發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-17 10:11

【摘要】：21世紀(jì)是人口老齡化快速發(fā)展的時(shí)代，嚴(yán)重的人口老齡化所帶來(lái)的老年人居住問題在一些亞洲國(guó)家和地區(qū)更加突出。亞洲的日本、新加坡、香港地區(qū)和我國(guó)都處于儒家文化圈，具有非常相似的價(jià)值觀念、社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)、文化傳統(tǒng)。這三個(gè)國(guó)家和地區(qū)的“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住空間體系的發(fā)展相對(duì)成熟完善，因此他們的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)于我國(guó)“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住空間體系的建設(shè)有著非常重要的借鑒意義。 日本老年人居住建筑從模仿西方國(guó)家到逐步發(fā)展出符合本國(guó)傳統(tǒng)、種類豐富的老年人居住建筑形式,并且相近的生活習(xí)慣對(duì)中國(guó)有參考意義。新加坡大部分國(guó)人居住在新加坡建屋發(fā)展局承建的社會(huì)住宅里，這種發(fā)展模式可以為我國(guó)社會(huì)住宅體系適老化方面的建設(shè)提供參考方向。香港在公屋建設(shè)、社區(qū)照顧服務(wù)等老年人居住環(huán)境建設(shè)的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)于我國(guó)一些大城市頗有啟發(fā)。 本文將通過搜集日本、新加坡及香港地區(qū)關(guān)于“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住體系的建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀及其經(jīng)濟(jì)文化、政策體系等方面的各種統(tǒng)計(jì)文獻(xiàn)及網(wǎng)絡(luò)資源，利用比較、歸納、演繹等分析方法，對(duì)有關(guān)資料數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行篩選甑別，并對(duì)典型案例進(jìn)行全面的剖析，進(jìn)行政策、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、設(shè)計(jì)趨勢(shì)和老年住宅模式等多角度的比較深入研究，以期總結(jié)出其中的發(fā)展規(guī)律及先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)與教訓(xùn)，從我國(guó)的“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住體系建設(shè)的角度，探索適當(dāng)?shù)陌l(fā)展對(duì)策。日本、新加坡及香港都經(jīng)歷了前期提倡和建設(shè)多代合居的居住模式，而目前老年人獨(dú)立居住、子女相鄰而居的模式則開始成為主流形式。根據(jù)我國(guó)城市中老年人獨(dú)立居住的比例逐年上升的趨勢(shì)，因此筆者認(rèn)為老年人獨(dú)立居住、子女相鄰而居的老年集合住宅體系可以作為我國(guó)“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住體系建設(shè)的一個(gè)方向。與商品住宅相比，政府主導(dǎo)的社會(huì)住宅是以解決社會(huì)居住問題為原則，因此筆者認(rèn)為未來(lái)社會(huì)住宅體系下的老年集合住宅在“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住體系建設(shè)方面可以取得一定突破。 本文第一部分為第一章，提出了研究背景、總結(jié)了研究現(xiàn)狀，明確了研究的對(duì)象、目的、意義、內(nèi)容和框架。第二部分為日本、新加坡及香港“在宅養(yǎng)老”政策和居住空間體系的建設(shè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)比較研究，包括第二章、第三章、第四章和第五章。第三部分為我國(guó)“在宅養(yǎng)老”居住空間體系建設(shè)的啟示，，包括第六章建設(shè)對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is an era of rapid development of population aging. The problem of living of the elderly brought by the serious aging of the population is more prominent in some Asian countries and regions. Asia's Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong and China are all in Confucian culture, with very similar values, social structure, and cultural traditions. These three countries and regions' living space system is relatively mature and perfect, so their successful experience has a very important significance for the construction of living space system of "home endowment" living space system in our country. From imitating the western countries to gradually developing the residential architecture of the elderly in Japan, which accords with the national tradition and is rich in variety, the similar living habits are of reference significance to China. The majority of Singaporeans live in the social housing built by the Singapore Housing Development Board. This mode of development can provide a reference for the construction of our country's social housing system. Hong Kong's experience in the construction of public housing, community care services and other elderly living environment construction is very enlightening for some big cities in China. This paper will collect all kinds of statistical documents and network resources of Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong on the construction status, economic culture, policy system and so on of the living system of "living for the aged in residence". Deduction and other analytical methods, screening and discriminating the relevant data, and comprehensive analysis of typical cases, carrying on the policy, economy, culture, design trend and the model of the elderly housing and other multi-angle comparative in-depth study, In order to sum up the law of development and the advanced experience and lessons, from the point of view of the construction of the living system of "the aged in residence" in China, the author explores the appropriate development countermeasures. Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong have all experienced the early promotion and construction of multi-generation and co-habitation mode, while the current mode of living independently of the elderly and their children living next to each other has become the mainstream. According to the increasing trend of the proportion of elderly people living independently in cities of our country, the author thinks that the elderly live independently. The residential system of the elderly people living next to each other can be regarded as a direction of the construction of the residential system of providing for the aged in our country. Compared with the commercial housing, the government-led social housing is based on the principle of solving the social housing problem. Therefore, the author thinks that the old-age collective housing under the future social housing system can make a certain breakthrough in the construction of the residential system of "providing for the aged in the house for the aged". The first part of this paper is the first chapter, which puts forward the research background, summarizes the current research situation, and clarifies the object, purpose, significance, content and framework of the research. The second part is a comparative study of Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong's policy of "living for the aged" and the construction of living space system, including chapter two, chapter three, chapter four and chapter five. The third part is the enlightenment of the construction of living space system, including the sixth chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU241.93

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 俞佳;徐竹晴;賈臨宇;;日本公營(yíng)住宅與中國(guó)廉租房的比較研究[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

2 張晨子;;新加坡住房保障政策對(duì)我國(guó)保障性住房建設(shè)的啟示[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

3 王軍;居者有其屋:新加坡住宅建設(shè)奇跡[J];中華建設(shè);2005年06期

4 于一凡;新加坡的居住環(huán)境設(shè)計(jì)[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年02期

5 熊國(guó)經(jīng);周敏建;;日本公營(yíng)住宅的運(yùn)作體系[J];城市問題;2012年02期

6 周素勤,楊值珍;淺析新加坡的老人問題及政府對(duì)策[J];東南亞縱橫;2002年11期

7 佘立中;香港公屋建設(shè)面臨的挑戰(zhàn)及對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2001年02期

8 趙進(jìn);;香港公營(yíng)房屋建設(shè)及其啟示[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2010年03期

9 馬慶林;;日本住宅建設(shè)計(jì)劃及其借鑒意義[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2012年04期

10 高峰;;兩全其美的香港社區(qū)養(yǎng)老模式[J];改革與開放;2011年05期

本文編號(hào)：2276323