【摘要】：地震是全球造成人員傷亡和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失最大的自然災(zāi)害，目前的科技水平還不能對(duì)地震的發(fā)生進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確的預(yù)測(cè)，也沒(méi)有有效的措施可以防止地震的發(fā)生。減輕地震災(zāi)害根本途徑是對(duì)工程進(jìn)行合理的抗震設(shè)計(jì)，抗震規(guī)范是工程抗震設(shè)計(jì)的主要依據(jù)。中美歐都是全球地震頻發(fā)的國(guó)家和地區(qū)，但由于美國(guó)和歐洲抗震規(guī)范較為完善，抗震設(shè)計(jì)方法較為合理，歷次大地震造成的人員傷亡和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失均遠(yuǎn)低于我國(guó)。因此，本文系統(tǒng)對(duì)比中美歐抗震規(guī)范，指出中國(guó)規(guī)范抗震設(shè)計(jì)與美歐規(guī)范的差異，為我國(guó)的抗震研究和抗震設(shè)計(jì)提供參考，促進(jìn)我國(guó)抗震規(guī)范的進(jìn)一步完善，與國(guó)際抗震規(guī)范接軌。論文的主要工作和研究成果如下： （1）從抗震設(shè)防水準(zhǔn)目標(biāo)、抗震設(shè)計(jì)方法、場(chǎng)地類(lèi)別、地震區(qū)劃、抗震設(shè)計(jì)反應(yīng)譜、重要性類(lèi)別、重力荷載取值等方面對(duì)比中美歐規(guī)范的抗震設(shè)計(jì)基本規(guī)定，分析中美歐規(guī)范抗震設(shè)防思想和設(shè)計(jì)方法的的差異，并建立各規(guī)范在場(chǎng)地類(lèi)別、地震動(dòng)參數(shù)、重要性類(lèi)別等方面的對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系。 （2）對(duì)比中美歐規(guī)范的底部剪力法和振型分解反應(yīng)譜法的計(jì)算理論和計(jì)算方法，，并以具體的鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)為例，通過(guò)底部剪力法和振型分解反應(yīng)譜法計(jì)算其地震作用，直觀比較中美歐規(guī)范地震作用。 （3）從內(nèi)力調(diào)整和構(gòu)造措施兩個(gè)方面對(duì)比中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)抗震措施，比較中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)的延性等級(jí)。 （4）分別按照中美歐規(guī)范的相關(guān)規(guī)定完成某鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)的抗震設(shè)計(jì)，直觀對(duì)比中美歐規(guī)范鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)的抗震設(shè)計(jì)結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Earthquake is a natural disaster that causes the greatest casualties and property losses in the world. At present, the level of science and technology can not accurately predict the occurrence of earthquakes, and there are no effective measures to prevent the occurrence of earthquakes. The basic way to reduce earthquake disaster is to carry on the reasonable seismic design to the project, and the seismic code is the main basis of the seismic design of the project. China, the United States and Europe are the countries and regions with frequent earthquakes, but because of the perfect seismic code and the reasonable seismic design method in the United States and Europe, the casualties and property losses caused by the previous major earthquakes are far lower than those in China. Therefore, this paper systematically compares China, America and Europe seismic code, points out the difference between Chinese code and American and European code, provides reference for our country's seismic research and seismic design, and promotes the further improvement of our country's seismic code. In line with the international seismic code. The main work and research results are as follows: (1) from the seismic fortification level objectives, seismic design methods, site categories, seismic zoning, seismic design response spectrum, importance categories, Comparing with the basic rules of seismic design of the code of China, America and Europe, the difference of the seismic fortification thought and design method of the code of China, America and Europe are analyzed, and the parameters of ground motion of each code in the site category are established. The corresponding relation of importance category and so on. (2) comparing the calculation theory and calculation method of the bottom shear force method and the mode decomposition response spectrum method, and taking the concrete reinforced concrete frame structure as an example, the seismic action is calculated by the bottom shear force method and the mode decomposition response spectrum method. A direct comparison between China, the United States and the European normative earthquake action. (3) comparing the seismic measures of reinforced concrete frame structure between China, America and Europe, and comparing the ductility grade of reinforced concrete frame structure in the code of China, America and Europe from the aspects of internal force adjustment and construction measure. (4) the aseismic design of a reinforced concrete frame structure is completed according to the relevant regulations of the Central American and European codes, and the seismic design results of the reinforced concrete frame structure in the code of China, America and Europe are compared intuitively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU375.4;TU352.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝禮立,周雍年,胡成祥,于海英;地震動(dòng)反應(yīng)譜的長(zhǎng)周期特性[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);1990年01期

2 李小軍,彭青;不同類(lèi)別場(chǎng)地地震動(dòng)參數(shù)的計(jì)算分析[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);2001年01期

3 周雍年,周正華,于海英;設(shè)計(jì)反應(yīng)譜長(zhǎng)周期區(qū)段的研究[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);2004年02期

4 趙艷;郭明珠;吳煥娟;張皎;;關(guān)于改進(jìn)我國(guó)抗震設(shè)計(jì)反應(yīng)譜的探討[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);2006年03期

5 車(chē)軼;尤杰;;中歐抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范關(guān)于“強(qiáng)柱弱梁”設(shè)計(jì)比較[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

6 黃雅虹;呂悅軍;蘭景巖;施春花;史丙新;;工程場(chǎng)地分類(lèi)中等效剪切波速計(jì)算深度問(wèn)題的討論[J];地震地質(zhì);2010年02期

7 高孟潭;新的國(guó)家地震區(qū)劃圖[J];地震學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

8 陳國(guó)興;中國(guó)建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范的演變與展望[J];防災(zāi)減災(zāi)工程學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

9 宋曉勝;佘念山;;中美規(guī)范中提高鋼筋混凝土柱延性構(gòu)造措施的比較[J];福建建設(shè)科技;2008年04期

10 陸文超;張俊海;;國(guó)內(nèi)外抗震設(shè)防目標(biāo)的分析[J];工程建設(shè)與設(shè)計(jì);2007年11期

本文編號(hào)：2327561