新城新藏的中國(guó)天文學(xué)史研究初探——以《東洋天文學(xué)史研究》為中心
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-20 18:40
【摘要】:對(duì)新城新藏(1873-1938)的學(xué)術(shù)背景和研究進(jìn)路進(jìn)行了考察。較為全面地研究了《東洋天文學(xué)史研究》中的天文歷算工作。梳理出其所涉的三大領(lǐng)域:先秦天文歷法問(wèn)題、中國(guó)古代天文學(xué)起源問(wèn)題、天文歷史年代學(xué)問(wèn)題。并分析了其主要結(jié)論:(1)中國(guó)上古天文之真實(shí)性不容置疑;(2)一味疑古之說(shuō)不可盡信;(3)中國(guó)天文學(xué)西來(lái)說(shuō)不可靠。
[Abstract]:The academic background and research route of Xinzang (1873-1938) were investigated. The astronomical almanac work in the History of Oriental Astronomy is studied in detail. There are three main fields involved in this study: the pre-Qin astronomical calendar, the origin of ancient Chinese astronomy, and the chronology of astronomical history. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the authenticity of ancient Chinese astronomy is indisputable; (2) the theory of skepticism cannot be fully believed; (3) the western part of Chinese astronomy is not reliable.
【作者單位】: 上海交通大學(xué)科學(xué)史與科學(xué)文化研究院;
【分類號(hào)】:P1-092
[Abstract]:The academic background and research route of Xinzang (1873-1938) were investigated. The astronomical almanac work in the History of Oriental Astronomy is studied in detail. There are three main fields involved in this study: the pre-Qin astronomical calendar, the origin of ancient Chinese astronomy, and the chronology of astronomical history. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the authenticity of ancient Chinese astronomy is indisputable; (2) the theory of skepticism cannot be fully believed; (3) the western part of Chinese astronomy is not reliable.
【作者單位】: 上海交通大學(xué)科學(xué)史與科學(xué)文化研究院;
【分類號(hào)】:P1-092
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 石之瑜;李圭之;曾倚萃;;日本近代中國(guó)學(xué):知識(shí)可否解放身份[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 王夏剛;曹德良;;抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期金毓黼東北史研究述論[J];大連近代史研究;2009年00期
2 趙薇;;“堯舜禹抹殺論”與白鳥庫(kù)吉的日本東洋史學(xué)[J];北方論叢;2013年01期
3 胡天舒;;內(nèi)藤湖南的中國(guó)觀——以《燕山楚水》為中心[J];歷史教學(xué)(下半月刊);2013年11期
4 齊s,
本文編號(hào):2284043
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/tianwen/2284043.html
最近更新
教材專著