新型密肋空心樓蓋結(jié)構(gòu)選型研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-17 12:47
【摘要】:隨著我國(guó)建筑業(yè)的發(fā)展,密肋空心樓蓋結(jié)構(gòu)得到了廣泛的應(yīng)用。為滿(mǎn)足現(xiàn)代建筑對(duì)自重輕、空間大和層高矮的限制、間隔自由及抗震性能好等要求,單一的樓蓋體系已經(jīng)不能滿(mǎn)足需要,各種新型的樓蓋體系應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。樓蓋的選型和布置不但關(guān)系到結(jié)構(gòu)受力的好壞,,而且對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)的正常使用、造價(jià)高低以及室內(nèi)景觀效果和施工便利等因素有著重大的關(guān)系。而針對(duì)不同的工程項(xiàng)目如何選取合適的樓蓋結(jié)構(gòu),選取什么樣的樓蓋結(jié)構(gòu)才能既提高工效又經(jīng)濟(jì)合理,成為一個(gè)迫切需要解決的問(wèn)題。 本文主要針對(duì)新型密肋空心樓蓋中的蜂巢芯樓蓋、薄壁方箱樓蓋、疊合箱樓蓋、BM棚膜密肋樓蓋進(jìn)行分析研究,并與普通梁板樓蓋、井字梁樓蓋、傳統(tǒng)密肋樓蓋進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,主要研究技術(shù)內(nèi)容有:(1)對(duì)研究的各種樓蓋的結(jié)構(gòu)性能進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析;(2)對(duì)各種樓蓋的施工工藝進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,闡述各種樓蓋的施工難點(diǎn)及質(zhì)量控制要點(diǎn);(3)結(jié)合工程實(shí)例對(duì)各種樓蓋的工程造價(jià)及施工工效進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析;(4)對(duì)各種樓蓋的綜合效益進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,最終找出新型密肋空心樓蓋的合理適用范圍。 通過(guò)本文的研究得出以下結(jié)論:(1)現(xiàn)澆混凝土新型密肋空心樓蓋適應(yīng)于大跨度、大荷載的結(jié)構(gòu)體系,尤其適應(yīng)于跨度大于7.8米、地下水位高、地基堅(jiān)硬、覆土厚度大的地下結(jié)構(gòu)。(2)現(xiàn)澆混凝土空心樓蓋雖然現(xiàn)在應(yīng)用較為廣泛,但發(fā)展受到內(nèi)部模具的限制。因此,研制高強(qiáng)、輕質(zhì)、價(jià)格低廉、工廠(chǎng)化加工程度高、質(zhì)優(yōu)的內(nèi)部模具是重中之重。(3)按照相應(yīng)子目套用現(xiàn)有定額計(jì)價(jià),基本能滿(mǎn)足現(xiàn)有材料消耗和市場(chǎng)價(jià)要求,但需相應(yīng)補(bǔ)充部分定額條目。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's construction industry, multi-ribbed hollow floor structure has been widely used. In order to meet the requirements of modern buildings, such as light weight, large space and short height, free spacing and good seismic performance, a single floor system has been unable to meet the needs, and a variety of new floor systems emerged as the times require. The selection and arrangement of floor is not only related to the strength of the structure, but also to the normal use of the structure, the level of cost, the indoor landscape effect and the convenience of construction and other factors. It is an urgent problem that how to select the appropriate floor structure and what kind of floor structure can improve the efficiency and economy of different projects. In this paper, the honeycomb core floor, thin-walled box floor, laminated box floor, and BM roof are analyzed and compared with the conventional beam slab floor, the well beam floor and the traditional multi-ribbed floor, which are mainly used for the analysis of the honeycomb core floor, thin-walled box floor, superimposed box floor and BM roof in the new type of multi-ribbed hollow floor. The main contents of this paper are as follows: (1) comparative analysis of the structural performance of various floor structures, (2) comparative analysis of construction techniques of various floor structures, and elaboration of construction difficulties and key points of quality control of various floors; (3) comparing and analyzing the engineering cost and construction efficiency of various floor floors in combination with engineering examples; (4) comparing and analyzing the comprehensive benefits of various floor floors, and finally finding out the reasonable scope of application of the new type of multi-ribbed hollow floor. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) A new type of cast-in-place concrete hollow floor is suitable for long-span and large-load structural systems, especially for structures with a span of more than 7.8 meters, high groundwater level and hard foundation. (2) Cast-in-place concrete hollow floor is widely used, but its development is limited by internal mould. Therefore, the development of internal mould with high strength, light weight, low price, high degree of factory processing and excellent quality is the most important one. (3) applying the existing quota valuation according to the corresponding subhead can basically meet the requirements of the current material consumption and market price. However, it is necessary to supplement some quota items accordingly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青島理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:TU755
[Abstract]:With the development of China's construction industry, multi-ribbed hollow floor structure has been widely used. In order to meet the requirements of modern buildings, such as light weight, large space and short height, free spacing and good seismic performance, a single floor system has been unable to meet the needs, and a variety of new floor systems emerged as the times require. The selection and arrangement of floor is not only related to the strength of the structure, but also to the normal use of the structure, the level of cost, the indoor landscape effect and the convenience of construction and other factors. It is an urgent problem that how to select the appropriate floor structure and what kind of floor structure can improve the efficiency and economy of different projects. In this paper, the honeycomb core floor, thin-walled box floor, laminated box floor, and BM roof are analyzed and compared with the conventional beam slab floor, the well beam floor and the traditional multi-ribbed floor, which are mainly used for the analysis of the honeycomb core floor, thin-walled box floor, superimposed box floor and BM roof in the new type of multi-ribbed hollow floor. The main contents of this paper are as follows: (1) comparative analysis of the structural performance of various floor structures, (2) comparative analysis of construction techniques of various floor structures, and elaboration of construction difficulties and key points of quality control of various floors; (3) comparing and analyzing the engineering cost and construction efficiency of various floor floors in combination with engineering examples; (4) comparing and analyzing the comprehensive benefits of various floor floors, and finally finding out the reasonable scope of application of the new type of multi-ribbed hollow floor. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) A new type of cast-in-place concrete hollow floor is suitable for long-span and large-load structural systems, especially for structures with a span of more than 7.8 meters, high groundwater level and hard foundation. (2) Cast-in-place concrete hollow floor is widely used, but its development is limited by internal mould. Therefore, the development of internal mould with high strength, light weight, low price, high degree of factory processing and excellent quality is the most important one. (3) applying the existing quota valuation according to the corresponding subhead can basically meet the requirements of the current material consumption and market price. However, it is necessary to supplement some quota items accordingly.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青島理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:TU755
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 高仲學(xué),程文p<,黃曉暉,李少波,吳京平;無(wú)柱帽混凝土空心無(wú)梁樓蓋的設(shè)計(jì)與研究[J];工業(yè)建筑;2003年02期
2 馬克儉,黃勇,肖建春,張華剛;大跨度鋼筋混凝土空腹夾層板柱結(jié)構(gòu)研究與應(yīng)用[J];貴州工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期
3 黃泰
本文編號(hào):2276705
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2276705.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著