【摘要】：地震是全球造成人員傷亡和財產損失最大的自然災害，目前的科技水平還不能對地震的發(fā)生進行準確的預測，也沒有有效的措施可以防止地震的發(fā)生。減輕地震災害根本途徑是對工程進行合理的抗震設計，抗震規(guī)范是工程抗震設計的主要依據(jù)。中美歐都是全球地震頻發(fā)的國家和地區(qū)，但由于美國和歐洲抗震規(guī)范較為完善，抗震設計方法較為合理，歷次大地震造成的人員傷亡和財產損失均遠低于我國。因此，本文系統(tǒng)對比中美歐抗震規(guī)范，指出中國規(guī)范抗震設計與美歐規(guī)范的差異，為我國的抗震研究和抗震設計提供參考，促進我國抗震規(guī)范的進一步完善，與國際抗震規(guī)范接軌。論文的主要工作和研究成果如下： （1）從抗震設防水準目標、抗震設計方法、場地類別、地震區(qū)劃、抗震設計反應譜、重要性類別、重力荷載取值等方面對比中美歐規(guī)范的抗震設計基本規(guī)定，分析中美歐規(guī)范抗震設防思想和設計方法的的差異，并建立各規(guī)范在場地類別、地震動參數(shù)、重要性類別等方面的對應關系。 （2）對比中美歐規(guī)范的底部剪力法和振型分解反應譜法的計算理論和計算方法，，并以具體的鋼筋混凝土框架結構為例，通過底部剪力法和振型分解反應譜法計算其地震作用，直觀比較中美歐規(guī)范地震作用。 （3）從內力調整和構造措施兩個方面對比中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結構抗震措施，比較中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結構的延性等級。 （4）分別按照中美歐規(guī)范的相關規(guī)定完成某鋼筋混凝土框架結構的抗震設計，直觀對比中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結構的抗震設計結果。
[Abstract]:Earthquake is a natural disaster that causes the greatest casualties and property losses in the world. At present, the level of science and technology can not accurately predict the occurrence of earthquakes, and there are no effective measures to prevent the occurrence of earthquakes. The basic way to reduce earthquake disaster is to carry on the reasonable seismic design to the project, and the seismic code is the main basis of the seismic design of the project. China, the United States and Europe are the countries and regions with frequent earthquakes, but because of the perfect seismic code and the reasonable seismic design method in the United States and Europe, the casualties and property losses caused by the previous major earthquakes are far lower than those in China. Therefore, this paper systematically compares China, America and Europe seismic code, points out the difference between Chinese code and American and European code, provides reference for our country's seismic research and seismic design, and promotes the further improvement of our country's seismic code. In line with the international seismic code. The main work and research results are as follows: (1) from the seismic fortification level objectives, seismic design methods, site categories, seismic zoning, seismic design response spectrum, importance categories, Comparing with the basic rules of seismic design of the code of China, America and Europe, the difference of the seismic fortification thought and design method of the code of China, America and Europe are analyzed, and the parameters of ground motion of each code in the site category are established. The corresponding relation of importance category and so on. (2) comparing the calculation theory and calculation method of the bottom shear force method and the mode decomposition response spectrum method, and taking the concrete reinforced concrete frame structure as an example, the seismic action is calculated by the bottom shear force method and the mode decomposition response spectrum method. A direct comparison between China, the United States and the European normative earthquake action. (3) comparing the seismic measures of reinforced concrete frame structure between China, America and Europe, and comparing the ductility grade of reinforced concrete frame structure in the code of China, America and Europe from the aspects of internal force adjustment and construction measure. (4) the aseismic design of a reinforced concrete frame structure is completed according to the relevant regulations of the Central American and European codes, and the seismic design results of the reinforced concrete frame structure in the code of China, America and Europe are compared intuitively.
【學位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU375.4;TU352.11

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 謝禮立,周雍年,胡成祥,于海英;地震動反應譜的長周期特性[J];地震工程與工程振動;1990年01期

2 李小軍,彭青;不同類別場地地震動參數(shù)的計算分析[J];地震工程與工程振動;2001年01期

3 周雍年,周正華,于海英;設計反應譜長周期區(qū)段的研究[J];地震工程與工程振動;2004年02期

4 趙艷;郭明珠;吳煥娟;張皎;;關于改進我國抗震設計反應譜的探討[J];地震工程與工程振動;2006年03期

5 車軼;尤杰;;中歐抗震設計規(guī)范關于“強柱弱梁”設計比較[J];大連理工大學學報;2009年05期

6 黃雅虹;呂悅軍;蘭景巖;施春花;史丙新;;工程場地分類中等效剪切波速計算深度問題的討論[J];地震地質;2010年02期

7 高孟潭;新的國家地震區(qū)劃圖[J];地震學報;2003年06期

8 陳國興;中國建筑抗震設計規(guī)范的演變與展望[J];防災減災工程學報;2003年01期

9 宋曉勝;佘念山;;中美規(guī)范中提高鋼筋混凝土柱延性構造措施的比較[J];福建建設科技;2008年04期

10 陸文超;張俊海;;國內外抗震設防目標的分析[J];工程建設與設計;2007年11期

本文編號：2327561