太初歷的紀(jì)年問題——太歲紀(jì)年法被淘汰的原因
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-17 17:54
【摘要】：戰(zhàn)國、秦到漢初,古人確曾用過太歲紀(jì)年。但東漢以后,太歲紀(jì)年為什么被淘汰?太初歷所定"百四十四歲而太歲超一辰"是否準(zhǔn)確?文章從十干和歲陽的對應(yīng)、攝提格與假歲星混用等7個(gè)方面作了大膽、新穎的論述。
[Abstract]:Warring States, Qin to the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the ancients did use the year. But after the Eastern Han Dynasty, why was Taiyyear eliminated? Is it accurate to say "one hundred forty-four years old and too old over one hour" in the Taichu calendar In this paper, the author makes a bold and novel discussion from seven aspects, such as the correspondence between the ten cadres and the year yang, and the mixed use of the photo Tige and the false year star.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)科學(xué)技術(shù)史研究院;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“《崇禎歷書》中的‘法’與‘?dāng)?shù)’及其在中國的嬗變”(10863001)
【分類號(hào)】：P192
[Abstract]:Warring States, Qin to the beginning of the Han Dynasty, the ancients did use the year. But after the Eastern Han Dynasty, why was Taiyyear eliminated? Is it accurate to say "one hundred forty-four years old and too old over one hour" in the Taichu calendar In this paper, the author makes a bold and novel discussion from seven aspects, such as the correspondence between the ten cadres and the year yang, and the mixed use of the photo Tige and the false year star.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)科學(xué)技術(shù)史研究院;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“《崇禎歷書》中的‘法’與‘?dāng)?shù)’及其在中國的嬗變”(10863001)
【分類號(hào)】：P192
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 汪大白;;戴震《屈原賦注》思想內(nèi)涵的自我超越——以《離騷》解說為中心[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期
2 張二雄;魏耕原;;《離騷》疑義補(bǔ)闕[J];安康學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期
3 鮑紅;《離騷》“求女”喻意五說得失辨[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期
4 郭春陽;;“女Z，
本文編號(hào)：2338622
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/tianwen/2338622.html
教材專著
