天旋、歲差與中西之爭——清代科學(xué)思想史的一條線索
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-17 06:36
【摘要】：明清之際西方歲差的"恒星東移"解釋傳入中國,引爆了激烈的中西論爭。梅文鼎通過對歷算史的重構(gòu)將"恒星東移"納入中法范式,但分歧并未就此消弭。安清翹通過解構(gòu)西學(xué)、回歸中學(xué),將"恒星東移"從中學(xué)體系剔除出去,同時對"西學(xué)中源說"提出了系統(tǒng)性的批評。令人深思的是,梅文鼎倡導(dǎo)"西學(xué)中源說"是以默認(rèn)西學(xué)優(yōu)于中學(xué)為隱含前提,安清翹批評"西學(xué)中源說"則以否定西學(xué)優(yōu)于中學(xué)為預(yù)設(shè)基礎(chǔ),立論雖然不同,但目標(biāo)卻出奇的一致,即發(fā)揚(yáng)傳統(tǒng)以求超勝!就中學(xué)的維護(hù)和弘揚(yáng)而言,"西學(xué)中源"的解構(gòu)者安清翹甚至比倡導(dǎo)者梅文鼎更堅決、更徹底。歲差與中西之爭的表象之下,隱含著當(dāng)時受到西學(xué)影響而升華的中國傳統(tǒng)天旋模式之爭這一深刻背景。三者復(fù)雜糾纏、整體聯(lián)動,刻畫出有清一代科學(xué)思想史的一條清晰而重要的線索。
[Abstract]:During the Ming and Qing dynasties, the interpretation of the "Star eastward shift" of the Western precession was introduced into China, triggering a fierce debate between China and the West. Mei Wending brought the "star eastward shift" into the Sino-French paradigm through the reconstruction of the history of calendars, but the difference has not been resolved. By deconstructing the western theory and returning to the middle school, an Qingqiao removes the system of "moving the star eastward" from the middle school, and puts forward a systematic criticism of "the theory of the source of the western learning". What makes people think deeply is that Mei Wending advocated "the theory of the source of western learning" as the implicit premise that "the western learning is superior to the middle school", while an Qingqiao's criticism of "the theory of the source of the western learning" is based on the negation that the western learning is superior to the middle school, although the argument is different. But the goal is surprisingly consistent, that is, to carry forward the tradition in order to win! In terms of the maintenance and promotion of the middle school, the deconstructor of "the source of western learning", an Qingqiao, is even more resolute and thorough than Mei Wending, the advocate. Under the appearance of precession and the dispute between China and the West, there is a profound background of the dispute of the traditional Chinese celestial rotation mode which was sublimated by the western science at that time. The three complicated entanglement and the whole linkage depict a clear and important clue in the history of scientific thought in Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 東華大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金一般項目“安清翹科學(xué)思想脈絡(luò)與源流研究”(項目編號:14BZX031)
【分類號】：P1-09
本文編號：2129426
[Abstract]:During the Ming and Qing dynasties, the interpretation of the "Star eastward shift" of the Western precession was introduced into China, triggering a fierce debate between China and the West. Mei Wending brought the "star eastward shift" into the Sino-French paradigm through the reconstruction of the history of calendars, but the difference has not been resolved. By deconstructing the western theory and returning to the middle school, an Qingqiao removes the system of "moving the star eastward" from the middle school, and puts forward a systematic criticism of "the theory of the source of the western learning". What makes people think deeply is that Mei Wending advocated "the theory of the source of western learning" as the implicit premise that "the western learning is superior to the middle school", while an Qingqiao's criticism of "the theory of the source of the western learning" is based on the negation that the western learning is superior to the middle school, although the argument is different. But the goal is surprisingly consistent, that is, to carry forward the tradition in order to win! In terms of the maintenance and promotion of the middle school, the deconstructor of "the source of western learning", an Qingqiao, is even more resolute and thorough than Mei Wending, the advocate. Under the appearance of precession and the dispute between China and the West, there is a profound background of the dispute of the traditional Chinese celestial rotation mode which was sublimated by the western science at that time. The three complicated entanglement and the whole linkage depict a clear and important clue in the history of scientific thought in Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 東華大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金一般項目“安清翹科學(xué)思想脈絡(luò)與源流研究”(項目編號:14BZX031)
【分類號】：P1-09
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 賈爭卉;楊小明;;“矩”:一種獨特的世界觀——安清翹科學(xué)思想初探[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究;2011年02期
2 楊小明;賈爭卉;;“矩”哲學(xué)觀與安清翹關(guān)于中西學(xué)關(guān)系的認(rèn)知與實踐[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)研究;2013年04期
3 楊小明,李樹雪;安清翹關(guān)于歲差的認(rèn)識[J];中國科技史雜志;2005年03期
4 楊小明;黃勇;;日月五星左、右旋之爭:安清翹的左旋會通[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 黃勇;安清翹《推步惟是》解讀[D];山西大學(xué);2005年
，本文編號：2129426
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/tianwen/2129426.html
教材專著
