【摘要】：區(qū)域規(guī)劃是國(guó)家針對(duì)特定地區(qū)范圍進(jìn)行總體的發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略部署,它對(duì)所規(guī)劃區(qū)域整個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)的發(fā)展方向和發(fā)展重點(diǎn)都有重要的指導(dǎo)作用。截止到2011年11月,國(guó)家發(fā)展和改革委員會(huì)共批準(zhǔn)了長(zhǎng)江三角洲、珠江三角洲等13個(gè)區(qū)域規(guī)劃文件,表明我國(guó)區(qū)域化發(fā)展的趨勢(shì)越來越明顯,而針對(duì)規(guī)劃區(qū)域的政策效率評(píng)價(jià)可為國(guó)家區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策的政策因素投入進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化,在資源有限的情況下,避免低效率的政策投入。區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策效率評(píng)價(jià)作為區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策實(shí)施過程中的一個(gè)重要組成部分,在評(píng)價(jià)區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策實(shí)施優(yōu)劣、改善后續(xù)政策制定、提高目前規(guī)劃政策效率等方面,都起到重要的參考作用,因此,區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策效率評(píng)價(jià)在區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策研究中占有重要的地位。 論文分為五章。第一章為緒論,主要闡述論文的研究背景、研究意義、研究現(xiàn)狀以及本文的技術(shù)路線,技術(shù)路線部分詳細(xì)解釋了本文的研究原理。第二章為區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策評(píng)價(jià)的原理概述,主要論述了區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策評(píng)價(jià)的流程和方法、DEA的基本要素、DEA理論的發(fā)展,主要介紹了本文用到的原理和方法。第三章為基于DEA的政策效率評(píng)價(jià)原理,主要選取了政策效率評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)、概述了四種政策效率及其區(qū)別、提出了總體政策因素投入效率的評(píng)價(jià)原理、投入冗余／產(chǎn)出不足的計(jì)算公式、規(guī)模效率的測(cè)算及規(guī)模報(bào)酬區(qū)間的判定、指標(biāo)對(duì)政策的敏感性判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及判定原理。第四章是基于DEA的區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策效率評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)證,選取長(zhǎng)三角2000-2010年的政策指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù),相繼對(duì)長(zhǎng)三角的總體政策因素投入效率、規(guī)模效率進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià),分析了政策因素投入冗余或產(chǎn)出不足、指標(biāo)對(duì)長(zhǎng)三角區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策的敏感性,并提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。第五章是本文的結(jié)論和特色,實(shí)證結(jié)果表明：國(guó)家對(duì)長(zhǎng)三角的政策不敏感指標(biāo)投入過多是導(dǎo)致規(guī)劃政策在長(zhǎng)三角的實(shí)施效率不突出的主要原因。 論文的創(chuàng)新與特色有三：一是通過對(duì)比分析剔除單項(xiàng)指標(biāo)后的總體政策因素投入效率和保留所有指標(biāo)的總體政策因素投入效率,判別各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)對(duì)區(qū)域規(guī)劃政策的敏感性,改變現(xiàn)有研究只能進(jìn)行效率評(píng)價(jià),無法衡量指標(biāo)敏感性的弊端。二是針對(duì)未達(dá)到總體政策因素投入效率最優(yōu)的區(qū)域,測(cè)算政策因素投入冗余和效果產(chǎn)出不足,提出有針對(duì)性的政策改進(jìn)措施。三是通過對(duì)比政策因素投入效率PE是否等于純政策因素投入效率PPE,判別被評(píng)價(jià)省份所處的規(guī)模報(bào)酬區(qū)間,進(jìn)而找到了對(duì)處于規(guī)模遞增地區(qū)、用增加投入的方式提高效率,反之則采用減少投入的方式來增加效率的對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Regional planning is the overall development strategy deployment of the country in view of the specific regional scope. It plays an important guiding role in the development direction and development focus of the whole economic construction of the planned region. By November 2011, the National Development and Reform Commission had approved 13 regional planning documents, such as the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, indicating that the trend of regionalization in China is becoming more and more obvious. The evaluation of the policy efficiency of the planning region can optimize the policy input of the national regional planning policy and avoid the inefficient policy input under the condition of limited resources. As an important part of the process of regional planning policy implementation, the evaluation of regional planning policy efficiency, in evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of regional planning policy implementation, improving the follow-up policy formulation, improving the efficiency of current planning policies, etc. Therefore, the evaluation of regional planning policy efficiency plays an important role in regional planning policy research. The paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which mainly explains the research background, research significance, research status and the technical route of this paper, which explains the research principle in detail. The second chapter is an overview of the principle of regional planning policy evaluation. It mainly discusses the process and method of regional planning policy evaluation and the development of DEA theory, and mainly introduces the principles and methods used in this paper. The third chapter is the evaluation principle of policy efficiency based on DEA. It mainly selects the index of policy efficiency evaluation, summarizes four kinds of policy efficiency and their differences, and puts forward the evaluation principle of overall policy factor input efficiency. The calculation formula of input redundancy / output deficiency, the calculation of scale efficiency and the judgment of scale reward interval, the criterion and principle of the sensitivity of index to policy. The fourth chapter is based on the DEA regional planning policy efficiency evaluation empirical, select the Yangtze River Delta 2000-2010 policy index data, the overall policy factors of the Yangtze River Delta investment efficiency, scale efficiency has been evaluated. The sensitivity of the policy factors to the policy of Yangtze River Delta region planning is analyzed, and the corresponding policy suggestions are put forward. The fifth chapter is the conclusion and characteristics of this paper. The empirical results show that excessive input of policy insensitive indicators to the Yangtze River Delta is the main reason why the implementation efficiency of planning policies in the Yangtze River Delta is not outstanding. The innovation and characteristics of this paper are as follows: first, the sensitivity of each index to regional planning policy can be distinguished by comparing and analyzing the input efficiency of overall policy factors after removing single index and retaining the overall policy factor efficiency of all indicators. To change the existing research can only evaluate the efficiency, can not measure the shortcomings of index sensitivity. Secondly, aiming at the regions that have not reached the optimal input efficiency of overall policy factors, the redundancy of input of policy factors and the insufficiency of effect and output are calculated, and the corresponding policy improvement measures are put forward. Thirdly, by comparing whether the policy factor input efficiency (PE) is equal to the pure policy factor input efficiency (PPE,), the paper judges the scale reward interval of the evaluated province, and then finds out how to increase the efficiency by increasing the investment in the region in which the scale is increasing. On the contrary, reduce the investment to increase the efficiency of the countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU981-01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳廣謀;盛昭瀚;;指標(biāo)特性與DEA有效性的關(guān)系[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1992年05期

2 朱喬，盛昭瀚，吳廣謀;DEA模型中的有效性問題[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期

3 曾祥云,吳育華;L-R型區(qū)間DEA模型及其變換[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

4 張洪輝;王宗軍;趙丹;;基于隨機(jī)前沿的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與公司效率影響實(shí)證研究[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2010年03期

5 顏鵬飛,王兵;技術(shù)效率、技術(shù)進(jìn)步與生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng):基于DEA的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年12期

6 楊印生,張德駿;熵-DEA有效性[J];吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1993年01期

7 馬本江,楊印生,王全文;對(duì) DEA 有效的決策單元性質(zhì)的討論[J];吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

8 邱兆祥;張愛武;;基于FDH方法的中國(guó)商業(yè)銀行X-效率研究[J];金融研究;2009年11期

9 吳強(qiáng);解金玲;;基于模糊數(shù)學(xué)方法的區(qū)域科技實(shí)力DEA評(píng)價(jià)[J];科技管理研究;2005年11期

10 馬占新,任慧龍,戴仰山;基于模糊綜合評(píng)判方法的DEA模型[J];模糊系統(tǒng)與數(shù)學(xué);2001年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫娜;樣本DEA有效性研究及其靈敏度分析[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2238787