【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的高速增長(zhǎng)，我國(guó)地區(qū)、城鄉(xiāng)、行業(yè)、群體間的收入差距繼續(xù)擴(kuò)大，出現(xiàn)了嚴(yán)重的貧富差距現(xiàn)象；伴隨著這種狀況的是社會(huì)階層的分異和公共服務(wù)享有的異化，，因此基本公共服務(wù)均等化成為現(xiàn)階段的訴求。在休閑大眾化的時(shí)代，休閑已經(jīng)成為居民日常生活不可或缺的組成部分，那么，城市公共休閑空間的布局是否公正、公平呢？是不是每個(gè)人都能均等地享有基本公共休閑空間服務(wù)呢？ 本文以泉州市為例，從市級(jí)、區(qū)級(jí)和社區(qū)級(jí)三個(gè)級(jí)別對(duì)泉州市鯉城區(qū)和豐澤區(qū)的公共休閑空間進(jìn)行分析。首先，對(duì)研究范圍內(nèi)市級(jí)和區(qū)級(jí)的公園綠地、休閑廣場(chǎng)運(yùn)用地理網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析其服務(wù)面積和服務(wù)人口，找出其未被覆蓋的地區(qū)和人口比例，考察其地理分布的合理性和公平性；對(duì)市級(jí)、區(qū)級(jí)公共休閑場(chǎng)館的分布采用Arcgis中的可達(dá)性分析，做出可達(dá)性等級(jí)圖，并結(jié)合克里格插值法生成的房?jī)r(jià)圖進(jìn)行疊置分析，研究房?jī)r(jià)與可達(dá)性之間的關(guān)系，以考量公共休閑場(chǎng)館的可達(dá)性與經(jīng)濟(jì)收入之間的關(guān)系。其次，從社區(qū)級(jí)來(lái)研究，選取了四個(gè)樣本社區(qū)，對(duì)樣本社區(qū)的休閑場(chǎng)所進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)，并采用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查和深度訪談的方式，分析居民的休閑方式、休閑場(chǎng)所、休閑制約、休閑期望、休閑意識(shí)和對(duì)本社區(qū)休閑空間的滿意度，以考察社區(qū)休閑空間是否存在異化的現(xiàn)象。 研究結(jié)果表明泉州市研究范圍內(nèi)的城市休閑空間呈現(xiàn)分布并不公平現(xiàn)象，有34.5%的人口在公園和休閑廣場(chǎng)的服務(wù)范圍之外，社區(qū)休閑空間也出現(xiàn)異化的現(xiàn)象，表現(xiàn)為不同社區(qū)的休閑場(chǎng)所和設(shè)施配置參差不齊。 文章最后部分從發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)、協(xié)調(diào)休閑空間規(guī)劃和城市發(fā)展、強(qiáng)化政府主導(dǎo)和監(jiān)管行為、鼓勵(lì)社會(huì)參與和增強(qiáng)居民休閑意識(shí)等幾個(gè)方面對(duì)泉州市的休閑空間布局提出了優(yōu)化對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:With the rapid economic growth, the income gap between the regions, urban and rural areas, industries and groups continues to expand, resulting in a serious gap between the rich and the poor. This situation is accompanied by the differentiation of social strata and the alienation of public service, so the equalization of basic public services becomes the demand at the present stage. In the age of popular leisure, leisure has become an indispensable part of the daily life of residents, so whether the layout of urban public leisure space is fair and equitable? Does everyone have equal access to basic public leisure space services? Taking Quanzhou city as an example, this paper analyzes the public leisure space in the leicheng district and Fengze district of Quanzhou City from the three levels of city level, district level and community level. First of all, on the city and district level park green space, leisure square uses the geographical network to analyze its service area and service population, find out its uncovered area and the proportion of population, investigate the rationality and fairness of its geographical distribution; For the distribution of public leisure venues at the municipal and district levels, the reachability analysis of Arcgis is used to make the reachability level map, and the overlay analysis of the house price map generated by Kriging interpolation is carried out to study the relationship between house price and reachability. To consider the relationship between the accessibility of public leisure venues and economic income. Secondly, from the community level to study, selected four sample communities, the sample community of leisure place statistics, and the use of questionnaires and in-depth interviews to analyze the residents' leisure mode, leisure place, leisure constraints, leisure expectations, Leisure consciousness and satisfaction degree to the community leisure space, in order to investigate whether there exists alienation phenomenon in the community leisure space. The results show that the distribution of urban leisure space in Quanzhou City is unfair. 34.5% of the population is outside the service range of parks and leisure squares, and the community leisure space is also dissimilated. The leisure places and facilities in different communities are mixed. In the last part of the article, the author puts forward some countermeasures to optimize the layout of leisure space in Quanzhou from the following aspects: developing economy, coordinating leisure space planning and urban development, strengthening government leading and supervising behavior, encouraging social participation and enhancing residents' leisure consciousness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU984.113

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳雯;王遠(yuǎn)飛;;城市公園區(qū)位分配公平性評(píng)價(jià)研究——以上海市外環(huán)線以內(nèi)區(qū)域?yàn)槔齕J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年04期

2 李博;宋云;俞孔堅(jiān);;城市公園綠地規(guī)劃中的可達(dá)性指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年04期

3 張中華;;地方理論在城市休閑空間研究中的應(yīng)用[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2012年03期

4 江海燕;周春山;肖榮波;;廣州公園綠地的空間差異及社會(huì)公平研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2010年04期

5 顧鳴東;尹海偉;;公共設(shè)施空間可達(dá)性與公平性研究概述[J];城市問(wèn)題;2010年05期

6 林耿;王煉軍;;全球化背景下酒吧的地方性與空間性——以廣州為例[J];地理科學(xué);2011年07期

7 陳志鋼;保繼剛;;典型旅游城市游憩商業(yè)區(qū)空間形態(tài)演變及影響機(jī)制——以廣西陽(yáng)朔縣為例[J];地理研究;2012年07期

8 肖華斌;袁奇峰;徐會(huì)軍;;基于可達(dá)性和服務(wù)面積的公園綠地空間分布研究[J];規(guī)劃師;2009年02期

9 呂勤;王萍;;大學(xué)生休閑行為和休閑動(dòng)機(jī)研究——兼對(duì)大學(xué)生休閑市場(chǎng)的預(yù)測(cè)[J];北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年07期

10 譚少華;趙萬(wàn)民;;城市公園綠地社會(huì)功能研究[J];重慶建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

本文編號(hào)：2362007