本文選題：認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué) + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言�。� 參考：《四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文在認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)視角下探究網(wǎng)絡(luò)構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”的層級(jí)性重命名認(rèn)知模型。該模型將始源域（正規(guī)的漢語(yǔ)表達(dá)）和目標(biāo)域（網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言表達(dá)）從音、形、義、用這四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行跨域映射，找出其聯(lián)系。我們認(rèn)為，該構(gòu)式的原型義是：網(wǎng)友們將表達(dá)式“A”賦予其具有網(wǎng)絡(luò)色彩的新表達(dá)“B”，以具有簡(jiǎn)潔、幽默、委婉、諷刺、贊揚(yáng)、批評(píng)等語(yǔ)用含義。 當(dāng)前語(yǔ)言學(xué)界對(duì)構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”并沒(méi)有詳細(xì)的論述和語(yǔ)料分析，同時(shí)現(xiàn)有語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論也不能很好地解釋該構(gòu)式。鑒于此，本文結(jié)合概念隱喻和理想化認(rèn)知模型的核心思想提出“層級(jí)性重命名模型”（簡(jiǎn)稱HRM, Hierarchical Renaming Model），且從國(guó)內(nèi)最大2個(gè)搜索引擎百度和谷歌中收集到238條語(yǔ)料，并運(yùn)用這一模型分析其句法、語(yǔ)義、語(yǔ)用特征。 本文首先從整體上對(duì)全文進(jìn)行介紹，包括選題動(dòng)機(jī)、研究意義、研究目的、數(shù)據(jù)收集、方法論及文章布局。然后，文章回顧了構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法理論、網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言及構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”的相關(guān)研究，分析其差異及研究不足。其次，針對(duì)以往研究之不足，，作者提出層級(jí)性重命名模型，并依據(jù)其理論框架分析構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”。再者，文章對(duì)封閉語(yǔ)料庫(kù)從音、形、義和用這4個(gè)方面來(lái)分類，分析其分布情況，還依次從句法，語(yǔ)義和語(yǔ)用這3個(gè)方面分析該構(gòu)式特征。研究表明該理論模型十分適用于分析該構(gòu)式。最后，文章對(duì)全文進(jìn)行總結(jié)，歸納三點(diǎn)貢獻(xiàn)： 1.構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”屬于特殊構(gòu)式，在語(yǔ)言學(xué)核心期刊尚未有相關(guān)討論。因此，本文嘗試從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)角度對(duì)其進(jìn)行探討，為該構(gòu)式的研究提供一個(gè)新穎的視角。 2.作者自建“層級(jí)性重命名模型”來(lái)解釋構(gòu)式“A不叫A，叫B”的重命名認(rèn)知過(guò)程，是一種嘗試性的創(chuàng)新。 3.本文還首次自建相對(duì)封閉語(yǔ)料庫(kù)來(lái)系統(tǒng)討論該構(gòu)式，使得論據(jù)更加充分。 最后指出文章之不足和缺陷，同時(shí)也為日后的研究提出些許個(gè)人建議。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, this paper explores the hierarchical renaming cognitive model of "A is not called A, called B" from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. In this model, the original domain (regular Chinese expression) and the target domain (network language expression) are mapped from the sound, shape and meaning to find out the relationship between the original domain and the target domain. We believe that the archetypal meaning of the construction is that the expression "A" is given by netizens to the new expression "B", which has a network color and has the pragmatic meaning of simplicity, humor, euphemism, satire, praise and criticism. At present, there is no detailed discussion and corpus analysis on the construction "A is not called A, called B" in the field of linguistics, and the existing linguistic theories can not explain the construction very well. In view of this, combining the core ideas of conceptual metaphor and idealized cognitive model, this paper puts forward the "hierarchical renaming Modeler" (HRM), and collects 238 corpus from Baidu and Google, the two largest search engines in China. This model is used to analyze the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic features. This paper first introduces the whole text, including the motivation, significance, purpose, data collection, methodology and layout. Then, this paper reviews the theory of construction grammar, network language and the related research of "A is not called A, called B", and analyzes its differences and deficiencies. Secondly, in view of the shortcomings of previous studies, the author proposes a hierarchical renaming model and analyzes the formula "A is not called A, called B" according to its theoretical framework. Furthermore, this paper classifies the closed corpus from four aspects: sound, form, meaning and use, and analyzes its distribution. It also analyzes the construction features from three aspects: syntax, semantics and pragmatics. The study shows that the theoretical model is very suitable for the analysis of the formula. Finally, the article summarizes the full text, and concludes three contributions: 1. The construction "A is not called A, called B" is a special construction, which has not been discussed in the core journals of linguistics. Therefore, this paper attempts to explore it from the perspective of cognitive linguistics, providing a novel perspective for the study of the construction. 2. The author established a hierarchical renaming model to explain the cognitive process of "A is not called A, called B", which is a tentative innovation. For the first time, a relative closed corpus is built to systematically discuss the construction, which makes the argument more sufficient. At last, it points out the deficiency and defect of the article, and puts forward some personal suggestions for the future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周有斌;“不是A,就是B”句表述對(duì)象的數(shù)量及作用[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 石毓智;;構(gòu)造語(yǔ)法理論關(guān)于construction定義問(wèn)題研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

3 M.Fried;Jan-Ola 銉stman;牛保義;;《構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法的跨語(yǔ)言研究》述評(píng)[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2006年04期

4 牛保義;;異中見同、同異互動(dòng)、求同存異—Fillmore & Kay的構(gòu)塊語(yǔ)法理論研究的哲學(xué)思考[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

5 王寅;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)之我見[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 嚴(yán)辰松;;構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法論要[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 王寅;;“As X As Y構(gòu)造”的認(rèn)知研究——十論語(yǔ)言的體驗(yàn)性[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

8 嚴(yán)辰松;;從“年方八十”說(shuō)起再談構(gòu)式[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

9 劉玉梅;;“吧”族詞形成的認(rèn)知機(jī)制研究[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

10 龍磊;;“X不是A,而是B”新構(gòu)式的認(rèn)知研究[J];西南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

本文編號(hào)：2040618