【摘要】：建筑工程往往涉及多方利益體,而各個(gè)利益主體的利益訴求往往不一致,從而出現(xiàn)各類工程糾紛,由此常會(huì)導(dǎo)致工程延誤、社會(huì)關(guān)系破壞等問(wèn)題,影響到社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定。大量研究成果表明,基于博弈論發(fā)展而來(lái)的偏對(duì)策與沖突分析理論,對(duì)解決各類工程糾紛是行之有效的。然而,傳統(tǒng)的偏對(duì)策與沖突分析理論在分析具體糾紛問(wèn)題時(shí),當(dāng)事者之間的權(quán)力差異要么完全未被考慮,要么有被研究人員模糊考慮,但不準(zhǔn)確、全面。這使得根據(jù)模型得到的均衡解或者對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)缺乏足夠的解釋力,或者在實(shí)際糾紛中不為權(quán)力強(qiáng)勢(shì)方所接受。本文旨在通過(guò)考慮權(quán)力對(duì)糾紛主體產(chǎn)生的各種影響,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的偏對(duì)策與沖突分析模型進(jìn)行修正,建立基于權(quán)力視角的沖突分析模型體系。 本研究首先對(duì)工程糾紛中的權(quán)力及其屬性予以界定,同時(shí)對(duì)建筑工程糾紛中的權(quán)力屬性進(jìn)行了分析； 其次,根據(jù)權(quán)力的定義及屬性,識(shí)別出糾紛中常見(jiàn)的八種權(quán)力類型；通過(guò)對(duì)三類權(quán)力成本及糾紛主體權(quán)力風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好的分析,建立糾紛主體判斷各方權(quán)力大小的權(quán)力判斷模型。同時(shí)基于社會(huì)心理學(xué)的研究成果,以實(shí)際工程糾紛為對(duì)象,對(duì)工程糾紛中權(quán)力對(duì)糾紛主體的心理和行為產(chǎn)生影響的三類效應(yīng)進(jìn)行分析。 然后,根據(jù)權(quán)力判斷模型,通過(guò)提取糾紛中的權(quán)力信息,實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)糾紛的權(quán)力階段劃分；在各個(gè)權(quán)力階段內(nèi),依次通過(guò)對(duì)糾紛干系人及非干系人的特征分析,分離出糾紛中的當(dāng)事者、支援者以及介入者。進(jìn)而對(duì)比該三類干系人與局中人的特征,設(shè)定識(shí)別準(zhǔn)則,從而確定沖突分析模型的局中人；通過(guò)分析糾紛的利益爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)以及局中人的權(quán)力狀態(tài),從而完成各局中人的策略設(shè)定；通過(guò)分析局中人策略間的相互關(guān)系,識(shí)別出糾紛中的不可行策略組合類型,同時(shí)通過(guò)考慮權(quán)力效應(yīng),設(shè)置相應(yīng)的調(diào)整規(guī)則,進(jìn)而完成可行局勢(shì)的設(shè)定；根據(jù)各可行局勢(shì)的效用值序列,確定出局中人的純效用偏好,再通過(guò)考慮權(quán)力效應(yīng),建立偏好修正規(guī)則,得到局中人基于權(quán)力視角的偏好序列；在上述各要素確定的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)行穩(wěn)定性分析,從而完成基于權(quán)力視角的沖突分析模型體系構(gòu)建。 最后,以現(xiàn)實(shí)拆遷糾紛為例,對(duì)基于權(quán)力視角的沖突分析模型體系的有效性進(jìn)行了驗(yàn)證。
[Abstract]:Construction projects often involve multiple interests, but the interests of the main interests of the demands are often inconsistent, resulting in a variety of engineering disputes, which often lead to delays in the project, social damage and other issues, affecting the social harmony and stability. A large number of research results show that the game theory based on the development of partial countermeasures and conflict analysis theory is effective to solve all kinds of engineering disputes. However, when the traditional partial game and conflict analysis theory analyze the specific dispute, the power difference between the parties is either completely ignored or vaguely considered by the researchers, but it is inaccurate and comprehensive. This makes the equilibrium solution based on the model either lack sufficient explanation to the reality or is not accepted by the powerful power side in the actual dispute. This paper aims to set up a conflict analysis model system based on the perspective of power by considering the influence of power on the main body of the dispute and modifying the traditional partial countermeasures and conflict analysis model. Firstly, this study defines the power and its attribute in the engineering dispute, and analyzes the power attribute in the construction dispute. Secondly, according to the definition and attribute of the power, Through the analysis of the three kinds of power cost and the risk preference of the power of the dispute subject, the power judgment model of the dispute subject to judge the power of each party is established. At the same time, based on the research results of social psychology, this paper analyzes the three kinds of effects of power on the psychology and behavior of the subject in the actual engineering dispute, taking the actual engineering dispute as the object. Then, according to the power judgment model, by extracting the power information in the dispute, the power phase of the dispute can be divided. Separate out the parties, supporters, and interventioners in the dispute. Then, by comparing the characteristics of the three kinds of stakeholders and the people in the bureau, setting the identification criteria, determining the person in the bureau of the conflict analysis model, by analyzing the points of interest contention in the dispute and the power state of the person in the bureau, the strategy setting of the person in each bureau can be completed. By analyzing the relationship between the tactics of people in the bureau, we can identify the combination types of infeasible strategies in the disputes, and set up the corresponding adjustment rules by considering the power effect, and then complete the setting of feasible situations. According to the utility value sequence of each feasible situation, the pure utility preference of the outgoing person is determined, and then by considering the power effect, the preference correction rule is established, and the preference sequence based on the power perspective is obtained. Stability analysis is carried out to build the conflict analysis model system based on power perspective. Finally, the validity of the conflict analysis model based on power perspective is verified by taking the real demolition dispute as an example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU71

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱東愷,施國(guó)慶;城市建設(shè)征地和拆遷中的利益關(guān)系分析[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2004年03期

2 周仲秋;何靜;;博弈視角中的中國(guó)拆遷困局破解:從非合作博弈到共商雙贏[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

3 陳曉,張偉;淺談建筑經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛調(diào)處工作[J];廣西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

4 郭玉亮;;城市拆遷現(xiàn)象透析:利益沖突下的多方博弈[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2011年02期

5 劉洪;沖突分析理論及其應(yīng)用中的若干問(wèn)題[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);1996年11期

6 申月紅;和平解決建設(shè)工程糾紛的重要途徑——律師指導(dǎo)下的專業(yè)索賠[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年06期

7 蔡建峰;軟對(duì)策論研究的基本思路、進(jìn)展與展望[J];寧夏工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

8 王宇雄;以仲裁方式解決建筑市場(chǎng)糾紛的探討[J];交通科技;2005年03期

9 李雁晨;周庭銳;周t;;解釋水平理論:從時(shí)間距離到心理距離[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年04期

10 吳育華，程德文;信息不完備沖突分析的研究方法及應(yīng)用[J];系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2186258