燈泡貫流式水電站廠房流固耦合動力特性研究
[Abstract]:Bulb tubular hydropower station is generally river bed type, which is the most suitable way to develop low head hydraulic resources. Because of its high hydraulic efficiency, larger unit flow rate and higher unit rotational speed, small amount of civil engineering and quick investment, etc. It has been widely used in practical engineering at home and abroad. The power house of bulb tubular hydropower station is mostly a water-retaining powerhouse, which itself is a part of the water retaining structure of the hub, and the size of the runner of the unit is huge. The interaction between water and structure has a great influence on the structural characteristics of the powerhouse. During the operation of hydropower station, the dynamic characteristics of powerhouse structure under the action of seismic load and pulsating pressure have been the focus of attention. Therefore, this paper chooses to study the structure of a practical bulb tubular hydropower station powerhouse, based on fluid-solid coupling analysis of the impact of water on the natural vibration characteristics of the structure and seismic response, etc. The dynamic response of the structure under pulsating pressure is calculated. The main contents of this paper are as follows: (1) the fluid-solid coupling three-dimensional finite element model considering powerhouse structure, foundation and water body is established to study the influence of water body on the natural vibration characteristics of powerhouse structure. The results show that the frequency values of the powerhouse structure are reduced by water, and the frequencies calculated by the additional mass method considering the interaction of water body are slightly smaller than those calculated by the fluid-solid coupling method, and the vibration modes of each order are also changed. The effect of water body should be taken into account in the resonance checking of powerhouse structure, but there is no difference between the additional mass method and fluid-structure coupling method. (2) the hydrodynamic pressure distribution of unit runner structure during earthquake is obtained by considering the water body in fluid-solid coupling mode. It is found that the hydrodynamic pressure in the upstream channel is greater than that in the downstream draft pipe. Comparing the seismic response of the powerhouse structure under the three schemes without considering the water body, the additional mass method and the fluid-solid coupling method, it is found that the effect of water body on the dynamic response of most areas of the powerhouse structure is mainly increased. On the whole, the increase of the additional mass method is larger than that of the fluid-solid coupling method, which is obvious in the displacement and stress response, but not obvious in the velocity and acceleration response. The influence of water on structural velocity and acceleration response is more complex, so the water body action should be considered reasonably in seismic analysis of powerhouse structure. (3) the distribution law of fluctuating pressure of runner obtained by CFD calculation of hydraulic turbine runner is analyzed. The pulsating pressure field of the whole channel is accurately simulated by the pulsating pressure at various measuring points of several sections. The difference of vibration response of the powerhouse under different unit output conditions with different design head is studied by time-process method. The results show that with the decrease of generating force, the pulsating pressure of the runner increases, and the vibration displacement, velocity and acceleration of the powerhouse also increase, but each response value is less than the suggested value of the vibration standard of the powerhouse. The frequency of runner blade is the main frequency that causes the vibration of the powerhouse. (4) combined with the distribution of pulsating pressure in the channel, the harmonic response method is used to load the runner in different zones, and the difference between the response and the time-history method under the maximum output condition is compared. The results show that the root mean square (RMS) values of each response obtained by the harmonic response method are larger than those obtained by the time-history method. The pulsating pressure between the guide vane and the runner and the draft tube area plays an important role in the vibration response of the auxiliary workshop floor.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:TV731
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 梁永樹;徐藝恩;;燈泡貫流水輪機(jī)振動的處理措施[J];廣東水利水電;2016年10期
2 蘇晨輝;宋志強(qiáng);耿聃;;水電站地面廠房地震響應(yīng)分析研究綜述[J];南水北調(diào)與水利科技;2016年05期
3 尚銀磊;李德玉;歐陽金惠;;大型水電站廠房振動問題研究綜述[J];中國水利水電科學(xué)研究院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期
4 孫偉;何蘊(yùn)龍;苗君;喻虎圻;李巍;熊X;;水體對河床式水電站廠房動力特性和地震動力響應(yīng)的影響分析[J];水力發(fā)電學(xué)報(bào);2015年09期
5 李守義;呂汶蔚;;河床式水電站廠房結(jié)構(gòu)流固耦合振動特性研究[J];水資源與水工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期
6 喻虎圻;何蘊(yùn)龍;曹學(xué)興;孫偉;李巍;;基于粘彈性邊界的河床式廠房地震動力響應(yīng)分析[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(工學(xué)版);2015年01期
7 錢忠東;魏巍;馮曉波;;燈泡貫流式水輪機(jī)全流道壓力脈動數(shù)值模擬[J];水力發(fā)電學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期
8 劉建;伍鶴皋;;脈動壓力諧響應(yīng)和時程分析的差異性研究[J];長江科學(xué)院院報(bào);2014年08期
9 練繼建;張煈;劉f ;余曉華;;廠頂溢流式水電站振源特性研究[J];振動與沖擊;2013年18期
10 李海亮;嚴(yán)錦麗;王旭峰;;基于ANSYS的水輪機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)輪流固耦合分析[J];機(jī)電工程;2013年09期
,本文編號:2249866
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2249866.html