本文選題：經(jīng)外周置入中心靜脈導(dǎo)管 + 血管深度�。� 參考：《護(hù)理研究》2017年12期

【摘要】：[目的]探討不同深度血管經(jīng)外周置入中心靜脈導(dǎo)管(PICC)穿刺過程中導(dǎo)針器分離時(shí)機(jī)。[方法]將我院擬行超聲引導(dǎo)下PICC置管300例病人按照隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為兩組,對(duì)照組150例病人(其中血管深度≤1cm者設(shè)為A1組,而血管深度1cm者設(shè)為B1組)采用常規(guī)導(dǎo)針器分離法;觀察組150例病人(其中血管深度≤1cm者設(shè)為A2組,血管深度1cm者設(shè)為B2組)采用延遲導(dǎo)針器分離法。比較兩組一次導(dǎo)絲置入及置管成功率、疼痛評(píng)分、操作時(shí)間的差異。[結(jié)果]觀察組一次導(dǎo)絲置入成功率為97.3%,對(duì)照組為90.7%,兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);A2組一次導(dǎo)絲置入成功率(97.3%)高于A1組(84.0%),兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01);B1組一次導(dǎo)絲置入成功率為96.0%,B2組為98.7%,兩組比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。[結(jié)論]延遲導(dǎo)針器分離有助于提高PICC置管導(dǎo)絲置入成功率,尤其對(duì)于血管深度≤1cm病人。
[Abstract]:[objective] to investigate the time of needle guide separation during central venous catheterization (PICC) with different depths of blood vessels. [methods] 300 patients with PICC catheterization under ultrasound guidance were divided into two groups according to the random digital table method, and the control group (150 patients with vascular depth 鈮，

本文編號(hào)：1941926