本文選題：輸血不良反應(yīng) + 評估分級��； 參考：《中國輸血雜志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的參考美國輸血不良反應(yīng)診斷標準,對四川省20家三級醫(yī)院2014年部分上報輸血不良反應(yīng)進行回顧性評估分級,對輸血不良反應(yīng)分級評估方法進行初步嘗試,希望為日后輸血不良反應(yīng)分類分級評估標準的制定和輸血預(yù)警系統(tǒng)的建立提供借鑒。方法隨機抽取四川省19個地市20家三級醫(yī)院2014年上報輸血不良反應(yīng)166例,根據(jù)患者輸血前后生命體征的變化情況、臨床癥狀、相關(guān)實驗室檢查等對輸血不良反應(yīng)進行重新診斷評估,從"不良反應(yīng)類型的肯定程度"、"反應(yīng)的嚴重程度"以及"反應(yīng)與輸血相關(guān)可能性的大小"3個方面進行分級。結(jié)果1)從"反應(yīng)類型的肯定程度"方面分析,98.14%(158例)的輸血不良反應(yīng)能夠根據(jù)患者臨床表現(xiàn)進行較為準確的類型判斷;1.86%(3例)的輸血不良反應(yīng),患者未出現(xiàn)符合定義標準的明確臨床表現(xiàn),評估結(jié)果為"疑似"。2)從"反應(yīng)嚴重程度"方面分析,93.98%(156例)為輕中度輸血不良反應(yīng),可自行緩解或于臨床干預(yù)后迅速緩解;6.02%(10例)為重度輸血不良反應(yīng),臨床癥狀嚴重,雖然于對癥處理后緩解,但普遍缺少相關(guān)后續(xù)檢查和原因追蹤。3)從"反應(yīng)與輸血相關(guān)可能性的大小"方面分析,93.37%(155例)的不良反應(yīng)經(jīng)評估后"輸血相關(guān)性極高",患者癥狀肯定是由輸血原因?qū)е?6.63%(11例)的不良反應(yīng)則可能是由輸血以外的其它原因?qū)е碌?存在并非輸血不良反應(yīng)的可能性。結(jié)論輸血不良反應(yīng)的評估分級能夠增加輸血不良反應(yīng)判斷結(jié)果的準確性和嚴謹性,有利于及時對患者進行后續(xù)檢查和原因分析,避免輸血不良反應(yīng)錯報漏報,提高輸血安全,進而為日后輸血不良反應(yīng)分類分級標準的制定和輸血預(yù)警系統(tǒng)的建立奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Objective referring to the diagnostic criteria of adverse reaction of blood transfusion in the United States, the adverse reactions of transfusion in 20 hospitals in Sichuan province in 2014 were evaluated retrospectively, and the methods of classification evaluation of adverse reactions of blood transfusion were preliminarily tried. It is hoped to provide reference for the establishment of classification and grading criteria for blood transfusion adverse reactions and the establishment of blood transfusion warning system. Methods 166 cases of adverse reactions of blood transfusion were randomly selected from 20 tertiary hospitals in 19 prefectures and cities of Sichuan province in 2014. According to the changes of vital signs before and after transfusion, the clinical symptoms were analyzed. The related laboratory tests were used to re-diagnose and evaluate the adverse reactions of blood transfusion, which were classified into three aspects: "the positive degree of adverse reaction type", "severity of reaction" and "the possibility of reaction and transfusion related". Results 1) from the point of view of "positive degree of reaction type", the adverse reactions of blood transfusion in 158 cases (98.14%) could be judged according to the clinical manifestations of the patients by a more accurate classification of 1.86% of the blood transfusion adverse reactions. There was no definite clinical manifestation according to the defined criteria. The result of evaluation was "suspected". (2) 156 cases of "severity of reaction" were analyzed as mild and moderate adverse reactions of blood transfusion. 10 cases of severe adverse reactions of blood transfusion were relieved by self-relief or rapid relief after clinical intervention. The clinical symptoms were severe, although they were relieved after symptomatic treatment. But there is a general lack of follow-up examination and cause tracing. 3) Analysis of the adverse reactions from the perspective of "the likelihood of reaction and blood transfusion" (155 cases) the adverse reactions were assessed as "extremely relevant to blood transfusion", and the cause of the patient's symptoms must have been caused by blood transfusion. In 11 cases, the adverse reactions may be caused by something other than blood transfusions. There is the possibility that there is no adverse reaction to blood transfusion. Conclusion the evaluation and grading of adverse reactions of blood transfusion can increase the accuracy and rigour of the results of adverse reactions of blood transfusion, which is helpful to carry out follow-up examination and cause analysis in time, to avoid misreporting of adverse reactions of blood transfusion, and to improve the safety of blood transfusion. It will lay a foundation for the establishment of classification and classification standard of adverse reactions of blood transfusion and the establishment of early warning system for blood transfusion.
【作者單位】： 中國醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學(xué)院輸血研究所;
【分類號】：R457.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊威,李春義;輸血不良反應(yīng)的預(yù)防與處理[J];小兒急救醫(yī)學(xué);2001年03期

2 范垂姝;李尊嚴;金海甲;石建宏;欒靜;;輸血不良反應(yīng)及其預(yù)防[J];中國社區(qū)醫(yī)師(綜合版);2004年19期

3 葉漢深;林俊華;張普山;陳漫標;;輸血不良反應(yīng)的回顧分析[J];廣州醫(yī)藥;2006年01期

4 霍軍;王金枝;;臨床輸血不良反應(yīng)調(diào)查及預(yù)防[J];檢驗醫(yī)學(xué)與臨床;2007年02期

5 石光;;輸血不良反應(yīng)及相關(guān)疾病的防治[J];中國實用婦科與產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年03期

6 李彩芳;;輸血不良反應(yīng)的分析[J];醫(yī)藥論壇雜志;2007年08期

7 吳曉君;施宜;楊秀鳳;;輸血不良反應(yīng)的原因探討[J];醫(yī)學(xué)檢驗與臨床;2007年04期

8 李日華;;輸血不良反應(yīng)99例的回顧調(diào)查[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);2008年12期

9 任艷麗;李春華;陳金美;;57例急性輸血不良反應(yīng)的臨床分析[J];北京醫(yī)學(xué);2009年02期

10 蔣俊煌;林素霞;嚴俊;;臨床輸血不良反應(yīng)的回顧性分析[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前7條

1 李春華;單茗;任艷麗;;輸血不良反應(yīng)監(jiān)測網(wǎng)絡(luò)的建立[A];中國輸血協(xié)會第三屆輸血大會論文專輯[C];2004年

2 林甲進;朱碎永;;輸血不良反應(yīng)回顧分析[A];2007年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)檢驗學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2007年

3 許德義;張哲;彭明喜;董國飛;莊立;朱興德;張朝云;倪建萍;高家良;馬幼麗;徐冉行;;輸血不良反應(yīng)的實驗研究及臨床調(diào)查[A];中國輸血協(xié)會第五屆輸血大會論文專集（摘要篇）[C];2010年

4 王學(xué)謙;;輸血不良反應(yīng)反應(yīng)的幾種類型及其機制[A];新世紀 新機遇 新挑戰(zhàn)——知識創(chuàng)新和高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展（下冊）[C];2001年

5 崔紅霞;段榮花;張愛淑;高文麗;;臨床輸血不良反應(yīng)及應(yīng)對[A];全國內(nèi)科護理學(xué)術(shù)交流暨專題講座會議論文匯編[C];2002年

6 蘭炯采;陳靜嫻;孫先玲;;非感染性輸血不良反應(yīng)的“三步”分析診斷實驗[A];中國輸血協(xié)會第五屆輸血大會論文專集（摘要篇）[C];2010年

7 馮祖楨;;對云南省怒江傈僳族自治州人民醫(yī)院全血輸血及成分輸血不良反應(yīng)的調(diào)查[A];第四屆全國臨床檢驗學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 滕方;我國輸血不良反應(yīng)現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查及預(yù)防控制策略措施探討[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1813617