng)用心理學(xué);中國政法大學(xué)博士創(chuàng)新實踐項目(2016BSCX17)資助
【分類號】：R749.64
，

本文編號：2004532