本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò) + 商標(biāo)侵權(quán)��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的廣泛普及和網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技的飛速發(fā)展，網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)行為也隨之增多，新問題的多發(fā)性使得法律在解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)問題時變得捉襟見肘。在司法實務(wù)中，法院認定此類問題時也標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一，存在司法上的混亂，使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者無法明確的預(yù)見自己的行為可能承擔(dān)的法律后果，既不利于對商標(biāo)權(quán)的合理保護，也不利于網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的正常經(jīng)營從而影響我國方興未艾的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)事業(yè)的發(fā)展，因此如何正確有效的利用法律手段對網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中商標(biāo)的侵權(quán)行為進行合理規(guī)范，從而更好的促進互聯(lián)網(wǎng)經(jīng)濟的蓬勃發(fā)展成為本文論述的出發(fā)點。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)具有很多新特點，其虛擬性、隱蔽性、多發(fā)性、以及損害后果的擴大性，都在很大程度上對商標(biāo)權(quán)人對其商標(biāo)的有效維護帶來了挑戰(zhàn)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商在傳統(tǒng)的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)行為中是否應(yīng)當(dāng)完全免除其責(zé)任，也開始成為學(xué)界討論的熱點，，從相關(guān)的訴訟案件中可以看出，司法實務(wù)中也逐漸認可了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商在一定條件下的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)責(zé)任，但是對其具體的認定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上存在差別。因此，應(yīng)當(dāng)在深思傳統(tǒng)的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)理論的基礎(chǔ)上，對其加以完善，引入商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)理論來有效的解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)問題。 第一章是對網(wǎng)絡(luò)商標(biāo)侵權(quán)和商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)理論的概述。介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)及其特點，以及本文所要論述的重點。同時對商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)理論作了比較完整的概述，包括商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)的概念、類型和制度發(fā)展，并進一步論述了我國引入商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)制度的必要性。 第二章介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下關(guān)于商標(biāo)的間接侵權(quán)的認定問題，主要是商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)的構(gòu)成要件和網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中商標(biāo)的合理使用。在商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)的構(gòu)成要件部分詳細介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商構(gòu)成間接侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則。 第三章是針對實踐中兩種典型的商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)主體，即搜索引擎服務(wù)商和網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商，一些具體問題所做的論述。介紹了兩者的概念，對理論界存在的熱點問題進行了探討，同時結(jié)合司法案例對于爭議焦點問題，提出了自己的一些看法。 第四章部分提出了完善我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)商標(biāo)保護的一些建議。在論述當(dāng)前理論不足以支撐司法實踐的基礎(chǔ)上，建議構(gòu)建我國的商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)制度，并在制度中針對特殊主體，例如網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商，制定商標(biāo)間接侵權(quán)的具體規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:With the wide popularization of the Internet and the rapid development of network technology in China, trademark infringement in the network environment is also increasing. The new problems make the law become overstretched in solving the trademark infringement problem in the network environment. In judicial practice, the courts also have different standards when determining such issues, and there is judicial confusion, which makes network service providers in the network environment unable to clearly foresee the legal consequences that their actions may bear. It is not conducive to the reasonable protection of trademark rights, nor to the normal operation of network service providers, thus affecting the development of the burgeoning Internet industry in China. Therefore, how to correctly and effectively use legal means to regulate the trademark infringement in the network environment is the starting point of this paper. Trademark infringement in the network environment has many new characteristics, its fictitious, hidden, multiple, and the expansion of damage consequences, to a large extent, the trademark owners to its trademark effective maintenance challenges. Whether Internet service providers should be completely exempted from liability in traditional trademark infringement acts has also become a hot topic in academic circles, which can be seen from related litigation cases. Judicial practice also gradually recognized the network service provider under certain conditions of trademark tort liability, but there are differences in its specific standards. Therefore, on the basis of thinking deeply about the traditional trademark infringement theory, we should perfect it and introduce the trademark indirect infringement theory to effectively solve the trademark infringement problem in the network environment. The first chapter is an overview of the network trademark infringement and trademark indirect infringement theory. This paper introduces the trademark infringement and its characteristics under the network environment, as well as the emphases to be discussed in this paper. At the same time, the author makes a relatively complete overview of the theory of indirect trademark infringement, including the concept, types and system development of indirect trademark infringement, and further discusses the necessity of introducing the system of indirect trademark infringement in China. The second chapter introduces the identification of the indirect trademark infringement under the network environment, mainly the constituent elements of the trademark indirect infringement and the rational use of the trademark in the network environment. In the part of the constituent elements of trademark indirect infringement, the principle of imputation of indirect infringement by internet service provider is introduced in detail. The third chapter deals with two typical subjects of trademark indirect infringement, namely search engine service provider and network trading platform provider. This paper introduces the concepts of the two concepts, probes into the hot issues existing in the theoretical circle, and puts forward some views on the focus of the dispute in the light of judicial cases. The fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the protection of network trademark in China. On the basis of discussing that the current theory is not enough to support judicial practice, it is suggested that the system of indirect trademark infringement should be constructed in China, and the specific rules of indirect infringement of trademark should be formulated in the system for special subjects, such as Internet service providers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.4

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭小莉;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年

本文編號：2051533