發(fā)布時間：2018-01-19 22:47

  本文關鍵詞： 網頁快照 著作權侵權 系統緩存避風港 默示許可 合理使用　出處：《復旦大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：“網頁快照”技術是在數字化背景下,搜索引擎行業(yè)為確保其技術優(yōu)勢、豐富其服務方式、提高互聯網用戶對網絡信息搜集的效率并且降低獲取信息成本的一項新技術。“網頁快照”的應用提高了互聯網用戶獲取信息的效率、豐富了用戶利用信息的途徑,從技術的角度來說,對信息在網絡環(huán)境傳播起到了促進作用。但是從著作權法角度來說,互聯網海量的信息中有相當一部分是屬于享有著作權的數字化作品,“網頁快照”技術在自動運行的過程中,直接侵害了這些數字化作品的著作權人的專有權利。對待“網頁快照”這一本該中立的新技術的合法性,在國內外理論界和司法實務界都存在著很大的爭議。 在美國與網頁快照有關的判例"Field訴Google"案中,確立了“系統緩存避風港”、“默示許可制度”和“合理使用制度”等網頁快照的主要侵權抗辯以及免責事由。本文討論之重點在于網頁快照是否符合這些抗辯和免責事由的適用條件,以及對于諸如“網頁快照”等新技術的對著作權制度的沖擊,我國著作權法應當如何完善以應對挑戰(zhàn)。 本文一共分為引言和四個章節(jié)。 引言介紹了網頁快照產生的技術背景和中美關于“網頁快照”的一些司法判例,從不同的判決結果中引出本文所要討論的主題。 第一章從網頁快照的技術運行背景入手概括了網頁快照的特征和技術效果,同時通過與傳統搜索引擎服務的技術對比,明確了網頁快照在我國著作權法中的定性； 第二章在認定網頁屬于著作權法保護的客體的前提下,認為“網頁快照”技術中復制、存儲、傳播行為構成對權利人復制權、信息網絡傳播權等著作權專有權利的侵害； 第三章探討“系統緩存避風港”、“默示許可制度”以及“合理使用制度”等著作權的侵權抗辯以及免責事由在網頁快照中的適用,認為快照不適用“系統緩存避風港”、“默示許可制度”,可以分情況適用“合理使用制度”對其合法性進行分析； 第四章提出網頁快照行為的處理原則與我國著作權法合理使用制度的完善。在網絡環(huán)境下,應將“三步檢驗標準”的法律地位確定為合理使用一般性判斷標準,將其作為一個開放式的原則與著作權法第22條中合理使用行為的列舉式立法結合,在涉及諸如“網頁快照”等新技術合法性的判斷中,給法官預留靈活的自由裁量的空間,這樣才能更好平衡著作權人利益與信息技術發(fā)展和公共知識新技術傳播。
[Abstract]:"Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the digital background, the search engine industry to ensure its technical advantages, enrich its service. A new technology to improve the efficiency of Internet users to collect network information and reduce the cost of obtaining information. The application of "Web Page Snapshot" improves the efficiency of Internet users to obtain information. It enriches the ways for users to use information, and promotes the dissemination of information in the network environment from the technical point of view, but from the perspective of copyright law. A considerable part of the massive information on the Internet belongs to the digital works that enjoy copyright. "Web Page Snapshot" technology is in the process of automatic operation. Direct infringement of the exclusive rights of copyright owners of these digital works. Treatment of "Web Snapshots" The legitimacy of this new technology, which was supposed to be neutral, has been controversial both in theory and judicial practice at home and abroad. In the case of Field v. Google, the United States case relating to web page snapshots, a "safe haven for system caching" was established. "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" and other webpage snapshots of the main tort defences and exemptions. The focus of this discussion is whether the web snapshot meets the applicable conditions of these defences and exemptions. As well as the impact of new technologies such as "web snapshot" on the copyright system, how should China's copyright law be perfected to meet the challenge? This article is divided into introduction and four chapters. The introduction introduces the technical background of web page snapshot and some judicial precedents about "web page snapshot" in China and the United States, and draws the theme of this article from different judgment results. The first chapter summarizes the characteristics and technical effects of web snapshot from the background of the technology operation of web snapshot, and compares with the traditional search engine service technology at the same time. The definition of web page snapshot in the copyright law of our country is clarified. In the second chapter, on the premise that the web page belongs to the object protected by copyright law, the author thinks that the reproduction, storage and dissemination behavior in the technology of "web page snapshot" constitute the right to copy to the obligee. Infringement of exclusive rights of copyright, such as the right of information network dissemination; The third chapter discusses the application of copyright infringement defences such as "system cache safe haven", "implied license system" and "reasonable use system" in the web page snapshot. The author thinks that snapshot is not suitable for "system cache safe haven", "implied license system", and can be applied to "reasonable use system" to analyze its legitimacy. Chapter 4th puts forward the handling principle of web page snapshot and the perfection of the reasonable use system of copyright law in our country. The legal status of the "three-step test standard" should be determined as the general judgment standard of rational use, which should be combined as an open principle with the enumerative legislation of the rational use behavior in Article 22 of the copyright Law. In judgments involving the legitimacy of new technologies such as "web snapshots," judges are given room for flexible discretion. Only in this way can the interests of copyright owners be balanced with the development of information technology and the dissemination of new technology of public knowledge.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 呂炳斌;;數字時代版權保護理念的重構——從以復制權為中心到以傳播權為中心[J];北方法學;2007年06期

2 王遷;;網絡環(huán)境中版權直接侵權的認定[J];東方法學;2009年02期

3 王遷;;搜索引擎提供“快照”服務的著作權侵權問題研究[J];東方法學;2010年03期

4 胡開忠;許福忠;陳大林;;我國權利管理電子信息制度的立法設計[J];廈門大學法律評論;2005年02期

5 趙莉;質疑網絡版權中“默示許可”的法律地位[J];電子知識產權;2003年12期

6 李秋容;個體利益與公共利益的博弈與平衡——關于知識產權制度的法理與實證分析[J];電子知識產權;2004年07期

7 朱理;;臨時復制是否屬于著作權法意義上的復制——以國際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識產權;2007年01期

8 王遷;;發(fā)達國家網絡版權司法保護的現狀與趨勢[J];法律適用;2009年12期

9 張今;陳倩婷;;論著作權默示許可使用的立法實踐[J];法學雜志;2012年02期

10 王遷;;論版權“間接侵權”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學;2005年12期

，

本文編號：1445802