競(jìng)價(jià)排名中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題研究
[Abstract]:In the rapid development of network world, search engine has become an indispensable part of people's life. Search engines have greatly improved the convenience of our search materials by screening materials. The technology of bidding and ranking in search engine technology also causes more and more trademark infringement problems. Internet users can quickly obtain the information they need through search engines. This greatly increases the speed at which Internet users can obtain information. In order to find a new profit model for search engines, and for merchants to promote their products through the Internet, bidding and ranking techniques have emerged as a new form of online advertising. But the trademark infringement in this kind of network is different from the traditional trademark infringement, so it is necessary to analyze this form of trademark infringement systematically. The trademark infringement cases in the bidding ranking include search engine service providers, advertisers and trademark owners, and the types of infringement are very complex. Based on the relevant research at home and abroad, this study introduces the initial confusion, red flag rule and other theories to the theoretical analysis of trademark infringement in the bidding ranking, through the analysis of the advertisers should bear the direct tort liability. If the searcher fails to fulfill the reasonable duty of care, he should also bear the corresponding responsibility, but in the case of such trademark infringement, the search engine vendor subjectively has no intention of infringing, and does not apply joint tort to regulate it. The system of indirect infringement should be applied, and the search engine service provider should establish the trademark indirect infringement and bear the losses caused by its helping behavior. Finally, through the analysis of typical domestic cases, this paper finds out the legislative problems of trademark infringement in bidding ranking in China, and puts forward corresponding legal suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D923.43
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 侯霞;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中新型不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的法律規(guī)制[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
2 祝建軍;;競(jìng)價(jià)排名間接侵犯商標(biāo)權(quán)的認(rèn)定——以“百度”和“谷歌”案為例[J];法律適用;2010年01期
3 袁秀挺;胡宓;;搜索引擎商標(biāo)侵權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的認(rèn)定與責(zé)任承擔(dān)——網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)“第一案”評(píng)析[J];法學(xué);2009年04期
4 燕敏;;美國(guó)版權(quán)間接責(zé)任的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年21期
5 成夢(mèng)珊;;間接侵權(quán)理論在我國(guó)商標(biāo)侵權(quán)中的價(jià)值[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年32期
6 徐聰穎;;論“初始興趣混淆”的法律規(guī)制[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2010年03期
7 鄧宏光;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)廣告商標(biāo)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題初探[J];科技與法律;2009年06期
8 談旭;;競(jìng)價(jià)排名的廣告屬性與法律調(diào)整[J];齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期
9 李雨峰;;迷失的路——論搜索引擎服務(wù)商在商標(biāo)法上的注意義務(wù)[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2009年08期
10 李明偉;;論搜索引擎競(jìng)價(jià)排名的廣告屬性及其法律規(guī)范[J];新聞與傳播研究;2009年06期
本文編號(hào):2409592
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/sousuoyinqinglunwen/2409592.html