發(fā)布時間：2018-01-05 14:40

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：中文版自我效能評定量表在社區(qū)居住老年人中應(yīng)用的信效度研究　出處：《中國全科醫(yī)學(xué)》2017年29期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 自我效能 社會隔離 老年人 信度 效度

【摘要】：目的翻譯并評價預(yù)防社會隔離的自我效能評定量表(CSES)在社區(qū)居住老年人中應(yīng)用的信效度。方法 2017年1—4月,采用便利抽樣法在遼寧省沈陽市、錦州市、鞍山市、遼陽市、盤錦市、大連市對1 023名符合要求的社區(qū)居住老年人發(fā)放問卷。采用中文版CSES、中文版社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)量表(LSNS-6)、一般自我效能感評定量表(GSES)對其進(jìn)行調(diào)查。評價中文版CSES的效度與信度。結(jié)果共發(fā)放問卷1 023份,回收1 009份,有效問卷982份,有效回收率為96.0%。CSES總分與LSNS-6總分的相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.79(P0.001);CSES總分與GSES總分的相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.83(P0.001)。各條目的內(nèi)容效度指數(shù)(CVI)為0.750~1.000,平均CVI值為0.910。主成分分析法抽取2個維度,累積貢獻(xiàn)率達(dá)67.67%。驗(yàn)證性因子分析顯示,擬合指標(biāo)近似誤差均方根(RMSEA)為0.041,擬合優(yōu)度指數(shù)(GFI)為0.985,調(diào)整擬合優(yōu)度指數(shù)(AGFI)為0.972,比較擬合指數(shù)(CFI)為0.990。平均條目-總分相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.71,量表總Cronbach'sα系數(shù)為0.86,社區(qū)網(wǎng)絡(luò)Cronbach'sα系數(shù)為0.84,鄰里守望Cronbach'sα系數(shù)為0.83,重測信度系數(shù)為0.90。結(jié)論中文版CSES具有較好的信效度,可用于社區(qū)居住老年人預(yù)防社會隔離的自我效能評估。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the reliability and validity of CSEs in the elderly living in community. Methods from 2017 to April. Convenience sampling method was used to distribute questionnaires to 1 023 elderly people living in communities in Shenyang, Jinzhou, Anshan, Liaoyang, Panjin and Dalian, Liaoning Province. The Chinese version of CSES was used. Chinese version of social network scale LSNS-6). General Self-efficacy scale (GSES) was used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of CSES. Results 1 023 questionnaires were sent out and 1 009 copies were recovered. The correlation coefficient between the total score of CSES and the total score of LSNS-6 was 0.79 P0.001; The correlation coefficient between the total score of CSES and the total score of GSES was 0.83g P0.0010.The content validity index (CVI) of each item was 0.750 / 1.000. The average CVI value was 0.910. Two dimensions were extracted by principal component analysis (PCA) and the cumulative contribution rate was 67.67.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that. The approximate error of fitting index RMSEAA was 0.041, the index of goodness of fit (GFI) was 0.985, and the adjusted index of goodness of fit (AGFI) was 0.972. The relative fitting index (CFI) was 0.990. The correlation coefficient of the average item-total score was 0.71, and the total Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of the scale was 0.86. The Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of community network was 0.84, and the Cronbach's 偽 coefficient of neighborhood watch was 0.83. Conclusion the Chinese version of CSES has a good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the self-efficacy of the elderly in community to prevent social isolation.
【作者單位】： 錦州醫(yī)科大學(xué)護(hù)理學(xué)院;
【基金】：全國高等醫(yī)學(xué)教育科學(xué)項(xiàng)目基金(GJHLZ160018)
【分類號】：R473.2
【正文快照】： 社會隔離,即缺乏社交網(wǎng)絡(luò),包括與他人的聯(lián)系和社會支度方面:采用LSNS-6和GSES作為校標(biāo)關(guān)聯(lián)量表計算相關(guān)系持(情感、信息和幫助)不足[1]。老年群體社會隔離的風(fēng)險數(shù),評估校標(biāo)效度;內(nèi)容效度[16]由8名相關(guān)領(lǐng)域?qū)＜也捎?較高,并且社會隔離已被確定為健康狀況不佳,幸福感缺失和級評

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 姜巖石;安力彬;王晉榮;袁華;張冉;趙妍妍;;護(hù)理人員計算機(jī)能力前測量表的信效度研究[J];護(hù)理研究;2011年12期

2 邵亞;廖少玲;鐘慧琴;卜淑娟;文若蘭;;護(hù)士工作相關(guān)生活質(zhì)量量表的信效度研究[J];護(hù)理學(xué)雜志;2014年13期

3 黃春平;劉彥慧;年慶婷;崔穎;;護(hù)士結(jié)構(gòu)性授權(quán)測評工具中文版信效度研究[J];中華護(hù)理雜志;2011年12期

，

本文編號：1383580