【摘要】：通過(guò)構(gòu)建水貧困評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,運(yùn)用水匱乏指數(shù)(WPI)模型對(duì)西北干旱半干旱區(qū)2010—2014年水貧困狀況進(jìn)行測(cè)度,并進(jìn)一步運(yùn)用LSE模型對(duì)水貧困的驅(qū)動(dòng)因素進(jìn)行分析。結(jié)果表明,2010—2014年西北干旱半干旱區(qū)水貧困程度加重,水貧困呈明顯的省、區(qū)分異特征,即甘肅省和寧夏回族自治區(qū)最為嚴(yán)重,其次是新疆維吾爾自治區(qū),內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)的水貧困程度相對(duì)最弱;西北干旱半干旱區(qū)的水貧困空間驅(qū)動(dòng)類(lèi)型為"資源-設(shè)施-能力-使用-環(huán)境"5因素聯(lián)合型,不同地區(qū)因水資源稟賦、設(shè)施建設(shè)等差異,水貧困驅(qū)動(dòng)因素有所不同。
[Abstract]:By constructing the evaluation index system of water poverty, using the water scarcity index (WPI) model to measure the water poverty from 2010 to 2014 in arid and semi-arid region of Northwest China, and further analyzing the driving factors of water poverty by using LSE model. The results show that the degree of water poverty in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China increased from 2010 to 2014, and the water poverty was obvious in different provinces, that is, Gansu Province and Ningxia Hui Autonomous region were the most serious, followed by Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region. The degree of water poverty in Inner Mongolia Autonomous region is the weakest, and the spatial driving type of water poverty in arid and semi-arid region of northwest China is "resource-facility, capability, use-environment" combination type. The drivers of water poverty differ.
【作者單位】： 新疆生產(chǎn)建設(shè)兵團(tuán)屯墾經(jīng)濟(jì)研究中心;石河子大學(xué)農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(編號(hào):71563040) 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)普通高校人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):XJEDU020215C05)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TV213.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李剛,孟遂民,秦紅玲;基于熵權(quán)的料場(chǎng)方案模糊多屬性?xún)?yōu)選研究[J];水力發(fā)電;2005年04期

2 楊國(guó)華;崔彬;;熵權(quán)法在水資源可持續(xù)利用評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];數(shù)學(xué)的實(shí)踐與認(rèn)識(shí);2011年19期

3 黃曼麗;朱凌;尹華;祝承義;;基于熵權(quán)的多目標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法在水利工程中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村水利水電;2008年12期

4 湯m，

本文編號(hào)：2284372